Incidence of side effects associated with acetaminophen in people aged 65 years or more: a prospective cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Arthritis Care & Research Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1002/acr.25471
Jaspreet Kaur, Georgina Nakafero, Abhishek Abhishek, Christen Mallen, Michael Doherty, Weiya Zhang
{"title":"Incidence of side effects associated with acetaminophen in people aged 65 years or more: a prospective cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.","authors":"Jaspreet Kaur, Georgina Nakafero, Abhishek Abhishek, Christen Mallen, Michael Doherty, Weiya Zhang","doi":"10.1002/acr.25471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main objective of this study is to examine the safety of oral acetaminophen at its therapeutic dose in adults aged 65 years or more.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based cohort study used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink-Gold data. Participants were aged ≥65 years registered with a UK general practice for at least 12 months between 1998 and 2018. Acetaminophen exposure was defined as at-least two acetaminophen prescriptions within six-months of the first acetaminophen prescription, the first prescription date being the index-date. Acetaminophen non-exposure was defined as the absence of two acetaminophen prescriptions within six-months over the study period. We calculated propensity-score (PS) for acetaminophen prescription and undertook inverse probability treatment weighted (IPTW) using PS and PS-matched analyses to account for confounding. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. The adjusted hazard-ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence-interval (CI) were calculated using the Cox-proportional hazards regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 180,483 acetaminophen-users and 402,478 non-users were included in this study. Acetaminophen use was associated with an increased risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (aHR 1.24; 95% CI 1.16, 1.34), uncomplicated peptic-ulcers (aHR 1.20; 95% CI 1.10, 1.31), lower gastrointestinal-bleeding (aHR 1.36; 95% CI 1.29, 1.46), heart-failure (aHR 1.09; 95% CI 1.06, 1.13), hypertension (aHR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04, 1.11), and chronic kidney disease (aHR 1.19; 95% CI 1.13, 1.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite its perceived safety, acetaminophen is associated with several serious complications. Given its minimal analgesic effectiveness, the use of acetaminophen as the first-line oral analgesic for long-term conditions in older people requires careful reconsideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of this study is to examine the safety of oral acetaminophen at its therapeutic dose in adults aged 65 years or more.

Methods: This population-based cohort study used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink-Gold data. Participants were aged ≥65 years registered with a UK general practice for at least 12 months between 1998 and 2018. Acetaminophen exposure was defined as at-least two acetaminophen prescriptions within six-months of the first acetaminophen prescription, the first prescription date being the index-date. Acetaminophen non-exposure was defined as the absence of two acetaminophen prescriptions within six-months over the study period. We calculated propensity-score (PS) for acetaminophen prescription and undertook inverse probability treatment weighted (IPTW) using PS and PS-matched analyses to account for confounding. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. The adjusted hazard-ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence-interval (CI) were calculated using the Cox-proportional hazards regression model.

Results: In total, 180,483 acetaminophen-users and 402,478 non-users were included in this study. Acetaminophen use was associated with an increased risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (aHR 1.24; 95% CI 1.16, 1.34), uncomplicated peptic-ulcers (aHR 1.20; 95% CI 1.10, 1.31), lower gastrointestinal-bleeding (aHR 1.36; 95% CI 1.29, 1.46), heart-failure (aHR 1.09; 95% CI 1.06, 1.13), hypertension (aHR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04, 1.11), and chronic kidney disease (aHR 1.19; 95% CI 1.13, 1.24).

Conclusion: Despite its perceived safety, acetaminophen is associated with several serious complications. Given its minimal analgesic effectiveness, the use of acetaminophen as the first-line oral analgesic for long-term conditions in older people requires careful reconsideration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
65 岁及以上人群对乙酰氨基酚相关副作用的发生率:利用临床实践研究数据链接数据进行的前瞻性队列研究。
研究目的本研究的主要目的是检查 65 岁及以上成年人口服对乙酰氨基酚治疗剂量的安全性:这项基于人群的队列研究使用了临床实践研究数据-金数据。参与者年龄≥65岁,1998年至2018年期间在英国全科诊所注册至少12个月。对乙酰氨基酚暴露的定义是,在首次开具对乙酰氨基酚处方后的六个月内至少开具过两次对乙酰氨基酚处方,首次开具处方日期为索引日期。对乙酰氨基酚非暴露定义为在研究期间的 6 个月内没有两次对乙酰氨基酚处方。我们计算了对乙酰氨基酚处方的倾向分数(PS),并利用倾向分数和倾向分数匹配分析进行了逆概率治疗加权(IPTW),以考虑混杂因素。缺失数据采用多重估算法处理。采用 Cox 比例危险度回归模型计算调整后危险度比(aHR)和 95% 置信区间(CI):本研究共纳入了 180,483 名对乙酰氨基酚使用者和 402,478 名非使用者。使用对乙酰氨基酚与消化性溃疡出血(aHR 1.24;95% CI 1.16,1.34)、无并发症消化性溃疡(aHR 1.20;95% CI 1.10,1.31)、下消化道出血(aHR 1.36;95% CI 1.29,1.46)、心脏病(aHR 1.09;95% CI 1.06,1.13)、高血压(aHR 1.07;95% CI 1.04,1.11)和慢性肾病(aHR 1.19;95% CI 1.13,1.24):结论:尽管对乙酰氨基酚被认为是安全的,但它与多种严重并发症有关。鉴于对乙酰氨基酚的镇痛效果微乎其微,因此需要重新慎重考虑将对乙酰氨基酚作为治疗老年人长期疾病的一线口服镇痛药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
期刊最新文献
Integrating Patient Advocacy Groups in the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Reply to: "Integrating Patient Advocacy Groups in the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines". Incidence of side effects associated with acetaminophen in people aged 65 years or more: a prospective cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Introduction to the Special Theme Issue: Environmental & Geographical Factors & Rheumatic Disease. Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Practices of Graduates of a Blended-Learning Program: A Survey of Rheumatologists From the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1