Null method to estimate the maximal PA at subsaturating concentrations of agonist.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY Journal of General Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1085/jgp.202413644
Allison L Germann, Spencer R Pierce, Joe Henry Steinbach, Gustav Akk
{"title":"Null method to estimate the maximal PA at subsaturating concentrations of agonist.","authors":"Allison L Germann, Spencer R Pierce, Joe Henry Steinbach, Gustav Akk","doi":"10.1085/jgp.202413644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The maximal probability of being in an active state (PA,max) is a measure of gating efficacy for a given agonist acting on a given receptor channel. In macroscopic electrophysiological recordings, PA,max is typically estimated by comparing the amplitude of the current response to a saturating concentration of a test agonist to that of a reference agonist with known PA. Here, we describe an approach to estimate the PA,max for low-efficacy agonists at subsaturating concentrations. In this approach, the amplitude of the response to a high-efficacy control agonist applied alone is compared with the amplitude of the response to a control agonist coapplied with the low-efficacy test agonist that binds to the same site(s). If the response to the combination is larger than the response to the control agonist alone, then the PA,max of the test agonist is greater than the PA of the control response. Conversely, if the response to the control agonist is reduced upon exposure to the test agonist, then the PA,max of the test agonist is smaller than the PA of the control response. The exact PA,max of the test agonist can be determined by testing its effect at different concentrations of the control agonist to estimate the PA at which the effect changes direction. The main advantage of this approach lies in the ability to use low, subsaturating concentrations of the test agonist. The model-based predictions are supported by observations from activation of heteromeric and homomeric GABAA receptors by combinations of high- and low-efficacy orthosteric agonists.</p>","PeriodicalId":54828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Physiology","volume":"157 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202413644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The maximal probability of being in an active state (PA,max) is a measure of gating efficacy for a given agonist acting on a given receptor channel. In macroscopic electrophysiological recordings, PA,max is typically estimated by comparing the amplitude of the current response to a saturating concentration of a test agonist to that of a reference agonist with known PA. Here, we describe an approach to estimate the PA,max for low-efficacy agonists at subsaturating concentrations. In this approach, the amplitude of the response to a high-efficacy control agonist applied alone is compared with the amplitude of the response to a control agonist coapplied with the low-efficacy test agonist that binds to the same site(s). If the response to the combination is larger than the response to the control agonist alone, then the PA,max of the test agonist is greater than the PA of the control response. Conversely, if the response to the control agonist is reduced upon exposure to the test agonist, then the PA,max of the test agonist is smaller than the PA of the control response. The exact PA,max of the test agonist can be determined by testing its effect at different concentrations of the control agonist to estimate the PA at which the effect changes direction. The main advantage of this approach lies in the ability to use low, subsaturating concentrations of the test agonist. The model-based predictions are supported by observations from activation of heteromeric and homomeric GABAA receptors by combinations of high- and low-efficacy orthosteric agonists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无效法估算激动剂亚饱和浓度下的最大 PA 值。
处于活跃状态的最大概率(PA,max)是衡量作用于特定受体通道的特定激动剂的门控效能的指标。在宏观电生理记录中,PA,max 通常是通过比较测试激动剂饱和浓度与已知 PA 的参考激动剂的电流响应振幅来估算的。在此,我们介绍一种估算亚饱和浓度下低效激动剂 PA,max 的方法。在这种方法中,对单独使用的高效力对照激动剂的反应幅度与对与相同位点结合的低效力测试激动剂联合使用的对照激动剂的反应幅度进行比较。如果对组合的反应大于对单独对照激动剂的反应,则测试激动剂的 PA,max 大于对照反应的 PA。反之,如果暴露于测试激动剂后对对照激动剂的反应减弱,则测试激动剂的 PA,max 小于对照反应的 PA。测试激动剂的确切 PA,max 可以通过测试其在不同浓度的对照激动剂下的效应来确定,以估计效应改变方向的 PA。这种方法的主要优点在于能够使用低浓度、亚饱和度的测试激动剂。基于模型的预测得到了高效力和低效力正交激动剂组合激活异构体和同构体 GABAA 受体的观察结果的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: General physiology is the study of biological mechanisms through analytical investigations, which decipher the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying biological function at all levels of organization. The mission of Journal of General Physiology (JGP) is to publish mechanistic and quantitative molecular and cellular physiology of the highest quality, to provide a best-in-class author experience, and to nurture future generations of independent researchers. The major emphasis is on physiological problems at the cellular and molecular level.
期刊最新文献
Regulation of NMDAR activation efficiency by environmental factors and subunit composition. Null method to estimate the maximal PA at subsaturating concentrations of agonist. A sodium channel mutant removes fast inactivation with the inactivation particle bound. Functional role of myosin-binding protein H in thick filaments of developing vertebrate fast-twitch skeletal muscle. Mechanism of acid-sensing ion channel modulation by Hi1a.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1