Conceptualising and cultivating Critical GAI Literacy in doctoral academic writing

IF 5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101156
Amy Wanyu Ou , Baraa Khuder , Sindija Franzetti , Raffaella Negretti
{"title":"Conceptualising and cultivating Critical GAI Literacy in doctoral academic writing","authors":"Amy Wanyu Ou ,&nbsp;Baraa Khuder ,&nbsp;Sindija Franzetti ,&nbsp;Raffaella Negretti","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has revolutionised the landscape of academic writing, presenting both advantages and risks to learning for L2 writers. It is thus imperative that L2 writers, especially at advanced academic levels, develop the critical skills necessary for employing GAI tools ethically and effectively in their writing processes. Our study addressed this need by 1) conceptualising Critical GAI Literacy based on current research and our collected data, and 2) developing a self-regulated learning-based micro-curriculum for L2 doctoral students to cultivate knowledge and skills using GAI for academic writing. We collected interactive and reflective data in an introductory-level academic writing course at a Swedish university enrolled with 60 PhD students from diverse backgrounds and examined their evolving perspectives and strategies for engaging in GAI-mediated writing. Findings show a spectrum of initial attitudes among students and limited knowledge of GAI use. Final reflections illustrate de-enchantment with GAI, recalibrated and enhanced understanding of ethical issues, developed prompting methods, and increased awareness of text ownership through the self-directed learning process. Furthermore, students demonstrated a discerning approach in evaluating GAI-generated suggestions and sociolinguistic impacts, indicating a growing criticality in L2 writing practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101156"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000638","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has revolutionised the landscape of academic writing, presenting both advantages and risks to learning for L2 writers. It is thus imperative that L2 writers, especially at advanced academic levels, develop the critical skills necessary for employing GAI tools ethically and effectively in their writing processes. Our study addressed this need by 1) conceptualising Critical GAI Literacy based on current research and our collected data, and 2) developing a self-regulated learning-based micro-curriculum for L2 doctoral students to cultivate knowledge and skills using GAI for academic writing. We collected interactive and reflective data in an introductory-level academic writing course at a Swedish university enrolled with 60 PhD students from diverse backgrounds and examined their evolving perspectives and strategies for engaging in GAI-mediated writing. Findings show a spectrum of initial attitudes among students and limited knowledge of GAI use. Final reflections illustrate de-enchantment with GAI, recalibrated and enhanced understanding of ethical issues, developed prompting methods, and increased awareness of text ownership through the self-directed learning process. Furthermore, students demonstrated a discerning approach in evaluating GAI-generated suggestions and sociolinguistic impacts, indicating a growing criticality in L2 writing practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在博士学术论文写作中构思和培养批判性 GAI 素养
生成式人工智能(GAI)已经彻底改变了学术写作的面貌,为第二语言写作者的学习带来了优势和风险。因此,二语写作者,尤其是高级学术水平的写作者,必须发展必要的批判性技能,以便在写作过程中合乎道德地、有效地使用 GAI 工具。我们的研究通过以下方式满足了这一需求:1)基于当前的研究和我们收集的数据,对 "GAI关键素养 "进行概念化;2)为L2博士生开发基于自我调节学习的微型课程,以培养他们在学术写作中使用GAI的知识和技能。我们在瑞典一所大学的入门级学术写作课程中收集了互动和反思数据,该课程招收了 60 名来自不同背景的博士生,并研究了他们在参与以 GAI 为媒介的写作时不断变化的观点和策略。研究结果表明,学生们最初的态度各不相同,对 GAI 使用的了解也很有限。最后的反思表明,学生对 GAI 不再着迷,对伦理问题的理解得到了重新调整和提高,开发了提示方法,并通过自主学习过程提高了对文本所有权的认识。此外,学生们在评估 GAI 所产生的建议和社会语言影响时表现出了独到的方法,这表明他们在 L2 写作实践中的批判性在不断增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
期刊最新文献
Exploring EFL learners’ engagement and draft quality in a multi-stage expository writing task using model texts as a feedback facilitator: A mixed-methods study Steering toward situational propensity/shi 势: A multicase study of planning and developing EFL writing centres in China An exploration of CFL learners’ metaphor use in second language writing: Effects of genre and topic Incorporating digital multimodal composition in content teaching: A multimodal analysis of students’ legal popularization videos AI or student writing? Analyzing the situational and linguistic characteristics of undergraduate student writing and AI-generated assignments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1