The Role of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography in Risk Stratification for Coronary Artery Disease

Sophie E. van Rosendael MD, PhD , Arthur Shiyovich MD , Rhanderson N. Cardoso MD , Camila Veronica Souza Freire MD , Alexander R. van Rosendael MD, PhD , Fay Y. Lin MD , Gina Larocca MD , Solomon W. Bienstock MD , Ron Blankstein MD , Leslee J. Shaw PhD
{"title":"The Role of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography in Risk Stratification for Coronary Artery Disease","authors":"Sophie E. van Rosendael MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Arthur Shiyovich MD ,&nbsp;Rhanderson N. Cardoso MD ,&nbsp;Camila Veronica Souza Freire MD ,&nbsp;Alexander R. van Rosendael MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Fay Y. Lin MD ,&nbsp;Gina Larocca MD ,&nbsp;Solomon W. Bienstock MD ,&nbsp;Ron Blankstein MD ,&nbsp;Leslee J. Shaw PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) allows the assessment of the presence and severity of obstructive and nonobstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. With software developments incorporating artificial intelligence-based automated image analysis along with improved spatial resolution of CT scanners, volumetric measurements of atherosclerotic plaque, detection of high-risk plaque features, and delineation of pericoronary adipose tissue density can now be readily and accurately evaluated for a given at-risk patient. Many of these expanded diagnostic measures have been shown to be prognostically useful for prediction of major adverse cardiac events. The incremental value of plaque quantification over diameter stenosis has yet to be thoroughly discovered in current studies. Furthermore, the physiological significance of lesions can also be assessed with CT-derived fractional flow reserve, myocardial CT perfusion, and more recently shear stress, potentially leading to selective invasive coronary angiography and revascularization. Along with these technological advancements, there has been additional high-quality evidence for CCTA including large randomized clinical trials supporting high-level recommendations from many international clinical practice guidelines. Current trials largely compare a CCTA vs functional testing strategy, yet there is minimal evidence on CCTA plaque-guided therapeutic trials to measure regression of atherosclerosis and prevention of major coronary artery disease events. In this review, we summarize current evidence on comprehensive risk assessment with CCTA and future directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 11","pages":"Article 102230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324016107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) allows the assessment of the presence and severity of obstructive and nonobstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. With software developments incorporating artificial intelligence-based automated image analysis along with improved spatial resolution of CT scanners, volumetric measurements of atherosclerotic plaque, detection of high-risk plaque features, and delineation of pericoronary adipose tissue density can now be readily and accurately evaluated for a given at-risk patient. Many of these expanded diagnostic measures have been shown to be prognostically useful for prediction of major adverse cardiac events. The incremental value of plaque quantification over diameter stenosis has yet to be thoroughly discovered in current studies. Furthermore, the physiological significance of lesions can also be assessed with CT-derived fractional flow reserve, myocardial CT perfusion, and more recently shear stress, potentially leading to selective invasive coronary angiography and revascularization. Along with these technological advancements, there has been additional high-quality evidence for CCTA including large randomized clinical trials supporting high-level recommendations from many international clinical practice guidelines. Current trials largely compare a CCTA vs functional testing strategy, yet there is minimal evidence on CCTA plaque-guided therapeutic trials to measure regression of atherosclerosis and prevention of major coronary artery disease events. In this review, we summarize current evidence on comprehensive risk assessment with CCTA and future directions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影在冠状动脉疾病风险分层中的作用
冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CCTA)可评估阻塞性和非阻塞性冠状动脉粥样硬化性疾病的存在和严重程度。随着以人工智能为基础的自动图像分析软件的发展以及 CT 扫描仪空间分辨率的提高,现在可以对特定高危患者进行动脉粥样硬化斑块的容积测量、高危斑块特征的检测以及冠状动脉周围脂肪组织密度的划定。其中许多扩展的诊断措施已被证明对预测重大心脏不良事件有预后作用。在目前的研究中,斑块量化比直径狭窄的增量价值尚未被彻底发现。此外,病变的生理意义还可以通过 CT 导出的分数血流储备、心肌 CT 灌注以及最近的剪切应力进行评估,从而可能导致选择性有创冠状动脉造影和血管再通。随着这些技术的进步,CCTA 也获得了更多高质量的证据,包括支持许多国际临床实践指南高水平建议的大型随机临床试验。目前的试验主要是比较 CCTA 与功能测试策略,但有关 CCTA 斑块引导治疗试验的证据极少,无法衡量动脉粥样硬化的消退情况和主要冠状动脉疾病事件的预防情况。在这篇综述中,我们总结了目前使用 CCTA 进行综合风险评估的证据以及未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Table of contents Retraction notice to "E-39 | Association Between Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitor Use and 30-Day Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Analysis" [JSCAI 3 (2024) 101800] Cover SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Patients With STEMI Referred for Primary PCI Optimizing Primary PCI Care for STEMI Patients: Key Messages From the SCAI Expert Consensus Statement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1