Sophia Jette , Constance de Schaetzen , Chia-Chen Tsai , Helen Tremlett
{"title":"The multiple sclerosis gut microbiome and disease activity: A systematic review","authors":"Sophia Jette , Constance de Schaetzen , Chia-Chen Tsai , Helen Tremlett","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.106151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The gut microbiome is a potential therapeutic target for multiple sclerosis (MS), yet its association with disease activity remains unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the relationship between the gut microbiome and MS disease activity, course, and disability progression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar (01/2011–02/2024) to identify relevant observational or interventional studies published in English. Case reports were ineligible. Outcomes included disease activity (e.g. relapses, MRI), course (e.g. relapsing-remitting/secondary-progressive [RR/SPMS]) and disability progression (e.g. using the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]). Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four longitudinal and nineteen cross-sectional studies were included, totaling 1760 persons with MS. Most were female (1237/1760, 70 %) and had RRMS (1378/1760, 78 %). The majority of studies (67 %;10/15) examining gut diversity (alpha or beta) did not find an association with disease activity, course or progression. However, several gut taxa exhibited significant associations with study outcomes, including eight that varied in consistent directions: a higher abundance of <em>Actinobacteria, Bacteroidota</em> and <em>Roseburia inulinivorans</em> were associated with better MS outcomes (e.g. lower EDSS scores), while higher abundances of <em>Streptococcus, Clostridium nexile, Clostridium scindens</em> and <em>Collinsella aerofaciens</em> were associated with worse outcomes (e.g. higher MRI lesion volumes).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Gut diversity was not associated with MS-related outcomes in most studies whereas several gut taxa were, including higher abundances of short chain-fatty acid producers (e.g. <em>Bacteroidota</em>) showing associations with lower EDSS scores. Most studies were cross-sectional, limiting interpretation of findings; longitudinal studies are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 106151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824007272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The gut microbiome is a potential therapeutic target for multiple sclerosis (MS), yet its association with disease activity remains unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the relationship between the gut microbiome and MS disease activity, course, and disability progression.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar (01/2011–02/2024) to identify relevant observational or interventional studies published in English. Case reports were ineligible. Outcomes included disease activity (e.g. relapses, MRI), course (e.g. relapsing-remitting/secondary-progressive [RR/SPMS]) and disability progression (e.g. using the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]). Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Results
Four longitudinal and nineteen cross-sectional studies were included, totaling 1760 persons with MS. Most were female (1237/1760, 70 %) and had RRMS (1378/1760, 78 %). The majority of studies (67 %;10/15) examining gut diversity (alpha or beta) did not find an association with disease activity, course or progression. However, several gut taxa exhibited significant associations with study outcomes, including eight that varied in consistent directions: a higher abundance of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidota and Roseburia inulinivorans were associated with better MS outcomes (e.g. lower EDSS scores), while higher abundances of Streptococcus, Clostridium nexile, Clostridium scindens and Collinsella aerofaciens were associated with worse outcomes (e.g. higher MRI lesion volumes).
Conclusions
Gut diversity was not associated with MS-related outcomes in most studies whereas several gut taxa were, including higher abundances of short chain-fatty acid producers (e.g. Bacteroidota) showing associations with lower EDSS scores. Most studies were cross-sectional, limiting interpretation of findings; longitudinal studies are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource.
A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.