Reliability and Validity of Measuring the Strength of the Chin-Tuck Maneuver in Community-Dwelling Older Adults as a Means of Evaluating Swallowing-Related Muscle Strength.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.3390/geriatrics9060148
Naoto Kamide, Takeshi Murakami, Masataka Ando, Takuya Sawada, Wakana Hata, Miki Sakamoto
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of Measuring the Strength of the Chin-Tuck Maneuver in Community-Dwelling Older Adults as a Means of Evaluating Swallowing-Related Muscle Strength.","authors":"Naoto Kamide, Takeshi Murakami, Masataka Ando, Takuya Sawada, Wakana Hata, Miki Sakamoto","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics9060148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The chin-tuck maneuver has been suggested to increase suprahyoid muscle activation, but a method to measure the strength of the chin-tuck maneuver has not been established. We developed a method to measure the strength of the chin-tuck maneuver (chin-tuck strength) and examined the reliability and validity of chin-tuck-strength measurement in community-dwelling older adults. <b>Participants and Methods</b>: The participants were 233 older adults aged ≥65 years without dysphagia or physical disability. Chin-tuck strength was measured twice consecutively using the developed device, and reproducibility was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). In addition, maximum tongue pressure, oral diadochokinesis, grip strength, knee extension strength, and the timed up and go test (TUGT) were measured as indices of swallowing-related muscle function and appendicular muscle function. The associations of chin-tuck strength with swallowing-related muscle function and appendicular muscle function were analyzed statistically. <b>Results</b>: The ICCs for chin-tuck strength were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.88) in males and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-0.93) in females. Chin-tuck strength was significantly associated with maximum tongue pressure, grip strength, knee extension strength, and TUGT. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study suggests that chin-tuck strength is a reliable and valid assessment of swallowing-related muscle strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9060148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The chin-tuck maneuver has been suggested to increase suprahyoid muscle activation, but a method to measure the strength of the chin-tuck maneuver has not been established. We developed a method to measure the strength of the chin-tuck maneuver (chin-tuck strength) and examined the reliability and validity of chin-tuck-strength measurement in community-dwelling older adults. Participants and Methods: The participants were 233 older adults aged ≥65 years without dysphagia or physical disability. Chin-tuck strength was measured twice consecutively using the developed device, and reproducibility was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). In addition, maximum tongue pressure, oral diadochokinesis, grip strength, knee extension strength, and the timed up and go test (TUGT) were measured as indices of swallowing-related muscle function and appendicular muscle function. The associations of chin-tuck strength with swallowing-related muscle function and appendicular muscle function were analyzed statistically. Results: The ICCs for chin-tuck strength were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.88) in males and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-0.93) in females. Chin-tuck strength was significantly associated with maximum tongue pressure, grip strength, knee extension strength, and TUGT. Conclusions: This study suggests that chin-tuck strength is a reliable and valid assessment of swallowing-related muscle strength.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量社区老年人收下巴动作强度的可靠性和有效性,以此评估与吞咽有关的肌肉强度。
背景:有人认为缩颏动作可以增加舌骨上肌的激活,但缩颏动作强度的测量方法尚未建立。我们开发了一种测量收颏动作强度(收颏强度)的方法,并研究了在社区居住的老年人中测量收颏强度的可靠性和有效性。参与者和方法:参与者为 233 名年龄≥65 岁、无吞咽困难或身体残疾的老年人。使用开发的设备连续两次测量颏吮强度,并使用类内相关系数(ICC)分析重现性。此外,还测量了最大舌压、口腔舒张运动、握力、膝关节伸展力和定时起立行走试验(TUGT),作为吞咽相关肌肉功能和附属肌肉功能的指标。通过统计学方法分析了收颏力量与吞咽相关肌肉功能和阑尾肌肉功能之间的关系。结果男性收颏力量的 ICC 值为 0.82(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.73-0.88),女性为 0.87(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.70-0.93)。收颏力量与最大舌压、握力、伸膝力量和 TUGT 有明显相关性。结论本研究表明,吸颏力量是一种可靠、有效的吞咽相关肌力评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
Kidney Transplantation in Older Recipients Regarding Surgical and Clinical Complications, Outcomes, and Survival: A Literature Review. MRI-Based Phenotyping for Osteosarcopenic Adiposity in Subjects from a Population-Based Cohort. Mortality in Newly Admitted Nursing Home Older Adults with Dementia in France: A Post Hoc Analysis from an Observational Study in the Bordeaux Region. Reliability and Validity of Measuring the Strength of the Chin-Tuck Maneuver in Community-Dwelling Older Adults as a Means of Evaluating Swallowing-Related Muscle Strength. Dyadic Coping in Aging: Linking Self-Perceptions of Aging to Depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1