Exploring the use of COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic tests among displaced populations in Iraq: findings from a pilot project in four IDP camps.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Conflict and Health Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1186/s13031-024-00623-3
Lara Abou Ammar, Caitlin M Wolfe, Lamiaa Nagib, Mohammed Slebei, Sezan Shawkat, Dilman Amo, Raveen Abdullah, Rawshan Abdulmalik, Hiwa Muhammed Amin, Huda Shafiq, Shivan Hafthalah, Aso Qahraman, Jirjees Mohammed, Hassan Ghawji, Srinath Satyanarayana, Nevin Wilson, Sanjay Sarin, Kekeletso Kao, Nellie Ghusayni
{"title":"Exploring the use of COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic tests among displaced populations in Iraq: findings from a pilot project in four IDP camps.","authors":"Lara Abou Ammar, Caitlin M Wolfe, Lamiaa Nagib, Mohammed Slebei, Sezan Shawkat, Dilman Amo, Raveen Abdullah, Rawshan Abdulmalik, Hiwa Muhammed Amin, Huda Shafiq, Shivan Hafthalah, Aso Qahraman, Jirjees Mohammed, Hassan Ghawji, Srinath Satyanarayana, Nevin Wilson, Sanjay Sarin, Kekeletso Kao, Nellie Ghusayni","doi":"10.1186/s13031-024-00623-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>IOM piloted the use of Ag RDTs for COVID-19 in Iraq, in collaboration with FIND, the Global Alliance for Diagnostics, to facilitate access to testing and understand barriers and opportunities for testing in a displacement context. The purpose was to (i) evaluate the performance metrics of the Sure Status COVID-19 Antigen Card Test in this population; (ii) compare Ag RDT results across high- and low-probability cases, vaccination status, and symptom severity; and (iii) report participant perspectives on Ag RDT use for COVID-19 and other diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis was conducted using de-identified cross-sectional data collected from November 2022-March 2023 in four IDP camps in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Data was collected during the recording, reporting, and monitoring processes of the pilot project using Ag RDTs for COVID-19 among displaced populations. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted in Stata (version 17).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>9,346 Sure Status Ag RDTs were performed from November 2022-March 2023. Observed performance metrics were as follows: sensitivity = 72.73% (95% CI: 69.56-75.80%); specificity = 99.74% (95% CI: 99.39-100%), PPV = 92.31% (95% CI: 92.31-94.15%), and NPV = 98.85% (95% CI: 98.11-99.58%). Ag RDT uptake was higher among women and symptomatic individuals, and preference for Ag RDTs was especially strong among illiterate respondents. The overall positivity of Ag RDTs and PCR results in this population remained lower than national averages. Concerningly, 23.39% of respondents declined an Ag RDT because they did not believe in COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot program was among the first to explore Ag RDT use in Iraqi Kurdistan. Over 99% of respondents reported satisfaction with their experience, and over 90% wanted to see Ag RDTs available for other diseases. Findings can inform implementation of RDTs and screening protocols for other infectious diseases, and patient perspectives on Ag RDTs for testing and screening of COVID-19 among displaced populations can inform health programming within Iraq and globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00623-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: IOM piloted the use of Ag RDTs for COVID-19 in Iraq, in collaboration with FIND, the Global Alliance for Diagnostics, to facilitate access to testing and understand barriers and opportunities for testing in a displacement context. The purpose was to (i) evaluate the performance metrics of the Sure Status COVID-19 Antigen Card Test in this population; (ii) compare Ag RDT results across high- and low-probability cases, vaccination status, and symptom severity; and (iii) report participant perspectives on Ag RDT use for COVID-19 and other diseases.

Methods: Secondary analysis was conducted using de-identified cross-sectional data collected from November 2022-March 2023 in four IDP camps in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Data was collected during the recording, reporting, and monitoring processes of the pilot project using Ag RDTs for COVID-19 among displaced populations. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted in Stata (version 17).

Results: 9,346 Sure Status Ag RDTs were performed from November 2022-March 2023. Observed performance metrics were as follows: sensitivity = 72.73% (95% CI: 69.56-75.80%); specificity = 99.74% (95% CI: 99.39-100%), PPV = 92.31% (95% CI: 92.31-94.15%), and NPV = 98.85% (95% CI: 98.11-99.58%). Ag RDT uptake was higher among women and symptomatic individuals, and preference for Ag RDTs was especially strong among illiterate respondents. The overall positivity of Ag RDTs and PCR results in this population remained lower than national averages. Concerningly, 23.39% of respondents declined an Ag RDT because they did not believe in COVID-19.

Conclusions: This pilot program was among the first to explore Ag RDT use in Iraqi Kurdistan. Over 99% of respondents reported satisfaction with their experience, and over 90% wanted to see Ag RDTs available for other diseases. Findings can inform implementation of RDTs and screening protocols for other infectious diseases, and patient perspectives on Ag RDTs for testing and screening of COVID-19 among displaced populations can inform health programming within Iraq and globally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索在伊拉克流离失所者中使用 COVID-19 抗原快速诊断测试:在四个国内流离失所者营地开展的试点项目的结果。
背景:国际移民组织(IOM)与全球诊断联盟(FIND)合作,在伊拉克试行 COVID-19 的 Ag RDT 检测,以方便人们接受检测,并了解在流离失所情况下进行检测的障碍和机遇。目的是:(i) 评估 Sure Status COVID-19 抗原卡测试在该人群中的性能指标;(ii) 比较高概率和低概率病例、疫苗接种状况和症状严重程度的 Ag RDT 结果;(iii) 报告参与者对使用 Ag RDT 检测 COVID-19 和其他疾病的看法:使用 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区四个境内流离失所者营地收集的去身份化横截面数据进行二次分析。数据是在试点项目的记录、报告和监测过程中收集的,试点项目使用 Ag RDTs 在流离失所者中检测 COVID-19。使用 Stata(17 版)进行了描述性统计和双变量分析:从 2022 年 11 月到 2023 年 3 月,共进行了 9346 次肯定状态 Ag RDT 检测。观察到的性能指标如下:灵敏度=72.73%(95% CI:69.56-75.80%);特异性=99.74%(95% CI:99.39-100%),PPV=92.31%(95% CI:92.31-94.15%),NPV=98.85%(95% CI:98.11-99.58%)。女性和有症状者对 Ag RDT 的接受率较高,文盲受访者对 Ag RDT 的偏好尤为强烈。在这一人群中,Ag RDT 和 PCR 结果的总体阳性率仍然低于全国平均水平。令人担忧的是,23.39% 的受访者因不相信 COVID-19 而拒绝接受 Ag RDT 检测:该试点项目是伊拉克库尔德斯坦最早探索农业 RDT 使用的项目之一。超过 99% 的受访者对他们的经历表示满意,超过 90% 的受访者希望看到 Ag RDT 用于其他疾病。研究结果可为其他传染病的RDT和筛查方案的实施提供参考,而病人对用于流离失所人群中COVID-19检测和筛查的Ag RDT的看法可为伊拉克和全球的健康计划提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the use of COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic tests among displaced populations in Iraq: findings from a pilot project in four IDP camps. Exploring relationships between conflict intensity, forced displacement, and healthcare attacks: a retrospective analysis from Syria, 2016-2022. Feasibility and challenges in sustaining a community based surveillance system in post-Ebola Sierra Leone. Integrating mental health and psychosocial support into economic inclusion programming for displaced families in Ecuador. Maternal and newborn health prioritization in Yobe State, Nigeria: analysis of stakeholders' perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1