Zoe H. Tu, Allison N. Yun, Janardhana Gorthi, Ashrith Guha, Jill C. Krisl, Arvind Bhimaraj
{"title":"Terbutaline for Management of Relative Bradycardia Post-Orthotopic Heart Transplant: A Single Center Experience","authors":"Zoe H. Tu, Allison N. Yun, Janardhana Gorthi, Ashrith Guha, Jill C. Krisl, Arvind Bhimaraj","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Vagal nerve denervation during the heart transplant procedure results in higher resting heart rates in these recipients compared to the general population. Relative bradycardia (RB) is a common and often temporary post-operative complication that can be managed with agents like terbutaline; however, little data exist on the efficacy, safety, and necessity of long-term terbutaline use post-heart transplant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a single-center, retrospective, descriptive study conducted at a large academic medical center investigating oral terbutaline use for RB management in heart transplant recipients. Outcomes included time to and reason for terbutaline discontinuation post-transplant, adverse event rates, and permanent pacemaker (PPM) placement rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the 229 patients included, the median (IQR) time to terbutaline initiation was 8 (5, 12) days post-heart transplant, with a median (IQR) time to discontinuation of 56 (20, 96) days from the first dose. In most cases, terbutaline was successfully tapered off outpatient due to the resolution of RB. Tachyarrhythmias occurred in 29 (12.7%) patients without long-term sequelae. At 3 months post-transplant, PPM had been placed for chronotropic support in 15 patients (6.6%) with a median time (IQR) to PPM placement of 24 (19, 77) days from transplant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study's overall low PPM placement rate suggests that early sinus node dysfunction can be treated with pharmacotherapy without committing to a permanent device, and that terbutaline can be used safely in early post-heart transplant recipients. If patients require long-term chronotropic support, the risk-benefit of PPM placement versus continued terbutaline should be considered.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Vagal nerve denervation during the heart transplant procedure results in higher resting heart rates in these recipients compared to the general population. Relative bradycardia (RB) is a common and often temporary post-operative complication that can be managed with agents like terbutaline; however, little data exist on the efficacy, safety, and necessity of long-term terbutaline use post-heart transplant.
Methods
This was a single-center, retrospective, descriptive study conducted at a large academic medical center investigating oral terbutaline use for RB management in heart transplant recipients. Outcomes included time to and reason for terbutaline discontinuation post-transplant, adverse event rates, and permanent pacemaker (PPM) placement rates.
Results
In the 229 patients included, the median (IQR) time to terbutaline initiation was 8 (5, 12) days post-heart transplant, with a median (IQR) time to discontinuation of 56 (20, 96) days from the first dose. In most cases, terbutaline was successfully tapered off outpatient due to the resolution of RB. Tachyarrhythmias occurred in 29 (12.7%) patients without long-term sequelae. At 3 months post-transplant, PPM had been placed for chronotropic support in 15 patients (6.6%) with a median time (IQR) to PPM placement of 24 (19, 77) days from transplant.
Conclusion
This study's overall low PPM placement rate suggests that early sinus node dysfunction can be treated with pharmacotherapy without committing to a permanent device, and that terbutaline can be used safely in early post-heart transplant recipients. If patients require long-term chronotropic support, the risk-benefit of PPM placement versus continued terbutaline should be considered.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.