ERISA Industry Committee urges Colorado to reconsider new mental health parity rules

{"title":"ERISA Industry Committee urges Colorado to reconsider new mental health parity rules","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/mhw.34261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC) last week submitted public comments on proposed regulations from the Colorado Division of Insurance aimed at administering parity for mental health and substance use disorder benefits, according to a Nov. 20 news release. ERIC's public comments strongly urge Colorado regulators to reconsider the proposed rules, cautioning that if the state rules conflict with future changes to federal law, it could lead to future compliance conflicts and undermine how employers administer benefit plans. Because underlying Colorado law adopts relevant federal regulations in this space, further state codification is unnecessary and could only lead to complications down the road. ERIC has been a leader in shaping federal mental health and substance use disorder benefit parity policy for many years, dating back to the enactment of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, the news release indicated. When the federal rule was issued in September, ERIC expressed concerns that the rule is unworkable for employers who choose to offer behavioral health benefits for their workers. ERIC is a national advocacy organization exclusively representing the largest employers in the United States in their capacity as sponsors of employee benefit plans for their nationwide workforces.</p>","PeriodicalId":100916,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Weekly","volume":"34 45","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhw.34261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC) last week submitted public comments on proposed regulations from the Colorado Division of Insurance aimed at administering parity for mental health and substance use disorder benefits, according to a Nov. 20 news release. ERIC's public comments strongly urge Colorado regulators to reconsider the proposed rules, cautioning that if the state rules conflict with future changes to federal law, it could lead to future compliance conflicts and undermine how employers administer benefit plans. Because underlying Colorado law adopts relevant federal regulations in this space, further state codification is unnecessary and could only lead to complications down the road. ERIC has been a leader in shaping federal mental health and substance use disorder benefit parity policy for many years, dating back to the enactment of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, the news release indicated. When the federal rule was issued in September, ERIC expressed concerns that the rule is unworkable for employers who choose to offer behavioral health benefits for their workers. ERIC is a national advocacy organization exclusively representing the largest employers in the United States in their capacity as sponsors of employee benefit plans for their nationwide workforces.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ERISA 行业委员会敦促科罗拉多州重新考虑新的心理健康对等规则
据 11 月 20 日发布的一份新闻稿称,ERISA 行业委员会(ERIC)上周就科罗拉多州保险部门提出的旨在管理精神健康和药物使用障碍同等福利的拟议法规提交了公开意见。ERIC 的公开评论强烈敦促科罗拉多州监管机构重新考虑拟议的规则,并警告说,如果该州的规则与联邦法律未来的变化相冲突,可能会导致未来的合规冲突,并破坏雇主管理福利计划的方式。由于科罗拉多州的基本法律采用了这一领域的相关联邦法规,因此没有必要进一步编纂州法规,这只会导致今后的复杂化。新闻稿指出,多年来,ERIC 一直是制定联邦精神健康和药物使用障碍福利均等政策的领导者,这可以追溯到《精神健康均等和成瘾平等法案》的颁布。9 月联邦规则发布时,ERIC 表示担心该规则对于选择为员工提供行为健康福利的雇主来说是行不通的。ERIC 是一个全国性的倡导组织,专门代表美国最大的雇主为其全国范围内的员工提供员工福利计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction In Case You Haven't Heard… DOJ agreement with Nevada reached for children with BH needs National MH coalition urges Congress to protect Medicaid, reject cuts Lawsuit: Unfounded MH claims launch probes of pregnant Vermonters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1