Impact of Clazosentan on Vasospasm Reduction and Functional Recovery after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0204
Sosho Kajiwara, Takayuki Kawano, Yu Hasegawa, Yukihiko Nakamura, Kiyohiko Sakata, Jin Kikuchi, Masaru Hirohata, Motohiro Morioka
{"title":"Impact of Clazosentan on Vasospasm Reduction and Functional Recovery after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.","authors":"Sosho Kajiwara, Takayuki Kawano, Yu Hasegawa, Yukihiko Nakamura, Kiyohiko Sakata, Jin Kikuchi, Masaru Hirohata, Motohiro Morioka","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In every hospital in Japan, until 2022, the primary treatment for preventing delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) involved a combination of ozagrel sodium (Oz), fasudil hydrochloride (Fs), cilostazol, and statins. However, with the approval of clazosentan in January 2022, it has been used as a first-choice drug more frequently. Despite this shift, limited evidence exists regarding the use of clazosentan as the first choice for DCI prevention. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and outcomes of these two treatments in aSAH patients. Patients treated with Oz+Fs were enrolled between January 2014 and March 2022. In April 2022, clazosentan was prescribed to prevent DCI. Clinical data were collected, and propensity-score matching was conducted based on the clazosentan group. The primary endpoint was the functional outcome at discharge and 6-12 months after admission; the secondary endpoints were the incidence of cerebral vasospasm (CV) and DCI. In this study, 221 patients were included, and 27 were selected from both groups after matching. The incidence of CV was significantly lower in the clazosentan group (11.1% vs. 55.6%, p<0.01), and the incidence of DCI tended to be lower in the clazosentan group (3.7% vs. 25.9%, p=0.05). No significant difference was observed in the primary endpoint of functional outcome at discharge; however, a significant improvement in functional outcome was observed in the clazosentan group at 6 months (96.3% vs. 70.4%, p<0.05). Clazosentan significantly reduced the incidence of CV and improved functional outcomes in patients with aSAH compared to Oz+Fs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In every hospital in Japan, until 2022, the primary treatment for preventing delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) involved a combination of ozagrel sodium (Oz), fasudil hydrochloride (Fs), cilostazol, and statins. However, with the approval of clazosentan in January 2022, it has been used as a first-choice drug more frequently. Despite this shift, limited evidence exists regarding the use of clazosentan as the first choice for DCI prevention. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and outcomes of these two treatments in aSAH patients. Patients treated with Oz+Fs were enrolled between January 2014 and March 2022. In April 2022, clazosentan was prescribed to prevent DCI. Clinical data were collected, and propensity-score matching was conducted based on the clazosentan group. The primary endpoint was the functional outcome at discharge and 6-12 months after admission; the secondary endpoints were the incidence of cerebral vasospasm (CV) and DCI. In this study, 221 patients were included, and 27 were selected from both groups after matching. The incidence of CV was significantly lower in the clazosentan group (11.1% vs. 55.6%, p<0.01), and the incidence of DCI tended to be lower in the clazosentan group (3.7% vs. 25.9%, p=0.05). No significant difference was observed in the primary endpoint of functional outcome at discharge; however, a significant improvement in functional outcome was observed in the clazosentan group at 6 months (96.3% vs. 70.4%, p<0.05). Clazosentan significantly reduced the incidence of CV and improved functional outcomes in patients with aSAH compared to Oz+Fs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克拉唑生坦对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后血管痉挛缓解和功能恢复的影响
在 2022 年之前,日本每家医院预防动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后延迟性脑缺血(DCI)的主要治疗方法是奥扎格雷钠(Oz)、盐酸法舒地尔(Fs)、西洛他唑和他汀类药物的组合。然而,随着克拉索坦于 2022 年 1 月获得批准,它已被更多地用作首选药物。尽管出现了这种转变,但将克拉索坦作为预防 DCI 首选药物的证据仍然有限。在这项研究中,我们分析了这两种治疗方法对 aSAH 患者的疗效和结局。2014年1月至2022年3月期间,接受Oz+Fs治疗的患者入组。2022 年 4 月,患者开始使用克拉索坦来预防 DCI。收集了临床数据,并根据克拉索坦组进行了倾向分数匹配。主要终点是出院时和入院后6-12个月的功能预后;次要终点是脑血管痉挛(CV)和DCI的发生率。这项研究共纳入了 221 名患者,经过配对后从两组患者中各选出了 27 人。克拉索坦组的 CV 发生率明显较低(11.1% 对 55.6%,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting for Carotid Artery Stenosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients. Impact of Clazosentan on Vasospasm Reduction and Functional Recovery after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Safety and Selection Criteria of Single-joint Hybrid Assistive Limb for Upper Limb Paralysis After Stroke: A Phase I Trial. Stepwise Improvement of Cerebral Hemodynamics in Staged Angioplasty for Carotid Artery Stenosis. Validity of E-PASS Score for Evaluating Perioperative Minor Complications Associated with Carotid Endarterectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1