{"title":"Tracheostomy: update on why, when and how.","authors":"Giulia Lais, Lise Piquilloud","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of this review is to summarize available data, including the most recent ones, to help develop the best possible strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation or who experience loss of airway-protecting mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Tracheostomy facilitates the weaning process by reducing the patient's work of breathing and increasing comfort. It thus allows for a reduction in sedation levels. It also helps with secretions clearance, facilitates disconnection from the ventilator, and enables earlier phonation, oral intake, and mobilization. Despite these advantages, tracheostomy does not reduce mortality and is associated with both early and late complications, particularly tracheal stenosis. The timing of tracheostomy remains a subject of debate, and only a personalized approach that considers each patient's specific characteristics can help find the best possible compromise between avoiding unnecessary delays and minimizing the risks of performing a needless invasive procedure. In the absence of contraindications, the percutaneous single dilator technique under fibroscopic guidance should be the first choice, but only if the team is properly trained.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A step-by-step individualized approach based on the available evidence allows identifying the best strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: The aim of this review is to summarize available data, including the most recent ones, to help develop the best possible strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation or who experience loss of airway-protecting mechanisms.
Recent findings: Tracheostomy facilitates the weaning process by reducing the patient's work of breathing and increasing comfort. It thus allows for a reduction in sedation levels. It also helps with secretions clearance, facilitates disconnection from the ventilator, and enables earlier phonation, oral intake, and mobilization. Despite these advantages, tracheostomy does not reduce mortality and is associated with both early and late complications, particularly tracheal stenosis. The timing of tracheostomy remains a subject of debate, and only a personalized approach that considers each patient's specific characteristics can help find the best possible compromise between avoiding unnecessary delays and minimizing the risks of performing a needless invasive procedure. In the absence of contraindications, the percutaneous single dilator technique under fibroscopic guidance should be the first choice, but only if the team is properly trained.
Summary: A step-by-step individualized approach based on the available evidence allows identifying the best strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.