Expanding the Connection Between Cognition and Illness Intrusiveness in Multiple Sclerosis.

Q1 Nursing International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2023-099
Aprille Gangi, Sarah A Raskin, Aaron P Turner, Frederick W Foley, Lindsay O Neto, Elizabeth S Gromisch
{"title":"Expanding the Connection Between Cognition and Illness Intrusiveness in Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Aprille Gangi, Sarah A Raskin, Aaron P Turner, Frederick W Foley, Lindsay O Neto, Elizabeth S Gromisch","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2023-099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) disease factors, such as cognitive impairment, can cause disruptions in meaningful activities, also known as illness intrusiveness. Although the association between specific objective measures of cognition and illness intrusiveness has been documented in MS, the contributions of individuals' perceptions of their cognition or whether any psychological factors can buffer the relationship have yet to be explored. This study aimed to (1) simultaneously examine objective processing speed and subjective cognition as disease factors contributing to illness intrusiveness and (2) explore whether resilience moderates the relationship between cognition and illness intrusiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N = 112) were individuals with MS who completed the Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale (IIRS), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ), and MS Resiliency Scale (MSRS) as part of a larger cross-sectional study. A hierarchical linear regression was done, followed by individual moderation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the PDQ (<i>b</i> = .43, <i>P</i> = .001) and SDMT (<i>b</i> = -4.17, <i>P</i> = .003) were independent predictors of the IIRS. There was no evidence of moderation in either model, although the MSRS independently contributed to the IIRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among individuals with MS, objective processing speed and subjective cognition were independently associated with illness intrusiveness, highlighting the importance of considering both cognitive performance and perceptions as contributing factors to life disruptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"26 Q4","pages":"321-328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2023-099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) disease factors, such as cognitive impairment, can cause disruptions in meaningful activities, also known as illness intrusiveness. Although the association between specific objective measures of cognition and illness intrusiveness has been documented in MS, the contributions of individuals' perceptions of their cognition or whether any psychological factors can buffer the relationship have yet to be explored. This study aimed to (1) simultaneously examine objective processing speed and subjective cognition as disease factors contributing to illness intrusiveness and (2) explore whether resilience moderates the relationship between cognition and illness intrusiveness.

Methods: Participants (N = 112) were individuals with MS who completed the Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale (IIRS), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ), and MS Resiliency Scale (MSRS) as part of a larger cross-sectional study. A hierarchical linear regression was done, followed by individual moderation analyses.

Results: Both the PDQ (b = .43, P = .001) and SDMT (b = -4.17, P = .003) were independent predictors of the IIRS. There was no evidence of moderation in either model, although the MSRS independently contributed to the IIRS.

Conclusions: Among individuals with MS, objective processing speed and subjective cognition were independently associated with illness intrusiveness, highlighting the importance of considering both cognitive performance and perceptions as contributing factors to life disruptions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拓展多发性硬化症患者认知与疾病侵扰性之间的联系。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)的疾病因素,如认知障碍,可导致有意义的活动中断,也称为疾病侵扰性。虽然多发性硬化症患者认知能力的具体客观指标与疾病侵扰性之间的关系已被记录在案,但个人对其认知能力的贡献或是否有任何心理因素可以缓冲这种关系仍有待探讨。本研究旨在:(1)同时研究客观处理速度和主观认知作为导致疾病侵扰性的疾病因素;(2)探讨复原力是否会调节认知与疾病侵扰性之间的关系:参与者(N = 112)均为多发性硬化症患者,他们完成了疾病侵扰性评定量表(IIRS)、符号数字模型测试(SDMT)、感知缺陷问卷(PDQ)和多发性硬化症恢复力量表(MSRS),这是一项大型横断面研究的一部分。研究人员进行了分层线性回归,然后进行了单项调节分析:结果:PDQ(b = .43,P = .001)和 SDMT(b = -4.17,P = .003)都是 IIRS 的独立预测因子。尽管 MSRS 对 IIRS 有独立的预测作用,但两个模型都没有调节作用:结论:在多发性硬化症患者中,客观处理速度和主观认知与疾病侵扰性独立相关,突出了将认知表现和感知作为生活干扰因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Impact of Fingolimod Discontinuation Strategy on Recurrence of Disease Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis. Expanding the Connection Between Cognition and Illness Intrusiveness in Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Function in Frail Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study Using Secondary Data Analysis. Exploring the Complexity of Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Reasons for Hospital Admission in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1