Coping strategies for managing diabetes distress in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study on use and perceived usefulness.

Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1462196
Jiska Embaye, Frank Jan Snoek, Maartje de Wit
{"title":"Coping strategies for managing diabetes distress in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study on use and perceived usefulness.","authors":"Jiska Embaye, Frank Jan Snoek, Maartje de Wit","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1462196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to identify the use of coping strategies employed by adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes to manage diabetes distress, using data provided by persons with lived experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with diabetes completed an anonymous online survey on Diabetes.co.uk, describing their coping strategies. A follow-up survey assessed the frequency of use and perceived usefulness of these strategies. Statistical analyses, including Mann-Whitney U tests, compared strategy use and usefulness between participants with low vs. high diabetes distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>625 adults with T1D or T2D completed the survey (mean age 56.3 years; 58.9% were female). Problem-focused strategies, \"Taking care of my diabetes\" and \"Eating healthy,\" were most frequently used and perceived as useful. Emotion-focused strategies such as \"Expressing my emotions (crying or being angry)\" were less used and perceived less useful. Participants with low vs. diabetes distress showed differences in strategy use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults with T1D and T2D use various coping strategies for diabetes distress, with problem-focused coping being more common and found useful than emotion-focused coping. Providing individuals with a list of effective coping strategies can enhance their awareness and adoption of new strategies. Integrating personalized coping strategies into interventions can better support diabetes management.</p>","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":"5 ","pages":"1462196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1462196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the use of coping strategies employed by adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes to manage diabetes distress, using data provided by persons with lived experiences.

Methods: Adults with diabetes completed an anonymous online survey on Diabetes.co.uk, describing their coping strategies. A follow-up survey assessed the frequency of use and perceived usefulness of these strategies. Statistical analyses, including Mann-Whitney U tests, compared strategy use and usefulness between participants with low vs. high diabetes distress.

Results: 625 adults with T1D or T2D completed the survey (mean age 56.3 years; 58.9% were female). Problem-focused strategies, "Taking care of my diabetes" and "Eating healthy," were most frequently used and perceived as useful. Emotion-focused strategies such as "Expressing my emotions (crying or being angry)" were less used and perceived less useful. Participants with low vs. diabetes distress showed differences in strategy use.

Conclusions: Adults with T1D and T2D use various coping strategies for diabetes distress, with problem-focused coping being more common and found useful than emotion-focused coping. Providing individuals with a list of effective coping strategies can enhance their awareness and adoption of new strategies. Integrating personalized coping strategies into interventions can better support diabetes management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1 型和 2 型成人糖尿病患者控制糖尿病困扰的应对策略:关于使用情况和感知有用性的横断面研究。
目的:本研究的目的是利用亲身经历者提供的数据,确定 1 型和 2 型糖尿病成人患者为控制糖尿病困扰而采用的应对策略:方法:成年糖尿病患者在 Diabetes.co.uk 上完成匿名在线调查,描述他们的应对策略。一项后续调查评估了这些策略的使用频率和感知有用性。统计分析(包括曼-惠特尼U检验)比较了糖尿病困扰程度低与高的参与者之间的策略使用情况和有用性:625名患有T1D或T2D的成年人完成了调查(平均年龄56.3岁;58.9%为女性)。以问题为中心的策略,如 "照顾好我的糖尿病 "和 "健康饮食",使用频率最高,也被认为最有用。而 "表达我的情绪(哭泣或愤怒)"等以情绪为中心的策略则使用较少,也不太有用。受糖尿病困扰程度低的参与者与受糖尿病困扰程度高的参与者在策略使用上存在差异:结论:患有 T1D 和 T2D 的成年人会使用各种应对糖尿病困扰的策略,其中以问题为中心的应对策略比以情绪为中心的应对策略更常见,也更有用。向患者提供有效的应对策略清单可以提高他们对新策略的认识和采用。将个性化应对策略纳入干预措施,可以更好地支持糖尿病管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilization of basic diabetes mellitus services among adult patients with diabetes mellitus at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital diabetes clinic, Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Optimizing glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: the impact of the GLIDE program's personalized digital health intervention. Metabolic syndrome among type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Novel antidiabetic therapies in patients with peripheral artery disease: current perspective. Editorial: Gestational diabetes: where are we and where are we going?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1