Comparison of the real-world safety of two different long-acting methylphenidate formulations (Medikinet® MR and Concerta®) - a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study.
Jakob Ørnberg, Anke Mayer, Oliver Dangel, Richard Ammer
{"title":"Comparison of the real-world safety of two different long-acting methylphenidate formulations (Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup>) - a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study.","authors":"Jakob Ørnberg, Anke Mayer, Oliver Dangel, Richard Ammer","doi":"10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup> are long-acting methylphenidate formulations used for the treatment of pediatric and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The two formulations have shown comparable safety profiles in two head-to-head randomized controlled trials. However, real-world studies comparing the safety profiles of these products are not available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the real-world safety of Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup> using register data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This population-based cohort study was conducted based on data from Danish registries. The study included patients with continuous long-term (i.e., ≥12 months) exposure to either Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR or Concerta<sup>®</sup> between 1995 and 2018. Outcomes included several selected adverse events of interest. A sensitivity analysis was performed, excluding patients exposed to Concerta<sup>®</sup> generics. For each outcome, Fisher's exact test was performed to compare the number of cases between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using logistic regression models with patients exposed to Concerta<sup>®</sup> as the reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 1249 patients exposed to Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and 2455 patients exposed to Concerta®. No cases of cerebral arteritis or priapism were identified in either cohort. ORs for sudden death and anorexia could not be calculated due to the absence of cases in the Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR cohort. For the remaining outcomes, no statistically significant difference in risk was found between Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR-exposed and Concerta<sup>®</sup>-exposed patients. The sensitivity analysis produced results consistent with those obtained in the main analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this population-based cohort study indicate that Medikinet<sup>®</sup> MR and Concerta<sup>®</sup> have comparable real-world safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"84-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Medikinet® MR and Concerta® are long-acting methylphenidate formulations used for the treatment of pediatric and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The two formulations have shown comparable safety profiles in two head-to-head randomized controlled trials. However, real-world studies comparing the safety profiles of these products are not available.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the real-world safety of Medikinet® MR and Concerta® using register data.
Method: This population-based cohort study was conducted based on data from Danish registries. The study included patients with continuous long-term (i.e., ≥12 months) exposure to either Medikinet® MR or Concerta® between 1995 and 2018. Outcomes included several selected adverse events of interest. A sensitivity analysis was performed, excluding patients exposed to Concerta® generics. For each outcome, Fisher's exact test was performed to compare the number of cases between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using logistic regression models with patients exposed to Concerta® as the reference group.
Results: The study population included 1249 patients exposed to Medikinet® MR and 2455 patients exposed to Concerta®. No cases of cerebral arteritis or priapism were identified in either cohort. ORs for sudden death and anorexia could not be calculated due to the absence of cases in the Medikinet® MR cohort. For the remaining outcomes, no statistically significant difference in risk was found between Medikinet® MR-exposed and Concerta®-exposed patients. The sensitivity analysis produced results consistent with those obtained in the main analysis.
Conclusions: The results of this population-based cohort study indicate that Medikinet® MR and Concerta® have comparable real-world safety profiles.