Control Allocation Approach Using Differential Steering to Compensate for Steering Actuator Failure

IF 4.6 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1109/OJITS.2024.3492115
Alexander Seiffer;Michael Frey;Frank Gauterin
{"title":"Control Allocation Approach Using Differential Steering to Compensate for Steering Actuator Failure","authors":"Alexander Seiffer;Michael Frey;Frank Gauterin","doi":"10.1109/OJITS.2024.3492115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wheel-selective drives on the steered axle of a vehicle with Ackermann steering allow for the generation of steering torque without the use of a steering actuator. If different drive torques are applied to the left and right driven wheels, their effect on the steering torque is not balanced, and a resulting steering torque remains (differential steering). Thus, the function of a steering actuator can be replaced, e.g., in case of a failure. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of controlling a vehicle using differential steering. However, the vehicle dynamics during the failure-induced transition from actuator-based to differential steering control have not been thoroughly investigated. In this work, we utilize a cascaded vehicle dynamics control approach with control allocation to distribute the total drive and steering torques to the available actuators in an overactuated chassis system. Based on both simulation studies and validation experiments with a demonstrator vehicle, we investigate the vehicle dynamics immediately following actuator failures. Our cascaded approach ensures precise vehicle guidance in both nominal and redundancy mode via differential steering. After a sudden actuator failure, vehicle guidance is reliably maintained, even in dynamic driving conditions, as the approach also considers the effect of drive torque distribution on the total yaw torque (torque vectoring). The analyses conducted using the proposed approach demonstrate that a safe transition to cross-actuator functional redundancy after an actuator failure is achievable. Consequently, differential steering can be evaluated as a suitable basis for cross-actuator functional redundancy concepts to enable fault-tolerant operation of steer-by-wire systems.","PeriodicalId":100631,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"756-773"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10742943","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10742943/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wheel-selective drives on the steered axle of a vehicle with Ackermann steering allow for the generation of steering torque without the use of a steering actuator. If different drive torques are applied to the left and right driven wheels, their effect on the steering torque is not balanced, and a resulting steering torque remains (differential steering). Thus, the function of a steering actuator can be replaced, e.g., in case of a failure. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of controlling a vehicle using differential steering. However, the vehicle dynamics during the failure-induced transition from actuator-based to differential steering control have not been thoroughly investigated. In this work, we utilize a cascaded vehicle dynamics control approach with control allocation to distribute the total drive and steering torques to the available actuators in an overactuated chassis system. Based on both simulation studies and validation experiments with a demonstrator vehicle, we investigate the vehicle dynamics immediately following actuator failures. Our cascaded approach ensures precise vehicle guidance in both nominal and redundancy mode via differential steering. After a sudden actuator failure, vehicle guidance is reliably maintained, even in dynamic driving conditions, as the approach also considers the effect of drive torque distribution on the total yaw torque (torque vectoring). The analyses conducted using the proposed approach demonstrate that a safe transition to cross-actuator functional redundancy after an actuator failure is achievable. Consequently, differential steering can be evaluated as a suitable basis for cross-actuator functional redundancy concepts to enable fault-tolerant operation of steer-by-wire systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用差动转向补偿转向执行器故障的控制分配方法
采用阿克曼转向系统的车辆转向轴上的车轮选择驱动装置可在不使用转向传动装置的情况下产生转向扭矩。如果对左右从动轮施加不同的驱动扭矩,它们对转向扭矩的影响并不平衡,因此仍会产生转向扭矩(差速转向)。因此,转向执行器的功能可以被替代,例如在发生故障时。以往的研究已经证明了使用差速转向控制车辆的有效性。然而,从基于致动器的转向控制到差速转向控制的故障诱发过渡期间的车辆动态尚未得到深入研究。在这项工作中,我们采用了一种级联车辆动力学控制方法,通过控制分配将总驱动扭矩和转向扭矩分配给过度致动底盘系统中的可用致动器。基于模拟研究和示范车辆的验证实验,我们研究了致动器失效后的车辆动态。我们的级联方法可通过差动转向确保车辆在标称和冗余模式下的精确制导。在致动器突然失效后,由于该方法还考虑了驱动扭矩分布对总偏航扭矩(扭矩矢量)的影响,因此即使在动态驾驶条件下,车辆也能可靠地保持导向。使用所提出的方法进行的分析表明,在致动器发生故障后,可以安全地过渡到跨致动器功能冗余。因此,可以将差动转向评估为跨执行器功能冗余概念的合适基础,以实现线控转向系统的容错操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictor-Based CACC Design for Heterogeneous Vehicles With Distinct Input Delays NLOS Dies Twice: Challenges and Solutions of V2X for Cooperative Perception Control Allocation Approach Using Differential Steering to Compensate for Steering Actuator Failure Path Planning Optimization of Smart Vehicle With Fast Converging Distance-Dependent PSO Algorithm An Extensible Python Open-Source Simulation Platform for Developing and Benchmarking Bus Holding Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1