The Prognostic Value of Serum Soluble Programmed Death 1 (sPD-1) and Programmed Death Ligand 1 (sPD-L1) in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis About Cohort Studies

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70178
Qiyao Yu, Jie Li, Wenjie Mao, Zheng Li, Xuan Li, Bin Li
{"title":"The Prognostic Value of Serum Soluble Programmed Death 1 (sPD-1) and Programmed Death Ligand 1 (sPD-L1) in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis About Cohort Studies","authors":"Qiyao Yu,&nbsp;Jie Li,&nbsp;Wenjie Mao,&nbsp;Zheng Li,&nbsp;Xuan Li,&nbsp;Bin Li","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>There are still no useful biomarkers for the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In the prognosis of some kinds of cancer, soluble programmed death 1 (sPD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) have demonstrated statistical significance, but the prognostic value of serum sPD-L1 and sPD-1 remains unclear in ESCC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here, a meta-analysis was performed to estimate the prognostic value of sPD-L1 and sPD-1 in ESCC. To obtain eligible studies, we searched mainstream databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and CNKI), and the survival data including hazard ratios (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) from included literature were extracted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Six articles were included, including 645 patients with ESCC. The statistical result of this meta-analysis indicated that serum sPD-1 had no significant correlation with overall survival (OS) of patients with ESCC (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Patients with ESCC with high concentrations of serum sPD-L1 demonstrated a significantly poor prognosis (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.42–2.11, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Higher levels of serum sPD-L1 may predict poor OS in ESCC patients, which may be a promising and credible prognostic biomarker for esophageal cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"7 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70178","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

There are still no useful biomarkers for the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In the prognosis of some kinds of cancer, soluble programmed death 1 (sPD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) have demonstrated statistical significance, but the prognostic value of serum sPD-L1 and sPD-1 remains unclear in ESCC.

Methods

Here, a meta-analysis was performed to estimate the prognostic value of sPD-L1 and sPD-1 in ESCC. To obtain eligible studies, we searched mainstream databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and CNKI), and the survival data including hazard ratios (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) from included literature were extracted.

Results

Six articles were included, including 645 patients with ESCC. The statistical result of this meta-analysis indicated that serum sPD-1 had no significant correlation with overall survival (OS) of patients with ESCC (p > 0.05). Patients with ESCC with high concentrations of serum sPD-L1 demonstrated a significantly poor prognosis (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.42–2.11, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Higher levels of serum sPD-L1 may predict poor OS in ESCC patients, which may be a promising and credible prognostic biomarker for esophageal cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食管鳞状细胞癌血清可溶性程序性死亡 1 (sPD-1) 和程序性死亡配体 1 (sPD-L1) 的预后价值:关于队列研究的系统综述和荟萃分析
背景和目的 目前尚无有效的生物标志物用于预测食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的预后。在某些癌症的预后中,可溶性程序性死亡1(sPD-1)和程序性死亡配体1(sPD-L1)具有统计学意义,但血清sPD-L1和sPD-1在ESCC中的预后价值仍不明确。 方法 在此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以估计 sPD-L1 和 sPD-1 在 ESCC 中的预后价值。为了获得符合条件的研究,我们检索了主流数据库(PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Web of Science、万方数据和 CNKI),并从纳入的文献中提取了包括危险比(HR)及其 95% 置信区间(95% CI)在内的生存数据。 结果 共纳入6篇文章,包括645名ESCC患者。荟萃分析的统计结果表明,血清sPD-1与ESCC患者的总生存率(OS)无显著相关性(p > 0.05)。血清 sPD-L1 浓度较高的 ESCC 患者预后明显较差(HR = 1.73,95% CI:1.42-2.11,p < 0.001)。 结论 血清sPD-L1水平较高可预测ESCC患者较差的OS,这可能是食管癌一种有希望的、可信的预后生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy and Safety of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma in Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials The Prognostic Value of Serum Soluble Programmed Death 1 (sPD-1) and Programmed Death Ligand 1 (sPD-L1) in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis About Cohort Studies Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Sub-Saharan Africa: Surgical Management Outcomes, Gaps, and Future Prospects: A Narrative Review Development and Preliminary Testing of the Staffordshire Questionnaire for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (SQ-AIS): Content and Face Validity Psychological flexibility as a mediator in the relationship between resilience and academic burnout among Doctor of Physical Therapy students: A structural equation modeling study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1