Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693
Daniel S Reuland, Meghan C O'Leary, Seth D Crockett, Deeonna E Farr, Renée M Ferrari, Teri L Malo, Alexis A Moore, Connor M Randolph, Shana Ratner, Lindsay R Stradtman, Christina Stylianou, Kevin Su, Xianming Tan, Van Tang, Stephanie B Wheeler, Alison T Brenner
{"title":"Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Daniel S Reuland, Meghan C O'Leary, Seth D Crockett, Deeonna E Farr, Renée M Ferrari, Teri L Malo, Alexis A Moore, Connor M Randolph, Shana Ratner, Lindsay R Stradtman, Christina Stylianou, Kevin Su, Xianming Tan, Van Tang, Stephanie B Wheeler, Alison T Brenner","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective but remains underused in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of a centralized CRC screening outreach intervention involving mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach and patient navigation to colonoscopy after abnormal results of FIT.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted, using intention-to-treat analysis. Participants were enrolled from July 6, 2020, to September 17, 2021, and analyses were performed from July 6, 2023, to January 31, 2024. The study was conducted at independent FQHCs comprising 12 clinical delivery sites in North Carolina. The outreach intervention was centralized at an academic cancer center. Active individuals aged 50 to 75 years at average risk for CRC and not current with screening per US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations were included.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In addition to usual care, intervention participants received mailed screening outreach materials including an introductory letter, FIT kit packet with instructions and return postage, and 2 reminder letters if needed. Intervention participants with positive results of mailed FIT were offered navigation to facilitate follow-up colonoscopy completion. Control participants received usual care alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was completion of a US Preventive Services Task Force-recommended CRC screening test within 6 months determined by electronic health record review. Secondary outcomes were colonoscopy completion within 6 months after positive FIT results and detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia, defined as advanced adenoma or CRC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4002 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [6.8] years; 2256 [56.4%] female; 364 (9.1%) Hispanic; 1082 [27.0%] non-Hispanic Black; 2288 [57.2%] non-Hispanic White; 1198 [29.9%] commercially insured; 617 [15.4%] Medicaid; 1227 [30.7%] Medicare; and 960 [24.0%] uninsured), with 2001 randomized to each group. Compared with controls, intervention participants were more likely to complete screening within 6 months of randomization (30.0% vs 9.7%; difference, 20.29 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.85-22.73 percentage points). The intervention was effective in all insurance types. In the intervention arm, 33 of 48 participants with positive FIT results (68.8%) completed follow-up colonoscopy within 6 months compared with 8 of 18 participants (44.4%) in the control arm (difference, 24.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.13 to 50.74 percentage points). Advanced colorectal neoplasia was detected in 29 intervention participants (1.4%) and 15 control participants (0.7%) (difference, 0.68 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.05-1.35 percentage points).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial of centralized screening outreach intervention in diverse patients served by independent FQHCs, CRC screening completion and advanced colorectal neoplasia detection were substantially increased. Future studies should examine the cost and scalability of this intervention in this context.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04406714.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2446693"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective but remains underused in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a centralized CRC screening outreach intervention involving mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach and patient navigation to colonoscopy after abnormal results of FIT.

Design, setting, and participants: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted, using intention-to-treat analysis. Participants were enrolled from July 6, 2020, to September 17, 2021, and analyses were performed from July 6, 2023, to January 31, 2024. The study was conducted at independent FQHCs comprising 12 clinical delivery sites in North Carolina. The outreach intervention was centralized at an academic cancer center. Active individuals aged 50 to 75 years at average risk for CRC and not current with screening per US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations were included.

Intervention: In addition to usual care, intervention participants received mailed screening outreach materials including an introductory letter, FIT kit packet with instructions and return postage, and 2 reminder letters if needed. Intervention participants with positive results of mailed FIT were offered navigation to facilitate follow-up colonoscopy completion. Control participants received usual care alone.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was completion of a US Preventive Services Task Force-recommended CRC screening test within 6 months determined by electronic health record review. Secondary outcomes were colonoscopy completion within 6 months after positive FIT results and detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia, defined as advanced adenoma or CRC.

