Socio-cultural practices and experience of mothers' post stillbirth and newborn death: a population-based perspective from India.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06906-0
Moutushi Majumder, G Anil Kumar, Sarah Binte Ali, Sibin George, Siva Prasad Dora, Md Akbar, Shuchi Sree Akhouri, Sweta Kumari, Tanmay Mahapatra, Rakhi Dandona
{"title":"Socio-cultural practices and experience of mothers' post stillbirth and newborn death: a population-based perspective from India.","authors":"Moutushi Majumder, G Anil Kumar, Sarah Binte Ali, Sibin George, Siva Prasad Dora, Md Akbar, Shuchi Sree Akhouri, Sweta Kumari, Tanmay Mahapatra, Rakhi Dandona","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06906-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We report on post stillbirth and newborn death socio-cultural experience of women from a population-based representative sample in the Indian state of Bihar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A state-representative sample of 7,270 births between July 2020 and June 2021 was sampled, including 582 stillbirths and 831 newborn deaths. Detailed confidential interviews were conducted with the consenting women with stillbirth and newborn death to understand their post-birth experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 501 (86.1% participation) women with stillbirth and 717 (86.3% participation) with neonatal death provided interview. Able to talk to someone about their baby and receiving support to cope with their loss were reported by 369 (74.2%) and 398 (80.2%) women with stillbirth; these proportions were 76.7% and 77.3% for women with newborn deaths, respectively. More than 80% of these women reported spouses as their main source of support. At least one negative experience was reported by 150 (30.9%) and 233 (32.5%) women with stillbirth and newborn death, respectively. The most commonly reported negative experience was receiving insensitive/hurtful comments about the baby (18.6% for stillbirth and 20.4% for newborn deaths), followed by being blamed for the baby's death (14.3% for stillbirths and 15.0% for newborn deaths). The majority of women reported being verbally abused by the mother-in-law for both stillbirth (24, 63.2%) and newborn death (49, 64.5%); while 48 (67.6%) and 66 (61.7%) women were blamed by the mother-in-law for stillbirth and neonatal death, respectively. Most women with stillbirth (72.7%) and with neonatal death (77.1%) were asked to forget about their babies as a means to cope with their loss. Naming, seeing, and holding the stillborn were reported by 56 (11.2%), 229 (45.9%), and 64 (12.8%) women with a stillborn.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With one-third women with adverse birth outcome reporting negative experience, this translates into a significant number of women in India as it accounts for high numbers of stillbirths and newborn deaths globally. These population-based data can facilitate in designing interventions to improve post-partum experience for women with adverse birth outcomes in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"778"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06906-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We report on post stillbirth and newborn death socio-cultural experience of women from a population-based representative sample in the Indian state of Bihar.

Methods: A state-representative sample of 7,270 births between July 2020 and June 2021 was sampled, including 582 stillbirths and 831 newborn deaths. Detailed confidential interviews were conducted with the consenting women with stillbirth and newborn death to understand their post-birth experience.

Results: A total of 501 (86.1% participation) women with stillbirth and 717 (86.3% participation) with neonatal death provided interview. Able to talk to someone about their baby and receiving support to cope with their loss were reported by 369 (74.2%) and 398 (80.2%) women with stillbirth; these proportions were 76.7% and 77.3% for women with newborn deaths, respectively. More than 80% of these women reported spouses as their main source of support. At least one negative experience was reported by 150 (30.9%) and 233 (32.5%) women with stillbirth and newborn death, respectively. The most commonly reported negative experience was receiving insensitive/hurtful comments about the baby (18.6% for stillbirth and 20.4% for newborn deaths), followed by being blamed for the baby's death (14.3% for stillbirths and 15.0% for newborn deaths). The majority of women reported being verbally abused by the mother-in-law for both stillbirth (24, 63.2%) and newborn death (49, 64.5%); while 48 (67.6%) and 66 (61.7%) women were blamed by the mother-in-law for stillbirth and neonatal death, respectively. Most women with stillbirth (72.7%) and with neonatal death (77.1%) were asked to forget about their babies as a means to cope with their loss. Naming, seeing, and holding the stillborn were reported by 56 (11.2%), 229 (45.9%), and 64 (12.8%) women with a stillborn.

Conclusion: With one-third women with adverse birth outcome reporting negative experience, this translates into a significant number of women in India as it accounts for high numbers of stillbirths and newborn deaths globally. These population-based data can facilitate in designing interventions to improve post-partum experience for women with adverse birth outcomes in India.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死产和新生儿死亡后母亲的社会文化习俗和经历:基于印度人口的视角。
简介我们报告了印度比哈尔邦具有人口代表性样本中妇女死产和新生儿死亡后的社会文化经历:方法:对 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月期间的 7270 例分娩进行了具有邦代表性的抽样调查,其中包括 582 例死胎和 831 例新生儿死亡。对征得同意的死产和新生儿死亡产妇进行了详细的保密访谈,以了解她们的产后经历:共有 501 名(86.1% 参与)死产妇女和 717 名(86.3% 参与)新生儿死亡妇女接受了访谈。369名(74.2%)和398名(80.2%)死产妇女表示能够与他人谈论自己的婴儿,并获得了应对丧子之痛的支持;新生儿死亡妇女的这一比例分别为76.7%和77.3%。这些妇女中有 80% 以上称配偶是她们的主要支持来源。分别有 150 名(30.9%)和 233 名(32.5%)死产妇女和新生儿死亡妇女报告了至少一次负面经历。最常报告的负面经历是收到关于婴儿的不敏感/尖刻的评论(死产为 18.6%,新生儿死亡为 20.4%),其次是受到婴儿死亡的指责(死产为 14.3%,新生儿死亡为 15.0%)。大多数妇女表示,死产(24 人,63.2%)和新生儿死亡(49 人,64.5%)都受到了婆婆的辱骂;死产和新生儿死亡分别有 48 人(67.6%)和 66 人(61.7%)受到了婆婆的指责。大多数死产(72.7%)和新生儿死亡(77.1%)的妇女被要求忘记她们的孩子,以此来应对失去孩子的痛苦。分别有 56 名(11.2%)、229 名(45.9%)和 64 名(12.8%)死产妇女表示会命名、看望和抱着死产婴儿:三分之一有不良分娩结局的妇女报告了负面经历,这意味着印度有相当数量的妇女,因为在全球范围内,印度的死产和新生儿死亡人数都很高。这些以人口为基础的数据有助于设计干预措施,以改善印度不良分娩结局妇女的产后体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Differences in maternal and perinatal outcomes between Dutch and non-Western women in a midwife-led care setting: a retrospective cohort study. Self-monitoring blood pressure in pregnancy: evaluation of women's experiences of the BUMP trials. Ultrasound diagnosis of first trimester umbilical cord entanglement in monochorionic monoamniotic twins - case report and review of the literature. Effect of pregnancy intention on completion of maternity continuum of care in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clean delivery kit use in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1