Competition and Facilitation Influence Central Place Foraging Ecology in a Colonial Marine Predator

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecology and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1002/ece3.70494
Liam P. Langley, Sam L. Cox, Samantha C. Patrick, Stephen C. Votier
{"title":"Competition and Facilitation Influence Central Place Foraging Ecology in a Colonial Marine Predator","authors":"Liam P. Langley,&nbsp;Sam L. Cox,&nbsp;Samantha C. Patrick,&nbsp;Stephen C. Votier","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coloniality is strongly shaped by aspects of social foraging behaviour. For example, colonies may be important sources of information, while food competition may increase foraging efforts and limit colony size. Understanding foraging ecology considering these apparent trade-offs is required to develop a better understanding of colonial living. We combined animal-borne GPS, cameras and dive recorders to study social foraging in breeding adult northern gannets <i>Morus bassanus</i>—a wide-ranging colonial seabird. We first tested for indirect evidence of prey depletion around the colony by estimating dive location, depth and duration. Next, we tested for sociality during different behaviours (commuting, foraging and resting) and distance from the colony. Finally, we quantified flocks of inbound and outbound birds to compare social foraging between outbound and inbound legs of the commute. Dive probability and depth (<i>n</i> = 46 individuals; <i>n</i> = 1590 dives) increased with distance from the colony, creating dive clusters at ~100 and 180 km consistent with conspecific prey depletion. Camera stills (<i>n</i> = 8 individuals; <i>n</i> = 7495 images) show gannets are highly social, but this varied among behaviours. Sociality was highest during foraging and commuting; especially inbound and social foraging was more likely far from the colony. Gannets were equally likely to be solitary or social when leaving the colony but returning birds were more likely in larger flocks. In summary, despite experiencing intraspecific competition for food, gannets engage in dynamic, context-dependent social foraging associations. Conspecifics aggregated far from the colony possibly because of a prey depletion halo closer to home, but this provided potential benefits via local enhancement and by returning to the colony in flocks. Our results therefore illustrate how competition may, paradoxically, facilitate some aspects of group foraging in colonial animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"14 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.70494","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coloniality is strongly shaped by aspects of social foraging behaviour. For example, colonies may be important sources of information, while food competition may increase foraging efforts and limit colony size. Understanding foraging ecology considering these apparent trade-offs is required to develop a better understanding of colonial living. We combined animal-borne GPS, cameras and dive recorders to study social foraging in breeding adult northern gannets Morus bassanus—a wide-ranging colonial seabird. We first tested for indirect evidence of prey depletion around the colony by estimating dive location, depth and duration. Next, we tested for sociality during different behaviours (commuting, foraging and resting) and distance from the colony. Finally, we quantified flocks of inbound and outbound birds to compare social foraging between outbound and inbound legs of the commute. Dive probability and depth (n = 46 individuals; n = 1590 dives) increased with distance from the colony, creating dive clusters at ~100 and 180 km consistent with conspecific prey depletion. Camera stills (n = 8 individuals; n = 7495 images) show gannets are highly social, but this varied among behaviours. Sociality was highest during foraging and commuting; especially inbound and social foraging was more likely far from the colony. Gannets were equally likely to be solitary or social when leaving the colony but returning birds were more likely in larger flocks. In summary, despite experiencing intraspecific competition for food, gannets engage in dynamic, context-dependent social foraging associations. Conspecifics aggregated far from the colony possibly because of a prey depletion halo closer to home, but this provided potential benefits via local enhancement and by returning to the colony in flocks. Our results therefore illustrate how competition may, paradoxically, facilitate some aspects of group foraging in colonial animals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞争和促进作用影响殖民地海洋掠食者的中心觅食生态学
社会觅食行为在很大程度上决定了群落性。例如,群落可能是重要的信息来源,而食物竞争可能会增加觅食努力并限制群落规模。要更好地理解觅食生态学,就必须考虑到这些明显的权衡。我们结合动物携带的全球定位系统、照相机和潜水记录仪,研究了繁殖期成年北海鸥的社会性觅食活动--北海鸥是一种分布广泛的殖民地海鸟。首先,我们通过估算潜水位置、深度和持续时间来检测繁殖地周围猎物枯竭的间接证据。接着,我们测试了不同行为(通勤、觅食和休息)期间的社会性以及与鸟群的距离。最后,我们对进港鸟群和出港鸟群进行了量化,以比较出港鸟群和进港鸟群在通勤过程中的社会性觅食行为。潜水概率和深度(n = 46 个个体;n = 1590 次潜水)随与鸟群的距离增加而增加,在 ~100 和 180 km 处形成潜水群,这与同种猎物枯竭一致。照相机拍摄的照片(n = 8 个个体;n = 7495 张图像)显示,巨嘴鸟具有高度的社会性,但不同行为的社会性各不相同。在觅食和通勤期间,社交性最高;特别是在远离群落的地方,进港和社交觅食的可能性更大。在离开繁殖地时,燕鸥独处或社交的可能性相同,但返回的燕鸥更可能成群结队。总之,尽管经历了种内食物竞争,大嘴蝠仍参与了动态的、依赖环境的社会性觅食活动。同种鸟类聚集在离鸟群较远的地方,这可能是因为近处有猎物枯竭的光环,但这也能通过提高当地的食物质量和成群返回鸟群而带来潜在的益处。因此,我们的研究结果说明了竞争是如何在矛盾的情况下促进群居动物群体觅食的某些方面的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
期刊最新文献
Land Use and Climate Change Accelerate the Loss of Habitat and Ecological Corridor to Reeves's Pheasant (Syrmaticus reevesii) in China The Hunger Games: Stable Isotopes Indicate Winter Inter-Guild Competition for Resources by Marine Meso-Predators in the Sub-Arctic North Pacific Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on the Distribution of Endangered and Endemic Changnienia amoena (Orchidaceae) Using Ensemble Modeling and Gap Analysis in China Temporal Dynamics of Species Richness and Composition in a Peri-Urban Tropical Frog Community in Central Brazil Diversity of the Obligate Gut Bacteria Indicates Host–Symbiont Coevolution at the Population Level in the Plataspid Stinkbug Megacopta cribraria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1