Results: A total of 4002 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [6.8] years; 2256 [56.4%] female; 364 (9.1%) Hispanic; 1082 [27.0%] non-Hispanic Black; 2288 [57.2%] non-Hispanic White; 1198 [29.9%] commercially insured; 617 [15.4%] Medicaid; 1227 [30.7%] Medicare; and 960 [24.0%] uninsured), with 2001 randomized to each group. Compared with controls, intervention participants were more likely to complete screening within 6 months of randomization (30.0% vs 9.7%; difference, 20.29 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.85-22.73 percentage points). The intervention was effective in all insurance types. In the intervention arm, 33 of 48 participants with positive FIT results (68.8%) completed follow-up colonoscopy within 6 months compared with 8 of 18 participants (44.4%) in the control arm (difference, 24.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.13 to 50.74 percentage points). Advanced colorectal neoplasia was detected in 29 intervention participants (1.4%) and 15 control participants (0.7%) (difference, 0.68 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.05-1.35 percentage points).

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of centralized screening outreach intervention in diverse patients served by independent FQHCs, CRC screening completion and advanced colorectal neoplasia detection were substantially increased. Future studies should examine the cost and scalability of this intervention in this context.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04406714.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联邦合格医疗中心的大肠癌集中筛查推广:随机临床试验。
重要性:大肠癌(CRC)筛查很有效,但在联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)中仍未得到充分利用:目的:评估一项集中式 CRC 筛查推广干预措施的有效性,该干预措施包括邮寄粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)推广以及在 FIT 结果异常后引导患者进行结肠镜检查:采用意向治疗分析法进行了一项实用随机临床试验。参与者登记时间为 2020 年 7 月 6 日至 2021 年 9 月 17 日,分析时间为 2023 年 7 月 6 日至 2024 年 1 月 31 日。研究在北卡罗来纳州由 12 个临床服务点组成的独立 FQHC 进行。外展干预集中在一家学术癌症中心。研究对象包括年龄在 50 岁至 75 岁之间、具有患 CRC 平均风险且未按美国预防服务工作组建议进行筛查的活跃人群:除常规护理外,干预参与者还收到了邮寄的筛查宣传材料,包括一封介绍信、附有说明和回邮地址的 FIT 工具包,以及两封必要的提醒信。对邮寄的 FIT 结果呈阳性的干预参与者提供导航服务,以方便其完成后续结肠镜检查。对照组参与者只接受常规护理:主要结果是在 6 个月内完成了美国预防服务工作组推荐的 CRC 筛查检查(通过电子健康记录审查确定)。次要结果是在 FIT 结果呈阳性后 6 个月内完成结肠镜检查,以及发现晚期结直肠肿瘤(定义为晚期腺瘤或 CRC):共纳入 4002 名参与者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 59.6 [6.8] 岁;2256 [56.4%] 名女性;364 (9.1%) 名西班牙裔;1082 [27.0%] 名非西班牙裔黑人;2288 [57.2%] 名非西班牙裔白人;1198 [29.9%] 名有商业保险;617 [15.4%] 名有医疗补助;1227 [30.7%] 名有医疗保险;960 [24.0%] 名无保险),每组随机分为 2001 人。与对照组相比,干预参与者更有可能在随机分组后 6 个月内完成筛查(30.0% vs 9.7%;差异为 20.29 个百分点;95% CI 为 17.85-22.73 个百分点)。干预措施对所有保险类型都有效。在干预组中,48 名 FIT 结果呈阳性的参与者中有 33 人(68.8%)在 6 个月内完成了后续结肠镜检查,而在对照组中,18 名参与者中有 8 人(44.4%)完成了后续结肠镜检查(差异为 24.3 个百分点;95% CI 为-2.13 至 50.74 个百分点)。29 名干预组参与者(1.4%)和 15 名对照组参与者(0.7%)发现了晚期结直肠肿瘤(差异为 0.68 个百分点;95% CI 为 0.05-1.35 个百分点):在这项针对独立 FQHC 服务的不同患者的集中筛查推广干预随机临床试验中,CRC 筛查完成率和晚期结直肠肿瘤检出率均大幅提高。未来的研究应考察这种干预措施在这种情况下的成本和可扩展性:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04406714。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Network Open. Meal Timing Interventions for Weight Loss and Metabolic Health-What Does the Evidence Tell Us So Far? Saving Children's Lives Through Universal Pediatric Readiness Is a Wise Investment. Anemia Acuity Effect on Transfusion Strategies in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the MINT Trial. Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1