First-line treatment with zolbetuximab plus CAPOX for ClDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241297052
Jianying Lei, Jiahao Zhang, Caicong You, Wu Fu, Maobai Liu, Na Li
{"title":"First-line treatment with zolbetuximab plus CAPOX for ClDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.","authors":"Jianying Lei, Jiahao Zhang, Caicong You, Wu Fu, Maobai Liu, Na Li","doi":"10.1177/17562848241297052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or unresectable metastatic gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma have limited first-line treatment options and a poor prognosis. The GLOW clinical trial showed that zolbetuximab plus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) significantly prolonged these patients' overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of zolbetuximab plus CAPOX as a first-line treatment for HER2-negative locally advanced or unresectable metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma in the United States and China.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The cost-effective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the GLOW clinical trial data (NCT03653507), we constructed a 10-year Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the zolbetuximab or placebo plus CAPOX treatment regimen. Only direct medical costs were considered. The primary outcomes of the model were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were employed to assess the robustness of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the United States, zolbetuximab plus CAPOX added 0.24 QALYs and resulted in an incremental cost of $196,791.11 compared with placebo plus CAPOX, which had an ICER of $821,515.65 per QALY gained. For China, the zolbetuximab group gained 0.23 QALYs at an incremental cost of $62,822.69, resulting in an ICER of $273,568.01/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were most sensitive to the price of zolbetuximab. Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX had 0% cost-effectiveness at the willingness-to-pay thresholds of $150,000/QALY in the United States and $38,188/QALY in China.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX may be a cost-effective option for patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma when the price of zolbetuximab reduced by 83.37% ($367.7/100 mg) in the United States and 82.25% ($110.8/100 mg) in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562848241297052"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241297052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or unresectable metastatic gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma have limited first-line treatment options and a poor prognosis. The GLOW clinical trial showed that zolbetuximab plus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) significantly prolonged these patients' overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Objectives: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of zolbetuximab plus CAPOX as a first-line treatment for HER2-negative locally advanced or unresectable metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma in the United States and China.

Design: The cost-effective analysis.

Methods: Based on the GLOW clinical trial data (NCT03653507), we constructed a 10-year Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the zolbetuximab or placebo plus CAPOX treatment regimen. Only direct medical costs were considered. The primary outcomes of the model were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were employed to assess the robustness of the model.

Results: In the United States, zolbetuximab plus CAPOX added 0.24 QALYs and resulted in an incremental cost of $196,791.11 compared with placebo plus CAPOX, which had an ICER of $821,515.65 per QALY gained. For China, the zolbetuximab group gained 0.23 QALYs at an incremental cost of $62,822.69, resulting in an ICER of $273,568.01/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were most sensitive to the price of zolbetuximab. Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX had 0% cost-effectiveness at the willingness-to-pay thresholds of $150,000/QALY in the United States and $38,188/QALY in China.

Conclusion: Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX may be a cost-effective option for patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma when the price of zolbetuximab reduced by 83.37% ($367.7/100 mg) in the United States and 82.25% ($110.8/100 mg) in China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唑贝妥昔单抗加CAPOX治疗ClDN18.2阳性胃癌或胃食管交界腺癌的一线治疗:成本效益分析。
背景:HER2阴性局部晚期或无法切除的转移性胃癌和胃食管交界处(G/GEJ)腺癌患者的一线治疗选择有限,预后较差。GLOW临床试验显示,唑贝妥昔单抗加卡培他滨加奥沙利铂(CAPOX)能显著延长这些患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS):本研究评估了在美国和中国,唑贝妥昔单抗加CAPOX作为一线治疗HER2阴性局部晚期或不可切除转移性G/GEJ腺癌的成本效益:成本效益分析:根据 GLOW 临床试验数据(NCT03653507),我们构建了一个 10 年马尔可夫模型,以评估唑贝妥珠单抗或安慰剂加 CAPOX 治疗方案的成本效益。该模型仅考虑了直接医疗成本。该模型的主要结果是质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本效益比(ICERs)。为评估模型的稳健性,采用了单向和概率敏感性分析:在美国,唑贝妥珠单抗联合CAPOX可增加0.24 QALY,与安慰剂联合CAPOX相比,增量成本为196,791.11美元,而安慰剂联合CAPOX每QALY增益的ICER为821,515.65美元。在中国,唑贝妥珠单抗组获得了0.23 QALY,增量成本为62,822.69美元,ICER为273,568.01美元/QALY。单向敏感性分析表明,研究结果对唑贝妥昔单抗的价格最为敏感。在美国,唑贝妥昔单抗加CAPOX在支付意愿阈值为150,000美元/QALY时的成本效益为0%;在中国,唑贝妥昔单抗加CAPOX在支付意愿阈值为38,188美元/QALY时的成本效益为0%:结论:当唑贝妥昔单抗的价格在美国降低83.37%(367.7美元/100毫克),在中国降低82.25%(110.8美元/100毫克)时,唑贝妥昔单抗联合CAPOX治疗局部晚期、不可切除或转移性G/GEJ腺癌患者可能是一种具有成本效益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Raising the bar in ulcerative colitis management. Clinical course for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic pseudocysts due to severe acute or chronic pancreatitis. Colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing is revolutionizing intestinal therapeutics, diagnosis, and microbiome research. First-line treatment with zolbetuximab plus CAPOX for ClDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease: concomitant IMID or paradoxical therapeutic effect? A scoping review on anti-IL-12/23 and anti-IL-23 antibodies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1