Management of hereditary angioedema attacks by patients on long-term prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy only.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Allergy and asthma proceedings Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.2500/aap.2025.46.240096
William R Lumry, Anete S Grumach, Stephen D Betschel, Cristine Radojicic, Sally van Kooten, Markus Heckmann, Sherry Danese, Neil Malloy, Ledia Goga, Mar Guilarte
{"title":"Management of hereditary angioedema attacks by patients on long-term prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy only.","authors":"William R Lumry, Anete S Grumach, Stephen D Betschel, Cristine Radojicic, Sally van Kooten, Markus Heckmann, Sherry Danese, Neil Malloy, Ledia Goga, Mar Guilarte","doi":"10.2500/aap.2025.46.240096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the use of long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for hereditary angioedema (HAE), the risk of having an attack remains and patients with HAE and on LTP may still experience attacks that can be life threatening. However, the behavioralpatterns and perspectives surrounding HAE attack management by patients on LTP are not fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This survey aimed to better understand and compare the behavioral patterns and perspectives, including attitudesand perceptions associated with on-demand treatment among patients on LTP versus those using on-demand therapy only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People living with HAE were recruited by the US Hereditary Angioedema Association to complete a 20-minute online survey between September 6 and October 19, 2022. Participants were stratified by treatment (50% using LTP [+ondemand therapy], 50% on-demand therapy only).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents included 107 patients with HAE (mean age, 41 years [range, 16-83 years]). Patients using LTP reported treating a mean +/- standard deviation 84.8% +/- 23.8% of their HAE attacks compared with a mean +/- standard deviation75.6% +/- 27.5% for patients with on-demand only treatment. Similar percentages of patients on LTP versus patients on-demand only reported always carrying on-demand treatment when away from home (35% versus 38%) and modifying their daily lives to minimize the occurrence of HAE attacks, which included avoiding potential triggers (42.9% versus 45.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although patients on LTP treat a higher percentage of their attacks compared with patients with on-demand only treatment, both groups reported similar behaviors in terms of carrying on-demand treatment when away from home and modifying their daily lives to minimize the occurrence of HAE attacks. These findings highlight the importance of understanding patient perspectives and behaviors in the management of HAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.240096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the use of long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for hereditary angioedema (HAE), the risk of having an attack remains and patients with HAE and on LTP may still experience attacks that can be life threatening. However, the behavioralpatterns and perspectives surrounding HAE attack management by patients on LTP are not fully understood.

Objective: This survey aimed to better understand and compare the behavioral patterns and perspectives, including attitudesand perceptions associated with on-demand treatment among patients on LTP versus those using on-demand therapy only.

Methods: People living with HAE were recruited by the US Hereditary Angioedema Association to complete a 20-minute online survey between September 6 and October 19, 2022. Participants were stratified by treatment (50% using LTP [+ondemand therapy], 50% on-demand therapy only).

Results: Respondents included 107 patients with HAE (mean age, 41 years [range, 16-83 years]). Patients using LTP reported treating a mean +/- standard deviation 84.8% +/- 23.8% of their HAE attacks compared with a mean +/- standard deviation75.6% +/- 27.5% for patients with on-demand only treatment. Similar percentages of patients on LTP versus patients on-demand only reported always carrying on-demand treatment when away from home (35% versus 38%) and modifying their daily lives to minimize the occurrence of HAE attacks, which included avoiding potential triggers (42.9% versus 45.5%).

Conclusion: Although patients on LTP treat a higher percentage of their attacks compared with patients with on-demand only treatment, both groups reported similar behaviors in terms of carrying on-demand treatment when away from home and modifying their daily lives to minimize the occurrence of HAE attacks. These findings highlight the importance of understanding patient perspectives and behaviors in the management of HAE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传性血管性水肿发作患者长期预防治疗与按需治疗的对比。
背景:尽管对遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)采用了长期预防疗法(LTP),但发作的风险依然存在,接受 LTP 治疗的 HAE 患者仍有可能发作,危及生命。然而,人们对接受 LTP 治疗的 HAE 患者在处理 HAE 发作时的行为模式和观点尚未完全了解:本调查旨在更好地了解和比较接受 LTP 治疗的患者与仅接受按需治疗的患者的行为模式和观点,包括与按需治疗相关的态度和认知:美国遗传性血管性水肿协会招募了 HAE 患者,让他们在 2022 年 9 月 6 日至 10 月 19 日期间完成一项 20 分钟的在线调查。参与者按治疗方法进行分层(50%使用LTP[+按需治疗],50%仅使用按需治疗):受访者包括 107 名 HAE 患者(平均年龄 41 岁 [范围 16-83 岁])。使用 LTP 治疗的患者平均+/-标准差为 84.8% +/- 23.8%,而仅按需治疗的患者平均+/-标准差为 75.6% +/- 27.5%。与按需治疗的患者相比,接受LTP治疗的患者表示离家时始终携带按需治疗药物(35%对38%),并表示会调整日常生活以尽量减少HAE发作,包括避免潜在的诱发因素(42.9%对45.5%):尽管接受 LTP 治疗的患者与仅接受按需治疗的患者相比,其发作比例更高,但两组患者在外出时按需治疗和调整日常生活以尽量减少 HAE 发作方面的行为相似。这些发现凸显了了解患者在治疗 HAE 过程中的观点和行为的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Management of hereditary angioedema attacks by patients on long-term prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy only. Real-world surveillance of standardized quality (SQ) house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablets for 3 years in Japan. A case of a rash after tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis and meningococcal vaccination. Eating increases disease activity in pediatric patients with symptomatic dermographism. A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the bidirectional association between asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1