How power and knowledge hierarchies affect communication in intrapartum care: findings from public health facilities in two southern Indian districts.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06973-3
Abha Rao, V Srinidhi, Baneen Karachiwala, Sanjana Santosh, Shreelata Rao Seshadri, Sophia Thomas, Sreeparna Chattopadhyay, Anuradha Sreevathsa, Gita Sen
{"title":"How power and knowledge hierarchies affect communication in intrapartum care: findings from public health facilities in two southern Indian districts.","authors":"Abha Rao, V Srinidhi, Baneen Karachiwala, Sanjana Santosh, Shreelata Rao Seshadri, Sophia Thomas, Sreeparna Chattopadhyay, Anuradha Sreevathsa, Gita Sen","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06973-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective communication is a key element of medical care; it can foster a warm interpersonal relationship, facilitate the exchange of information, and enable shared decision-making. In the context of obstetric care, it is associated with a range of positive clinical and social outcomes for mother and baby. Extant communication frameworks and respectful maternity care (RMC) guidelines emphasize the importance of effective communication during intrapartum care. Yet, studies conducted in Indian public health settings suggest that there are gaps in the implementation of RMC guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a larger study on disrespect and abuse in Indian public hospitals, we studied the nature of communication in the intrapartum context and the extent to which it is respectful. The study is based on interviews with 29 providers across different levels of public health facilities. Interviews were translated, transcribed, and thematically coded. We examined codes related to communication to understand what kinds of communication occur during intrapartum care and the role played by knowledge and power hierarchies. We then considered their implications for RMC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four types of communication that occurred in the context of intrapartum care: (a) compassionate, to comfort and support the laboring woman, (b) factual, to obtain or provide information or updates, (c) prescriptive, to obtain consent and cooperation from the woman and her family members, and (d) defensive, to protect against accusations of poor care. Knowledge and power hierarchies operated differently in each type of communication, with prescriptive and defensive communication more likely to be disrespectful than others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that successful implementation of RMC guidelines requires greater attention to knowledge and power hierarchies, and an understanding of the ways in which they operate in a clinical setting. Integrating this understanding into guidelines, medical education, training programmes, and interventions will facilitate effective and respectful communication during maternity care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"781"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06973-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective communication is a key element of medical care; it can foster a warm interpersonal relationship, facilitate the exchange of information, and enable shared decision-making. In the context of obstetric care, it is associated with a range of positive clinical and social outcomes for mother and baby. Extant communication frameworks and respectful maternity care (RMC) guidelines emphasize the importance of effective communication during intrapartum care. Yet, studies conducted in Indian public health settings suggest that there are gaps in the implementation of RMC guidelines.

Methods: As part of a larger study on disrespect and abuse in Indian public hospitals, we studied the nature of communication in the intrapartum context and the extent to which it is respectful. The study is based on interviews with 29 providers across different levels of public health facilities. Interviews were translated, transcribed, and thematically coded. We examined codes related to communication to understand what kinds of communication occur during intrapartum care and the role played by knowledge and power hierarchies. We then considered their implications for RMC.

Results: We identified four types of communication that occurred in the context of intrapartum care: (a) compassionate, to comfort and support the laboring woman, (b) factual, to obtain or provide information or updates, (c) prescriptive, to obtain consent and cooperation from the woman and her family members, and (d) defensive, to protect against accusations of poor care. Knowledge and power hierarchies operated differently in each type of communication, with prescriptive and defensive communication more likely to be disrespectful than others.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that successful implementation of RMC guidelines requires greater attention to knowledge and power hierarchies, and an understanding of the ways in which they operate in a clinical setting. Integrating this understanding into guidelines, medical education, training programmes, and interventions will facilitate effective and respectful communication during maternity care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力和知识等级如何影响产前护理中的沟通:印度南部两个地区公共卫生机构的调查结果。
背景:有效的沟通是医疗护理的关键因素;它可以促进温暖的人际关系、促进信息交流并促成共同决策。在产科护理中,有效沟通可为母婴带来一系列积极的临床和社会效果。现有的沟通框架和尊重产妇护理(RMC)指南都强调了产前护理中有效沟通的重要性。然而,在印度公共卫生环境中进行的研究表明,在实施尊重产妇护理指南方面存在差距:作为印度公立医院不尊重和虐待行为大型研究的一部分,我们研究了产前沟通的性质及其尊重程度。这项研究基于对不同级别公立医疗机构中 29 名医护人员的访谈。我们对访谈内容进行了翻译、转录和主题编码。我们研究了与沟通相关的编码,以了解在产前护理过程中会发生哪些类型的沟通,以及知识和权力等级所起的作用。然后,我们考虑了这些代码对 RMC 的影响:我们确定了产前护理中出现的四种沟通方式:(a)同情式,用于安慰和支持产妇;(b)事实式,用于获取或提供信息或最新情况;(c)指令式,用于征得产妇及其家人的同意与合作;以及(d)防御式,用于防止被指责护理不周。在每种沟通方式中,知识和权力等级的作用都不尽相同,指令性和防御性沟通比其他沟通方式更容易造成不尊重:我们的研究结果表明,要想成功实施 RMC 指南,就必须更加关注知识和权力等级制度,并了解它们在临床环境中的运作方式。将这种理解融入指南、医学教育、培训计划和干预措施中,将有助于在孕产妇护理过程中进行有效和相互尊重的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Differences in maternal and perinatal outcomes between Dutch and non-Western women in a midwife-led care setting: a retrospective cohort study. Self-monitoring blood pressure in pregnancy: evaluation of women's experiences of the BUMP trials. Ultrasound diagnosis of first trimester umbilical cord entanglement in monochorionic monoamniotic twins - case report and review of the literature. Effect of pregnancy intention on completion of maternity continuum of care in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clean delivery kit use in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1