Low Prevalence of Anaerobic Bacteria in Pediatric Septic Arthritis Makes Obtaining Anaerobic Cultures of Questionable Value.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002868
Maia D Regan, David A Spiegel, Kenneth Smith, Christine M Goodbody, Keith D Baldwin
{"title":"Low Prevalence of Anaerobic Bacteria in Pediatric Septic Arthritis Makes Obtaining Anaerobic Cultures of Questionable Value.","authors":"Maia D Regan, David A Spiegel, Kenneth Smith, Christine M Goodbody, Keith D Baldwin","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric acute septic arthritis necessitates urgent identification and treatment to avoid irreversible joint damage if not recognized and treated in a timely manner. Many centers routinely obtain both aerobic and anaerobic cultures for the purpose of pathogen identification; however, the yield of anaerobic culture results has been called into question. The goal of this study was to determine the positivity rate of anaerobic cultures collected intraoperatively in pediatric patients with clinically diagnosed septic arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a clinical diagnosis of septic arthritis were extracted from a search of musculoskeletal infections at a large tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2007 to 2021. Cultures obtained from the operating room or through arthrocentesis were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 470 cases of pediatric septic arthritis of which only 3 cultures were positive (0.6%) for anaerobic organisms. All cases involved a single isolate. The anaerobic bacteria that were detected included 1 facultative anaerobe, 1 strict anaerobe, and 1 relatively aerotolerant anaerobe. Four aerobic organisms grew on the anaerobic cultures. Three of the false positives also grew on aerobic culture media, whereas 1 aerobic specimen grew explicitly on anaerobic media. Neither the facultative anaerobe nor the aerotolerant anaerobe grew on aerobic culture media.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over a 14-year period, only 0.6% (3 cases) of septic arthritis cases yielded positive anaerobic cultures that were not able to be cultured on aerobic media. As such, an anaerobic culture was more likely to culture a bacterium that would have also been cultured on aerobic media. In addition, a true positive anaerobic culture that would not have been diagnosed on aerobic cultures only occurs about once every 5 years at our institution. If one were to decide against obtaining anaerobic cultures, they would only miss 3 infections out of almost 500 (0.6%), and antibiotics would only have changed 0.6% of the time. These results suggest that routinely obtaining anaerobic cultures may be of limited value in pediatric septic arthritis. The false-positive rate of anaerobic labs exceeds that of true-positive cases. These results provide actionable opportunity to help guide clinician decision-making in a more cost-effective and efficient management of pediatric septic arthritis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric acute septic arthritis necessitates urgent identification and treatment to avoid irreversible joint damage if not recognized and treated in a timely manner. Many centers routinely obtain both aerobic and anaerobic cultures for the purpose of pathogen identification; however, the yield of anaerobic culture results has been called into question. The goal of this study was to determine the positivity rate of anaerobic cultures collected intraoperatively in pediatric patients with clinically diagnosed septic arthritis.

Methods: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of septic arthritis were extracted from a search of musculoskeletal infections at a large tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2007 to 2021. Cultures obtained from the operating room or through arthrocentesis were examined.

Results: We identified 470 cases of pediatric septic arthritis of which only 3 cultures were positive (0.6%) for anaerobic organisms. All cases involved a single isolate. The anaerobic bacteria that were detected included 1 facultative anaerobe, 1 strict anaerobe, and 1 relatively aerotolerant anaerobe. Four aerobic organisms grew on the anaerobic cultures. Three of the false positives also grew on aerobic culture media, whereas 1 aerobic specimen grew explicitly on anaerobic media. Neither the facultative anaerobe nor the aerotolerant anaerobe grew on aerobic culture media.

Conclusions: Over a 14-year period, only 0.6% (3 cases) of septic arthritis cases yielded positive anaerobic cultures that were not able to be cultured on aerobic media. As such, an anaerobic culture was more likely to culture a bacterium that would have also been cultured on aerobic media. In addition, a true positive anaerobic culture that would not have been diagnosed on aerobic cultures only occurs about once every 5 years at our institution. If one were to decide against obtaining anaerobic cultures, they would only miss 3 infections out of almost 500 (0.6%), and antibiotics would only have changed 0.6% of the time. These results suggest that routinely obtaining anaerobic cultures may be of limited value in pediatric septic arthritis. The false-positive rate of anaerobic labs exceeds that of true-positive cases. These results provide actionable opportunity to help guide clinician decision-making in a more cost-effective and efficient management of pediatric septic arthritis.

Level of evidence: IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厌氧菌在小儿化脓性关节炎中的低流行率使厌氧菌培养的价值受到质疑。
背景:小儿急性化脓性关节炎需要紧急鉴定和治疗,以避免因未及时发现和治疗而造成不可逆转的关节损伤。许多中心都会常规进行需氧和厌氧培养以鉴定病原体;然而,厌氧培养结果的阳性率一直受到质疑。本研究旨在确定临床诊断为脓毒性关节炎的儿科患者术中采集的厌氧菌培养的阳性率:方法:临床诊断为化脓性关节炎的患者来自一家大型三级儿科医院2007年至2021年的肌肉骨骼感染检索。对从手术室或关节穿刺术中获得的培养物进行了检查:结果:我们发现了470例小儿化脓性关节炎病例,其中只有3例厌氧菌培养呈阳性(0.6%)。所有病例均为单一分离菌。检测到的厌氧菌包括1个兼性厌氧菌、1个严格厌氧菌和1个相对耐气厌氧菌。厌氧培养物中生长出 4 种需氧菌。其中 3 个假阳性也在需氧培养基上生长,而 1 个需氧标本在厌氧培养基上明确生长。兼性厌氧菌和耐气厌氧菌均未在需氧培养基上生长:在14年的时间里,只有0.6%的脓毒性关节炎病例(3例)在需氧培养基上无法培养出阳性厌氧菌。因此,厌氧培养更有可能培养出在需氧培养基上也能培养出的细菌。此外,在我院,大约每 5 年才会出现一次在需氧培养基上无法确诊的厌氧培养真正阳性结果。如果决定不进行厌氧培养,那么在近 500 例感染中只会漏掉 3 例(0.6%),而更换抗生素的比例仅为 0.6%。这些结果表明,常规进行厌氧菌培养对小儿化脓性关节炎的治疗价值有限。厌氧菌实验室的假阳性率超过了真阳性病例的假阳性率。这些结果提供了可操作的机会,有助于指导临床医生做出更具成本效益和效率的小儿化脓性关节炎管理决策:证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
期刊最新文献
Low Prevalence of Anaerobic Bacteria in Pediatric Septic Arthritis Makes Obtaining Anaerobic Cultures of Questionable Value. Incidence and Long-term Follow-up of Pediatric Lateral Condyle Fractures: A Population-based Study. Identifying Risk Factors for Open Reduction in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures. The Change of Asymptomatic Atlantoaxial Instability With Down Syndrome From Infant to Adolescent in Japanese Population: Minimum 10 Years Follow-Up. Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons Manage Pediatric Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures Differently Than Nonpediatric Orthopaedic Specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1