Design, implementation, and evaluation of peer feedback to develop students’ critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2023

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101691
Xiaomeng Zeng , Latha Ravindran
{"title":"Design, implementation, and evaluation of peer feedback to develop students’ critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2023","authors":"Xiaomeng Zeng ,&nbsp;Latha Ravindran","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peer feedback, as one of the assessment techniques to develop critical thinking is now receiving more attention. Due to different instruction design factors in peer feedback, it is not that widely used. This systematic review analyzed studies using peer feedback to develop critical thinking from Web of Science and Scopus within the duration of 2010 to 2023. Through a systematic process of paper selection, the study selected 44 empirical studies in practical teaching. Generally, most studies used existing definitions of critical thinking in general knowledge, whereas most studies used multiple scaffolding to help learners understand and develop critical thinking in specific disciplines. The cooperative nature of peer feedback with the provision and reception of feedback between learners brings significant improvement in thinking. The review thus proposed an operational framework of critical thinking, as well as an instructional design of peer feedback to promote the development of critical thinking in global teaching.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer feedback, as one of the assessment techniques to develop critical thinking is now receiving more attention. Due to different instruction design factors in peer feedback, it is not that widely used. This systematic review analyzed studies using peer feedback to develop critical thinking from Web of Science and Scopus within the duration of 2010 to 2023. Through a systematic process of paper selection, the study selected 44 empirical studies in practical teaching. Generally, most studies used existing definitions of critical thinking in general knowledge, whereas most studies used multiple scaffolding to help learners understand and develop critical thinking in specific disciplines. The cooperative nature of peer feedback with the provision and reception of feedback between learners brings significant improvement in thinking. The review thus proposed an operational framework of critical thinking, as well as an instructional design of peer feedback to promote the development of critical thinking in global teaching.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旨在培养学生批判性思维的同伴反馈的设计、实施和评估:2010 年至 2023 年的系统回顾
同伴反馈作为培养批判性思维的评价技术之一,目前正受到越来越多的关注。由于同伴反馈的教学设计因素不同,其应用并不广泛。本系统性综述分析了 2010 年至 2023 年期间来自 Web of Science 和 Scopus 的利用同伴反馈培养批判性思维的研究。通过系统的论文筛选过程,本研究选取了 44 篇实践教学方面的实证研究。一般来说,大多数研究使用了常识中关于批判性思维的现有定义,而大多数研究使用了多种支架来帮助学习者理解和发展特定学科的批判性思维。通过学习者之间提供和接受反馈,同伴反馈的合作性质显著提高了思维能力。因此,综述提出了批判性思维的操作框架以及同伴反馈的教学设计,以促进全球教学中批判性思维的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Exploring the effects of scaffolded reflective learning on student teachers' design performance and reflective thinking How does supervisor support impact Chinese graduate students’ research creativity through research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation? – A multi-group analysis Physical Education Pre-Service Teachers as Design Thinkers: Exploring the Role of Divergent and Convergent Thinking and TPACK The interactive effect of integral and incidental emotions on creative metaphor performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1