Needle-free atrial transseptal access: A safe and reproducible alternative for left atrial catheterization

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Rhythm O2 Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.005
Alex D. Pacheco-Bouthillier MD , Jorge Javier Miguel-González MD , Adriana González-Martínez MD, PhD , Anna G. Everding-Rodríguez MD , Silvia S. Gómez-Delgadillo MD , Ángel E. Chávez-Torres MD , Angélica Fregoso-Sánchez MD , Benigno Ferreira-Piña MD , Óscar S. Lomelí-Sánchez MD, MSc , Hugo E. Coutiño-Moreno MD, PhD , Vitelio A. Mariona-Montero MD
{"title":"Needle-free atrial transseptal access: A safe and reproducible alternative for left atrial catheterization","authors":"Alex D. Pacheco-Bouthillier MD ,&nbsp;Jorge Javier Miguel-González MD ,&nbsp;Adriana González-Martínez MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anna G. Everding-Rodríguez MD ,&nbsp;Silvia S. Gómez-Delgadillo MD ,&nbsp;Ángel E. Chávez-Torres MD ,&nbsp;Angélica Fregoso-Sánchez MD ,&nbsp;Benigno Ferreira-Piña MD ,&nbsp;Óscar S. Lomelí-Sánchez MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Hugo E. Coutiño-Moreno MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Vitelio A. Mariona-Montero MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Left atrial catheterization is a common procedure in electrophysiology labs to treat arrhythmogenic substrates on the left side of the heart. Needle transseptal puncture is the standard approach, but it can lead to complications related to device design or operator technique. To reduce these complications, needle-free alternatives have been explored.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to report the first multicenter application of the needle-free transseptal access (NeFTA) approach, assessing its safety and efficacy in patients undergoing electrophysiological procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, observational multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the NeFTA approach in patients undergoing ablation of left arrhythmogenic substrates across 3 electrophysiology centers in Mexico. NeFTA uses only a guidewire, without a needle or sharp guidewire. The sheath, with a dilator, is guided into the fossa ovalis under fluoroscopic guidance, using anterior force and clockwise torque to allow the guidewire to puncture the septum with minimal risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The NeFTA technique was used in 366 patients. Most sheaths were deflectable, with nondeflectable sheaths in 43.4% of cases. Left atrial access via NeFTA was successful in 96.18% of cases, with pericardial effusion as the only complication (0.55% rate).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This technique was reproducible and safe, achieving successful access on the first or second attempt in 96.18% of cases, regardless of the operator.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 11","pages":"Pages 788-795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Left atrial catheterization is a common procedure in electrophysiology labs to treat arrhythmogenic substrates on the left side of the heart. Needle transseptal puncture is the standard approach, but it can lead to complications related to device design or operator technique. To reduce these complications, needle-free alternatives have been explored.

Objective

This study aims to report the first multicenter application of the needle-free transseptal access (NeFTA) approach, assessing its safety and efficacy in patients undergoing electrophysiological procedures.

Methods

This retrospective, observational multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the NeFTA approach in patients undergoing ablation of left arrhythmogenic substrates across 3 electrophysiology centers in Mexico. NeFTA uses only a guidewire, without a needle or sharp guidewire. The sheath, with a dilator, is guided into the fossa ovalis under fluoroscopic guidance, using anterior force and clockwise torque to allow the guidewire to puncture the septum with minimal risk.

Results

The NeFTA technique was used in 366 patients. Most sheaths were deflectable, with nondeflectable sheaths in 43.4% of cases. Left atrial access via NeFTA was successful in 96.18% of cases, with pericardial effusion as the only complication (0.55% rate).

Conclusion

This technique was reproducible and safe, achieving successful access on the first or second attempt in 96.18% of cases, regardless of the operator.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无针心房经塞通道:安全、可重复的左心房导管检查替代方法
背景左心房导管术是电生理学实验室治疗心脏左侧致心律失常基质的常见手术。经脐穿刺留置针是标准方法,但它可能导致与设备设计或操作者技术有关的并发症。这项回顾性、观察性多中心研究评估了 NeFTA 方法在墨西哥 3 个电生理学中心接受左侧致心律失常基质消融术患者中的安全性和有效性。NeFTA 只使用一根导丝,没有针或锋利的导丝。带扩张器的鞘在透视引导下进入卵圆窝,利用前方的力量和顺时针方向的扭矩使导丝刺穿室间隔,并将风险降至最低。大多数鞘管是可偏转的,43.4%的病例使用不可偏转的鞘管。96.18%的病例通过NeFTA成功进入左心房,心包积液是唯一的并发症(发生率为0.55%)。结论该技术具有可重复性和安全性,96.18%的病例在第一次或第二次尝试时成功进入,与操作者无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Needle-free atrial transseptal access: A safe and reproducible alternative for left atrial catheterization Differences in clinical significance of atrial tachyarrhythmias in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation vs Brugada syndrome: A multicenter study Temporal changes in device-derived daily activity related to ventricular arrhythmias from the CERTITUDE registry Ventricular arrhythmias after atrial fibrillation electrical cardioversion: A multicenter study Ventricular tachycardia: Focal pulsed field electroporation as a rescue therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1