Fuelling injustice? Safeguarding equity in anti-fossil fuel norms

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1111/1758-5899.13451
Anisha Nazareth, Zoha Shawoo, Cleo Verkuijl, Harro van Asselt
{"title":"Fuelling injustice? Safeguarding equity in anti-fossil fuel norms","authors":"Anisha Nazareth,&nbsp;Zoha Shawoo,&nbsp;Cleo Verkuijl,&nbsp;Harro van Asselt","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores anti-fossil fuel norms (AFFNs), which set behavioral standards for phasing out practices and processes across the fossil fuel supply chain. In recent years, AFFNs have emerged and become increasingly institutionalized in global climate governance. However, they remain contested and have not yet achieved widespread acceptance. Much of the contestation concerns the perceived equity of these norms. Drawing on insights from the literature on AFFNs and expert interviews, this article investigates equity-related issues that arise in the context of four key AFFNs: phasing out coal-fired power, phasing out oil and gas, ending public financing for fossil fuels, and reforming fossil fuel subsidies. We find that each of these norms is well placed to contribute to a shift away from a fossil fuel-based economy. However, these norms are often framed in ways that do not account for the distributional impacts of this shift, which may lead to unintended and inequitable consequences. We conclude that AFFNs need to be developed and deployed to actively consider the needs of marginalized communities. Policymakers and non-governmental organizations can work together to develop norms that prioritize addressing equity and distributional justice concerns in the transition away from fossil fuels.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"15 5","pages":"979-988"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores anti-fossil fuel norms (AFFNs), which set behavioral standards for phasing out practices and processes across the fossil fuel supply chain. In recent years, AFFNs have emerged and become increasingly institutionalized in global climate governance. However, they remain contested and have not yet achieved widespread acceptance. Much of the contestation concerns the perceived equity of these norms. Drawing on insights from the literature on AFFNs and expert interviews, this article investigates equity-related issues that arise in the context of four key AFFNs: phasing out coal-fired power, phasing out oil and gas, ending public financing for fossil fuels, and reforming fossil fuel subsidies. We find that each of these norms is well placed to contribute to a shift away from a fossil fuel-based economy. However, these norms are often framed in ways that do not account for the distributional impacts of this shift, which may lead to unintended and inequitable consequences. We conclude that AFFNs need to be developed and deployed to actively consider the needs of marginalized communities. Policymakers and non-governmental organizations can work together to develop norms that prioritize addressing equity and distributional justice concerns in the transition away from fossil fuels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助长不公正?在反化石燃料规范中保障公平
本文探讨了反化石燃料规范(AFFNs),它为逐步淘汰整个化石燃料供应链中的做法和流程设定了行为标准。近年来,反化石燃料规范已经出现,并在全球气候治理中日益制度化。然而,它们仍然存在争议,尚未获得广泛接受。大部分争议涉及这些规范的公平性。本文借鉴了有关 "可持续发展筹资网络 "的文献和专家访谈的观点,研究了在四个关键的 "可持续发展筹资网络 "背景下出现的与公平相关的问题:逐步淘汰燃煤发电、逐步淘汰石油和天然气、终止化石燃料的公共融资以及改革化石燃料补贴。我们发现,这些准则中的每一项都能很好地促进经济从以化石燃料为基础向以化石燃料为基础转变。然而,这些准则的制定方式往往没有考虑到这种转变对分配的影响,这可能会导致意想不到的不公平后果。我们的结论是,需要制定和部署非洲森林论坛网络,以积极考虑边缘化社区的需求。政策制定者和非政府组织可以共同努力,制定规范,优先解决在从化石燃料向非化石燃料过渡过程中的公平和分配正义问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Islamic Moral Economy: Bringing Back Substantive Morality to Humanise Islamic Finance Aligning Sustainable Finance and Fintech to Promote an Integrated Approach to Refugee Finance Islamic Instruments for Refugee Financing: The IsDB and UNHCR Collaborative Approach Financial Exclusion, Soft Segregation and Moral Constraints as Drivers of Entrepreneurial Activities in Scottish Muslim Immigrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1