HPV E6/E7 mRNA screening alone can be used as a screening method for cervical cancer in premenopausal women in China: A retrospective study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.16043
Ying Liu, Shirong Yang, Yingying Ma, Yingying Gong, Beibei Du, Yunfei Wang, Linqing Yang
{"title":"HPV E6/E7 mRNA screening alone can be used as a screening method for cervical cancer in premenopausal women in China: A retrospective study.","authors":"Ying Liu, Shirong Yang, Yingying Ma, Yingying Gong, Beibei Du, Yunfei Wang, Linqing Yang","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the value of a HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay (Aptima® HPV [AHPV]) for primary cervical cancer screening combined with menopausal status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 16 917 women underwent AHPV testing and had complete histopathological results at the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University China between January 1, 2017 and March 31, 2022. We evaluated the performance of different screening strategies and combined strategies, as well as evaluations of different menopausal states.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When identifying LSIL+ (includes low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical cancer [ICC]), the sensitivity (91.2%) and negative predictive value (NPV; 96.6%) were significantly higher for AHPV than for liquid-based cytology assay (LBC; 33.2% and 84.7% for sensitivity and NPV, respectively). Furthermore, the co-testing strategy (cytology combined with AHPV), when compared with AHPV, achieved a slightly higher sensitivity (93.6% vs. 91.2%, respectively, P < 0.001), a similar specificity (61.3% vs. 62.7%, respectively, P = 0.014), a similar positive predictive value (PPV; 37.5% vs. 37.8%, respectively, P = 0.709) and a similar NPV (97.5% vs. 96.6%, respectively, P = 0.001). Moreover, AHPV (when compared with menopausal women) achieved a higher sensitivity (93.5% vs. 77.7%, respectively, P < 0.001), a higher NPV (97.3% vs. 93.9%, respectively, P < 0.001), a similar PPV (37.8% vs. 37.0%, respectively, P = 0.618) and a slightly lower specificity (60.7% vs. 72.1%, respectively, P < 0.001) in premenopausal women. These results were similar when identifying HSIL+ (includes high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and ICC).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study suggests that initial screening with HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing rather than combined screening is a suitable candidate for cervical cancer screening in China (especially for premenopausal women) based on economic reasons.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the value of a HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay (Aptima® HPV [AHPV]) for primary cervical cancer screening combined with menopausal status.

Methods: A total of 16 917 women underwent AHPV testing and had complete histopathological results at the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University China between January 1, 2017 and March 31, 2022. We evaluated the performance of different screening strategies and combined strategies, as well as evaluations of different menopausal states.

Results: When identifying LSIL+ (includes low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical cancer [ICC]), the sensitivity (91.2%) and negative predictive value (NPV; 96.6%) were significantly higher for AHPV than for liquid-based cytology assay (LBC; 33.2% and 84.7% for sensitivity and NPV, respectively). Furthermore, the co-testing strategy (cytology combined with AHPV), when compared with AHPV, achieved a slightly higher sensitivity (93.6% vs. 91.2%, respectively, P < 0.001), a similar specificity (61.3% vs. 62.7%, respectively, P = 0.014), a similar positive predictive value (PPV; 37.5% vs. 37.8%, respectively, P = 0.709) and a similar NPV (97.5% vs. 96.6%, respectively, P = 0.001). Moreover, AHPV (when compared with menopausal women) achieved a higher sensitivity (93.5% vs. 77.7%, respectively, P < 0.001), a higher NPV (97.3% vs. 93.9%, respectively, P < 0.001), a similar PPV (37.8% vs. 37.0%, respectively, P = 0.618) and a slightly lower specificity (60.7% vs. 72.1%, respectively, P < 0.001) in premenopausal women. These results were similar when identifying HSIL+ (includes high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and ICC).

Conclusion: The present study suggests that initial screening with HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing rather than combined screening is a suitable candidate for cervical cancer screening in China (especially for premenopausal women) based on economic reasons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单独进行 HPV E6/E7 mRNA 筛查可作为中国绝经前妇女宫颈癌的筛查方法:一项回顾性研究。
背景:本研究旨在评估HPV E6/E7 mRNA检测(Aptima® HPV [AHPV])与绝经状态相结合在宫颈癌初筛中的价值:2017年1月1日至2022年3月31日期间,中国济宁医科大学附属医院共有16 917名女性接受了AHPV检测,并获得了完整的组织病理学结果。我们评估了不同筛查策略和联合策略的效果,以及对不同绝经状态的评估:结果:在确定LSIL+(包括低度和高度鳞状上皮内病变和浸润性宫颈癌[ICC])时,AHPV的灵敏度(91.2%)和阴性预测值(96.6%)明显高于液基细胞学检测(LBC,灵敏度和阴性预测值分别为33.2%和84.7%)。此外,与 AHPV 相比,联合检测策略(细胞学与 AHPV 联合检测)的灵敏度略高(分别为 93.6% 对 91.2%,P 结论:本研究表明,基于经济原因,HPV E6/E7 mRNA 检测初筛比联合筛查更适合中国的宫颈癌筛查(尤其是绝经前妇女)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Prevention of maternal mortality with interventions in primary care services: What can we do? Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy occurrence: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology devices designed for low- and middle-income countries: A narrative review. The impact of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries on the interpregnancy interval and pregnancy complications of subsequent delivery: A retrospective study. HPV E6/E7 mRNA screening alone can be used as a screening method for cervical cancer in premenopausal women in China: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1