Greenhouse gas emissions from tillage practices and crop phases in a sugarbeet-based crop rotation

Upendra M. Sainju, William B. Stevens, Jalal D. Jabro, Brett L. Allen, William M. Iversen, Chengci Chen, Sikiru Y. Alasinrin
{"title":"Greenhouse gas emissions from tillage practices and crop phases in a sugarbeet-based crop rotation","authors":"Upendra M. Sainju,&nbsp;William B. Stevens,&nbsp;Jalal D. Jabro,&nbsp;Brett L. Allen,&nbsp;William M. Iversen,&nbsp;Chengci Chen,&nbsp;Sikiru Y. Alasinrin","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Information is needed on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to tillage and crop type on sugarbeet (<i>Beta vulgaris</i> L.)-based crop rotations. We measured CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions as affected by tillage (conventional till [CT], no-till [NT], and strip till [ST]) under sugarbeet and spring wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) phases of an irrigated sugarbeet–pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.)–spring wheat rotation from 2018 to 2021 in the US northern Great Plains. Greenhouse gases were measured using a static chamber at 3- to 28-day intervals, depending on plant growth and environmental conditions, throughout the year. The CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes peaked for 2–8 months immediately after tillage, planting, fertilization, intense precipitation, and irrigation. The CH<sub>4</sub> flux varied little, except for some peaks in the first year. Cumulative annual CO<sub>2</sub> flux was 19%–30% greater for CT than NT in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021, and 13% greater for CT than ST in 2020–2021. Cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O flux was 31%–36% greater for CT than ST in 2018–2019 and 2020–2021, but 33%–83% lower for sugarbeet than spring wheat in all years. Cumulative CH<sub>4</sub> flux was 83% lower for CT than NT and 68% lower for sugarbeet than spring wheat in 2018–2019. The GHG balance was 15%–23% greater for CT than NT and ST in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 and 31% greater under sugarbeet than spring wheat in 2018–2019. No-tillage can reduce GHG emissions compared to conventional tillage, and sugarbeet can reduce N<sub>2</sub>O emissions compared to spring wheat in sugarbeet-based crop rotations.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20786","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information is needed on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to tillage and crop type on sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.)-based crop rotations. We measured CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions as affected by tillage (conventional till [CT], no-till [NT], and strip till [ST]) under sugarbeet and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) phases of an irrigated sugarbeet–pea (Pisum sativum L.)–spring wheat rotation from 2018 to 2021 in the US northern Great Plains. Greenhouse gases were measured using a static chamber at 3- to 28-day intervals, depending on plant growth and environmental conditions, throughout the year. The CO2 and N2O fluxes peaked for 2–8 months immediately after tillage, planting, fertilization, intense precipitation, and irrigation. The CH4 flux varied little, except for some peaks in the first year. Cumulative annual CO2 flux was 19%–30% greater for CT than NT in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021, and 13% greater for CT than ST in 2020–2021. Cumulative N2O flux was 31%–36% greater for CT than ST in 2018–2019 and 2020–2021, but 33%–83% lower for sugarbeet than spring wheat in all years. Cumulative CH4 flux was 83% lower for CT than NT and 68% lower for sugarbeet than spring wheat in 2018–2019. The GHG balance was 15%–23% greater for CT than NT and ST in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 and 31% greater under sugarbeet than spring wheat in 2018–2019. No-tillage can reduce GHG emissions compared to conventional tillage, and sugarbeet can reduce N2O emissions compared to spring wheat in sugarbeet-based crop rotations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以甜菜为基础的轮作中耕作方法和作物阶段的温室气体排放
我们需要了解以甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.)为基础的作物轮作中因耕作和作物类型而导致的温室气体(GHG)排放情况。我们测量了 2018 年至 2021 年美国北部大平原灌溉甜菜-豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)-春小麦轮作中受耕作(常规耕作 [CT]、免耕 [NT] 和带状耕作 [ST])影响的二氧化碳、一氧化二氮和甲烷排放量。根据植物生长和环境条件的不同,全年使用静态室每隔 3 到 28 天测量一次温室气体。二氧化碳和一氧化二氮通量在耕作、种植、施肥、强降水和灌溉后的 2 至 8 个月内达到峰值。除了第一年出现一些峰值外,CH4 通量变化不大。2019-2020 年和 2020-2021 年,CT 的二氧化碳年累积通量比 NT 高 19%-30%,2020-2021 年,CT 比 ST 高 13%。在 2018-2019 年和 2020-2021 年,CT 的累计 N2O 通量比 ST 高 31%-36%,但在所有年份,甜菜的 N2O 通量比春小麦低 33%-83%。2018-2019 年,CT 的累计 CH4 通量比 NT 低 83%,甜菜比春小麦低 68%。在 2019-2020 年和 2020-2021 年,CT 的温室气体平衡比 NT 和 ST 高 15%-23%,在 2018-2019 年,甜菜的温室气体平衡比春小麦高 31%。与传统耕作相比,免耕可以减少温室气体排放,在以甜菜为主的作物轮作中,与春小麦相比,甜菜可以减少一氧化二氮的排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A portable low-cost incubation chamber for real-time characterization of soil respiration Novel slow-release fertilizer promotes nitrogen circularity while increasing soil organic carbon Erratum to: Effects of maize residue and biochar applications on soil δ13C and organic carbon sources in a subtropical paddy rice ecosystem Microbial inocula enhance effects of biochar amendments on crop productivity, soil health, and microbial communities: A meta-analysis Comparison of laser diffractometry and pipetting methods for particle size determination: A pilot study on the implications of result discrepancies on soil classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1