Sex Disparities Affecting Postoperative Outcomes After Total Elbow Arthroplasty

Rohit Siddabattula BA , George Thomas MD , Urska Cvek ScD , Marjan Trutschl ScD , Edward Wu MD , Allison J. Rao MD
{"title":"Sex Disparities Affecting Postoperative Outcomes After Total Elbow Arthroplasty","authors":"Rohit Siddabattula BA ,&nbsp;George Thomas MD ,&nbsp;Urska Cvek ScD ,&nbsp;Marjan Trutschl ScD ,&nbsp;Edward Wu MD ,&nbsp;Allison J. Rao MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate sex disparities in 30-day postoperative outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files were queried for all patients who underwent a total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) between 2006 and 2020. Sex disparities in preoperative variables were studied using Fisher exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of postoperative outcomes for women in comparison with men.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 788 patients underwent a TEA in the period of 2006–2020. Of those, 180 were men, and 608 were women. We found an increase in TEAs performed each year with a predominance in females compared to males. Additionally, our work demonstrated increased statistically significant odds of a major adverse cardiac event (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), transfusions required (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), and return to the operating room (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001) as postoperative outcomes in females compared to males following TEA. Finally, we found no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups (<em>P</em> = 1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Following a TEA, women had higher adjusted postoperative odds of experiencing a major adverse cardiac event, requiring transfusion, and return to the operating room. No significant differences were found in wound outcomes, pulmonary outcomes, venous thromboembolic outcomes, sepsis, and length of stay. Overall mortality rates were similar between the two groups. Our study warrants further evaluation of the root cause of sex disparities in TEA outcomes and methods to improve care delivery to reduce those disparities.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Prognostic 2b.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 818-822"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124001312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate sex disparities in 30-day postoperative outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files were queried for all patients who underwent a total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) between 2006 and 2020. Sex disparities in preoperative variables were studied using Fisher exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of postoperative outcomes for women in comparison with men.

Results

A total of 788 patients underwent a TEA in the period of 2006–2020. Of those, 180 were men, and 608 were women. We found an increase in TEAs performed each year with a predominance in females compared to males. Additionally, our work demonstrated increased statistically significant odds of a major adverse cardiac event (P < .0001), transfusions required (P < .0001), and return to the operating room (P < .0001) as postoperative outcomes in females compared to males following TEA. Finally, we found no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups (P = 1).

Conclusions

Following a TEA, women had higher adjusted postoperative odds of experiencing a major adverse cardiac event, requiring transfusion, and return to the operating room. No significant differences were found in wound outcomes, pulmonary outcomes, venous thromboembolic outcomes, sepsis, and length of stay. Overall mortality rates were similar between the two groups. Our study warrants further evaluation of the root cause of sex disparities in TEA outcomes and methods to improve care delivery to reduce those disparities.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic 2b.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响全肘关节置换术后效果的性别差异
目的 研究全肘关节置换术术后 30 天结果的性别差异。方法 查询美国外科医生学会-国家外科质量改进计划的档案,了解 2006 年至 2020 年间接受全肘关节置换术 (TEA) 的所有患者。使用费舍尔精确检验对术前变量的性别差异进行了研究。使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定了女性与男性术后结果的调整几率比(aOR)。其中 180 人为男性,608 人为女性。我们发现进行 TEA 的人数逐年增加,且女性多于男性。此外,我们的研究表明,与男性相比,女性在 TEA 术后发生重大心脏不良事件(P < .0001)、需要输血(P < .0001)和返回手术室(P < .0001)的几率均有显著统计学意义。结论TEA术后,女性发生重大心脏不良事件、需要输血和返回手术室的调整后几率更高。在伤口预后、肺部预后、静脉血栓栓塞预后、败血症和住院时间方面没有发现明显差异。两组的总死亡率相似。我们的研究值得进一步评估TEA结果性别差异的根本原因,以及改善护理服务以减少这些差异的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Scaphoid Fractures and Nonunion: A Survey-based Review of Hand Surgeon’s Practice and the Evidence Hook of Hamate Regrowth After Surgical Excision: A Report of Two Cases Possible Bupivacaine Induced Hepatitis Following Wide Awake, Local Anesthesia, No Tourniquet Carpal Tunnel Surgery: A Case Report Digital Papillary Adenocarcinoma: A Case Presentation and Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1