Cognitive Function in Frail Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study Using Secondary Data Analysis.

Q1 Nursing International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2024-11-11 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2023-085
Emerson Sebastião, Vitor A A A Siqueira, Jemimah O Bakare, Mahgolzahra Kamari, Robert W Motl
{"title":"Cognitive Function in Frail Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study Using Secondary Data Analysis.","authors":"Emerson Sebastião, Vitor A A A Siqueira, Jemimah O Bakare, Mahgolzahra Kamari, Robert W Motl","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2023-085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies addressing frailty in the context of multiple sclerosis (MS) are emergent. This study explores cognitive function in older adults with MS as a function of frailty status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used baseline data from a feasibility randomized controlled trial of a home-based exercise program for older adults with MS. Frailty was verified using performance scores from the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and cut points available in the literature. Cognitive function was assessed using the Brief International Cognitive Assessments for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Data were analyzed using inferential statistics adopting a significance of <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 26 older adults with MS (≥60 years) were analyzed. The majority of the participants were women, and over 85% of the sample had the relapsing-remitting form of MS. Participants reported a mean of more than 20 years of disease and a moderate level of disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale score = 4). Nearly 58% of the sample was classified as frail based on SPPB scores. Univariate analysis demonstrated that frail older adults performed significantly worse (<i>P</i> < .05) on all 3 BICAMS tests. However, after controlling for age and disability level, only visuospatial memory remained significant between frailty groups (<i>P</i> = .043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest reduced cognitive function in frail older adults with MS compared with their nonfrail counterparts. This highlights the need to develop interventions to improve cognitive function and to reverse frailty for older adults with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"26 Q4","pages":"315-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2023-085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies addressing frailty in the context of multiple sclerosis (MS) are emergent. This study explores cognitive function in older adults with MS as a function of frailty status.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used baseline data from a feasibility randomized controlled trial of a home-based exercise program for older adults with MS. Frailty was verified using performance scores from the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and cut points available in the literature. Cognitive function was assessed using the Brief International Cognitive Assessments for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Data were analyzed using inferential statistics adopting a significance of P < .05.

Results: Data from 26 older adults with MS (≥60 years) were analyzed. The majority of the participants were women, and over 85% of the sample had the relapsing-remitting form of MS. Participants reported a mean of more than 20 years of disease and a moderate level of disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale score = 4). Nearly 58% of the sample was classified as frail based on SPPB scores. Univariate analysis demonstrated that frail older adults performed significantly worse (P < .05) on all 3 BICAMS tests. However, after controlling for age and disability level, only visuospatial memory remained significant between frailty groups (P = .043).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest reduced cognitive function in frail older adults with MS compared with their nonfrail counterparts. This highlights the need to develop interventions to improve cognitive function and to reverse frailty for older adults with MS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症体弱老年人的认知功能:利用二次数据分析的探索性研究。
背景:针对多发性硬化症(MS)虚弱状态的研究正在兴起。本研究探讨了多发性硬化症老年人的认知功能与虚弱状态的关系:这项横断面研究使用的基线数据来自一项针对多发性硬化症老年人的家庭锻炼计划的可行性随机对照试验。虚弱状况通过短期体能测试(SPPB)的成绩分数和文献中提供的切点进行验证。认知功能采用多发性硬化症简易国际认知评估(BICAMS)进行评估。数据采用推断统计法进行分析,显著性为 P <.05:对 26 名多发性硬化症老年人(≥60 岁)的数据进行了分析。大多数参与者为女性,超过 85% 的样本患有复发-缓解型多发性硬化症。参与者的平均病程超过 20 年,残疾程度为中度(扩展残疾状况量表评分 = 4)。根据 SPPB 评分,近 58% 的样本被归类为体弱者。单变量分析表明,体弱老年人在所有 3 项 BICAMS 测试中的表现都明显较差(P < .05)。然而,在控制了年龄和残疾程度后,只有视觉空间记忆在虚弱组之间仍有显著性差异(P = .043):我们的研究结果表明,与非虚弱组相比,患有多发性硬化症的虚弱老年人的认知功能有所下降。结论:我们的研究结果表明,患有多发性硬化症的虚弱老年人的认知功能与非虚弱老年人相比有所下降,这凸显了制定干预措施以改善认知功能并扭转患有多发性硬化症的老年人的虚弱状况的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Impact of Fingolimod Discontinuation Strategy on Recurrence of Disease Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis. Expanding the Connection Between Cognition and Illness Intrusiveness in Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Function in Frail Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study Using Secondary Data Analysis. Exploring the Complexity of Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Reasons for Hospital Admission in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1