{"title":"MnO2 nanoparticles supported on graphitic carbon nitride as an electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution","authors":"Aušrinė Zabielaitė, Virginija Kepenienė, Dijana Šimkūnaitė, Raminta Stagniūnaitė, Vitalija Jasulaitienė, Giedrius Stalnionis, Jūratė Vaičiūnienė, Loreta Tamašauskaitė-Tamašiūnaitė and Eugenijus Norkus","doi":"10.1039/D4NJ03407D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The aim of this study is to present a straightforward methodology for the preparation of non-precious metal catalysts comprising MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small> and carbonaceous materials, namely graphite powder (C), graphitic carbon nitride (gCN), and graphitic carbon nitride/graphite powder (gCN/C) substrates. The morphology and composition of the prepared MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/C, MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>–gCN, and MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>–gCN/C catalysts have been investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). The electrochemical performance of the prepared MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/C, MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>–gCN, and MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>–gCN/C catalysts has been investigated for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution (OER) reaction using cyclic and linear voltammetry. All of the investigated catalysts exhibited enhanced electrocatalytic activity with regard to the ORR and OER processes when compared with the bare substrates. The MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>–gCN/C catalyst was found to be the most efficient catalyst for both investigated reactions when compared with MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>/C and MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>–gCN. The MnO<small><sub>2</sub></small>–gCN/C catalyst demonstrated the most positive ORR onset potential of 0.9 V and the most negative OER onset potential of 1.53 V. Furthermore, it demonstrated remarkable stability, retaining approximately 85% of its initial signal after a continuous test of 24 hours in both long-term ORR and OER processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":95,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of Chemistry","volume":" 46","pages":" 19389-19402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/nj/d4nj03407d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study is to present a straightforward methodology for the preparation of non-precious metal catalysts comprising MnO2 and carbonaceous materials, namely graphite powder (C), graphitic carbon nitride (gCN), and graphitic carbon nitride/graphite powder (gCN/C) substrates. The morphology and composition of the prepared MnO2/C, MnO2–gCN, and MnO2–gCN/C catalysts have been investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). The electrochemical performance of the prepared MnO2/C, MnO2–gCN, and MnO2–gCN/C catalysts has been investigated for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution (OER) reaction using cyclic and linear voltammetry. All of the investigated catalysts exhibited enhanced electrocatalytic activity with regard to the ORR and OER processes when compared with the bare substrates. The MnO2–gCN/C catalyst was found to be the most efficient catalyst for both investigated reactions when compared with MnO2/C and MnO2–gCN. The MnO2–gCN/C catalyst demonstrated the most positive ORR onset potential of 0.9 V and the most negative OER onset potential of 1.53 V. Furthermore, it demonstrated remarkable stability, retaining approximately 85% of its initial signal after a continuous test of 24 hours in both long-term ORR and OER processes.