Evaluation of Postanesthesia Handoff Checklist on Patient Outcomes in an Adult Postanesthesia Care Unit.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.008
Reed Stephen Halterman, Brittany Darnell, Chima Anukam, Elizabeth Wilkes, Shannon Broxton
{"title":"Evaluation of Postanesthesia Handoff Checklist on Patient Outcomes in an Adult Postanesthesia Care Unit.","authors":"Reed Stephen Halterman, Brittany Darnell, Chima Anukam, Elizabeth Wilkes, Shannon Broxton","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of handoff communication tools, such as checklists, has been shown to improve communication and decrease the omission of critical patient care information. However, the effect these tools have on patient outcomes has not been investigated. After successfully implementing a handoff checklist in an adult postanesthesia care unit, patient outcomes were retrospectively measured before and after the implementation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven hundred and ninety-one prechecklist patients in September 2017 were compared to 828 postchecklist patients in September 2018. Pain scores, oxygen saturation, and end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> readings were collected for postanesthesia care unit patients in both groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Postchecklist patients exhibited less severe pain (30.8% vs 42.4%) and fewer desaturation episodes (36.4% vs 44.8%). Time to rescue for both did not show a significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective comparison showed an improvement in measurable patient outcomes in the immediate postoperative period after the implementation of a handoff communication tool. More research is needed to determine the direct correlation between handoff tool use and measurable patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The use of handoff communication tools, such as checklists, has been shown to improve communication and decrease the omission of critical patient care information. However, the effect these tools have on patient outcomes has not been investigated. After successfully implementing a handoff checklist in an adult postanesthesia care unit, patient outcomes were retrospectively measured before and after the implementation.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Methods: Seven hundred and ninety-one prechecklist patients in September 2017 were compared to 828 postchecklist patients in September 2018. Pain scores, oxygen saturation, and end-tidal CO2 readings were collected for postanesthesia care unit patients in both groups.

Findings: Postchecklist patients exhibited less severe pain (30.8% vs 42.4%) and fewer desaturation episodes (36.4% vs 44.8%). Time to rescue for both did not show a significant difference.

Conclusions: This retrospective comparison showed an improvement in measurable patient outcomes in the immediate postoperative period after the implementation of a handoff communication tool. More research is needed to determine the direct correlation between handoff tool use and measurable patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估麻醉后交接清单对成人麻醉后护理病房患者疗效的影响。
目的:事实证明,使用交接沟通工具(如核对表)可以改善沟通,减少遗漏重要的患者护理信息。然而,这些工具对患者治疗效果的影响尚未得到研究。在成人麻醉后护理病房成功实施交接清单后,对实施前后的患者预后进行了回顾性测量:设计:回顾性病历审查:将 2017 年 9 月实施清单前的 791 名患者与 2018 年 9 月实施清单后的 828 名患者进行比较。收集了两组麻醉后护理病房患者的疼痛评分、血氧饱和度和潮气末二氧化碳读数:核对清单后的患者表现出较轻的疼痛(30.8% vs 42.4%)和较少的不饱和发作(36.4% vs 44.8%)。两者的抢救时间没有明显差异:这项回顾性比较显示,在实施交接沟通工具后,术后初期患者的可测量结果有所改善。需要进行更多研究,以确定交接工具的使用与可测量的患者预后之间的直接相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Postanesthesia Handoff Checklist on Patient Outcomes in an Adult Postanesthesia Care Unit. Determination of Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue Among Surgical Nurses. Nebulized Dexmedetomidine for Sedation and Mask Acceptance in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Effects of Auricular Acupressure on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Noise in the Postanesthesia Care Unit: Identifying Potential Causes for Increased Noise Levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1