The Association of Electrical Risk Score with Prognosis in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Coronary Angiography.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Anatolian Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4726
Ali Nizami Elmas, Halil Fedai, Kenan Toprak, Mustafa Begenç Taşcanov, İbrahim Halil Altıparmak, Asuman Biçer, Recep Demirbağ, Zülkif Tanrıverdi
{"title":"The Association of Electrical Risk Score with Prognosis in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Coronary Angiography.","authors":"Ali Nizami Elmas, Halil Fedai, Kenan Toprak, Mustafa Begenç Taşcanov, İbrahim Halil Altıparmak, Asuman Biçer, Recep Demirbağ, Zülkif Tanrıverdi","doi":"10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute coronary syndromes are the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Electrical risk score (ERS) is a novel electrocardiographic risk scoring system. The prognostic importance of ERS in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients is unknown. We aimed to determine the association of ERS with in-hospital prognosis in NSTEMI patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 427 consecutive NSTEMI patients undergoing CAG were enrolled in this study. Six parameters comprised ERS: pulse rate >75, left ventricular hypertrophy according to Sokolow-Lyon criteria, QRS transition zone ≥V4, corrected QT (QTc) interval >450 for men and >460 for women, T peak to T end interval (Tp-e) >89 ms, and frontal QRS-T angle >90°. The ERS was calculated according to the number of abnormal findings in electrocardiogram. The study population was divided into 2 groups as ERS <3 and ≥3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found between ERS ≥3 and <3 groups in terms of demographic characteristics. However, patients with ERS ≥3 had significantly higher maximum troponin (P < .001), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (P = .002), and global registry of acute coronary events (P < .001) risk scores and 3-vessel disease frequency (P = .001), whereas they had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (P < .001). These patients also had higher frequency of in-hospital mortality (P < .001) and adverse events. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ERS (OR = 1.790, 95% CI: 1.036-3.095, P = .037) was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The frequency of in-hospital adverse events and mortality was significantly higher in NSTEMI patients with an ERS ≥3 at admission. This simple electrocardiographic risk marker may help identify patients at higher cardiac risk in patients presenting with NSTEMI and identify patients who may need early coronary intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7835,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute coronary syndromes are the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Electrical risk score (ERS) is a novel electrocardiographic risk scoring system. The prognostic importance of ERS in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients is unknown. We aimed to determine the association of ERS with in-hospital prognosis in NSTEMI patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG).

Methods: A total of 427 consecutive NSTEMI patients undergoing CAG were enrolled in this study. Six parameters comprised ERS: pulse rate >75, left ventricular hypertrophy according to Sokolow-Lyon criteria, QRS transition zone ≥V4, corrected QT (QTc) interval >450 for men and >460 for women, T peak to T end interval (Tp-e) >89 ms, and frontal QRS-T angle >90°. The ERS was calculated according to the number of abnormal findings in electrocardiogram. The study population was divided into 2 groups as ERS <3 and ≥3.

Results: No significant difference was found between ERS ≥3 and <3 groups in terms of demographic characteristics. However, patients with ERS ≥3 had significantly higher maximum troponin (P < .001), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (P = .002), and global registry of acute coronary events (P < .001) risk scores and 3-vessel disease frequency (P = .001), whereas they had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (P < .001). These patients also had higher frequency of in-hospital mortality (P < .001) and adverse events. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ERS (OR = 1.790, 95% CI: 1.036-3.095, P = .037) was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion: The frequency of in-hospital adverse events and mortality was significantly higher in NSTEMI patients with an ERS ≥3 at admission. This simple electrocardiographic risk marker may help identify patients at higher cardiac risk in patients presenting with NSTEMI and identify patients who may need early coronary intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受冠状动脉造影术的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的电气风险评分与预后的关系。
背景:急性冠状动脉综合征是导致全球死亡的主要原因。电风险评分(ERS)是一种新型心电图风险评分系统。ERS对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者预后的重要性尚不清楚。我们旨在确定接受冠状动脉造影术(CAG)的 NSTEMI 患者的 ERS 与院内预后的关系:本研究共纳入了 427 名连续接受冠状动脉造影术(CAG)的 NSTEMI 患者。ERS由六个参数组成:脉搏率>75、左心室肥厚(根据Sokolow-Lyon标准)、QRS过渡区≥V4、校正QT(QTc)间期男性>450,女性>460、T峰至T终间期(Tp-e)>89 ms、额QRS-T角>90°。ERS 根据心电图异常结果的数量计算。研究对象按 ERS 结果分为两组:ERS≥3组与结论组无明显差异:入院时 ERS≥3 的 NSTEMI 患者发生院内不良事件和死亡率的频率明显更高。这一简单的心电图风险标志物可帮助识别NSTEMI患者中心脏风险较高的患者,并识别可能需要早期冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology is an international monthly periodical on cardiology published on independent, unbiased, double-blinded and peer-review principles. The journal’s publication language is English. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology aims to publish qualified and original clinical, experimental and basic research on cardiology at the international level. The journal’s scope also covers editorial comments, reviews of innovations in medical education and practice, case reports, original images, scientific letters, educational articles, letters to the editor, articles on publication ethics, diagnostic puzzles, and issues in social cardiology. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents, and general practitioners working in the fields of adult cardiology, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery and internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy with Half-Dose Recombinant Human Prourokinase Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Systematic Review and Analysis of Brucella Endocarditis Cases. Does a Single Nerve Conduction Study Enough to Say Transradial Angiography Is Safe for Peripheral Nerve Damages or Not? Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Does Single Nerve Conduction Study Enough to Say Transradial Angiography Is Safe for Peripheral Nerve Damages or Not?''. Valve-in-valve TAVI, Brucella Endocarditis and more….
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1