The multiple sclerosis gut microbiome and disease activity: A systematic review

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple sclerosis and related disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2024.106151
Sophia Jette , Constance de Schaetzen , Chia-Chen Tsai , Helen Tremlett
{"title":"The multiple sclerosis gut microbiome and disease activity: A systematic review","authors":"Sophia Jette ,&nbsp;Constance de Schaetzen ,&nbsp;Chia-Chen Tsai ,&nbsp;Helen Tremlett","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.106151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The gut microbiome is a potential therapeutic target for multiple sclerosis (MS), yet its association with disease activity remains unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the relationship between the gut microbiome and MS disease activity, course, and disability progression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar (01/2011–02/2024) to identify relevant observational or interventional studies published in English. Case reports were ineligible. Outcomes included disease activity (e.g. relapses, MRI), course (e.g. relapsing-remitting/secondary-progressive [RR/SPMS]) and disability progression (e.g. using the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]). Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four longitudinal and nineteen cross-sectional studies were included, totaling 1760 persons with MS. Most were female (1237/1760, 70 %) and had RRMS (1378/1760, 78 %). The majority of studies (67 %;10/15) examining gut diversity (alpha or beta) did not find an association with disease activity, course or progression. However, several gut taxa exhibited significant associations with study outcomes, including eight that varied in consistent directions: a higher abundance of <em>Actinobacteria, Bacteroidota</em> and <em>Roseburia inulinivorans</em> were associated with better MS outcomes (e.g. lower EDSS scores), while higher abundances of <em>Streptococcus, Clostridium nexile, Clostridium scindens</em> and <em>Collinsella aerofaciens</em> were associated with worse outcomes (e.g. higher MRI lesion volumes).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Gut diversity was not associated with MS-related outcomes in most studies whereas several gut taxa were, including higher abundances of short chain-fatty acid producers (e.g. <em>Bacteroidota</em>) showing associations with lower EDSS scores. Most studies were cross-sectional, limiting interpretation of findings; longitudinal studies are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 106151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824007272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The gut microbiome is a potential therapeutic target for multiple sclerosis (MS), yet its association with disease activity remains unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the relationship between the gut microbiome and MS disease activity, course, and disability progression.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar (01/2011–02/2024) to identify relevant observational or interventional studies published in English. Case reports were ineligible. Outcomes included disease activity (e.g. relapses, MRI), course (e.g. relapsing-remitting/secondary-progressive [RR/SPMS]) and disability progression (e.g. using the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]). Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

Four longitudinal and nineteen cross-sectional studies were included, totaling 1760 persons with MS. Most were female (1237/1760, 70 %) and had RRMS (1378/1760, 78 %). The majority of studies (67 %;10/15) examining gut diversity (alpha or beta) did not find an association with disease activity, course or progression. However, several gut taxa exhibited significant associations with study outcomes, including eight that varied in consistent directions: a higher abundance of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidota and Roseburia inulinivorans were associated with better MS outcomes (e.g. lower EDSS scores), while higher abundances of Streptococcus, Clostridium nexile, Clostridium scindens and Collinsella aerofaciens were associated with worse outcomes (e.g. higher MRI lesion volumes).

Conclusions

Gut diversity was not associated with MS-related outcomes in most studies whereas several gut taxa were, including higher abundances of short chain-fatty acid producers (e.g. Bacteroidota) showing associations with lower EDSS scores. Most studies were cross-sectional, limiting interpretation of findings; longitudinal studies are warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症肠道微生物群与疾病活动:系统综述
背景肠道微生物组是多发性硬化症(MS)的潜在治疗靶点,但其与疾病活动的关系仍不清楚。我们系统地回顾了相关文献,以研究肠道微生物组与多发性硬化症疾病活动、病程和残疾进展之间的关系。方法我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science和谷歌学术(01/2011-02/2024),以确定用英语发表的相关观察性或干预性研究。病例报告不合格。研究结果包括疾病活动(如复发、核磁共振成像)、病程(如复发-缓解/继发性进展[RR/SPMS])和残疾进展(如使用扩展残疾状况量表[EDSS])。研究质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale)进行评估。大多数患者为女性(1237/1760,70%)和 RRMS 患者(1378/1760,78%)。大多数研究(67%;10/15)对肠道多样性(α或β)进行了检测,但未发现其与疾病活动、病程或进展有关联。不过,有几个肠道分类群与研究结果有显著关联,其中有八个分类群的变化方向一致:放线菌、类杆菌和Roseburia inulinivorans的丰度越高,多发性硬化症的预后越好(如EDSS评分越低),而链球菌、梭状芽孢杆菌、梭状芽孢杆菌和科林斯菌的丰度越高,预后越差(如MRI病灶体积越大)。结论在大多数研究中,肠道多样性与多发性硬化症的相关结果无关,而一些肠道分类群则与之相关,包括短链脂肪酸生产者(如类杆菌)的丰度较高与较低的 EDSS 评分有关。大多数研究都是横断面研究,限制了对研究结果的解释;有必要进行纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
814
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource. A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.
期刊最新文献
Strength training attenuates neuropathic pain by Preventing dendritic Spine dysgenesis through Suppressing Rac1 and inflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Adaptation, construct validity, and test-retest reliability of the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire for the Israeli multiple sclerosis population Incorporation of the central vein sign into the McDonald criteria Hypogammaglobulinemia and severe infections in Multiple Sclerosis patients on anti-CD20 agents: A multicentre study Curriculum innovation: Interactive educational workshop improves neurology resident knowledge of multiple sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1