Evaluation of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate with Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Integrated for Prognosticating Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events and Risk Stratification Among Acute Coronary Syndrome with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Inflammation Research Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JIR.S490790
Xunxun Feng, Yang Liu, Jiaqi Yang, Zhiming Zhou, Shiwei Yang, Yujie Zhou, Qianyun Guo
{"title":"Evaluation of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate with Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Integrated for Prognosticating Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events and Risk Stratification Among Acute Coronary Syndrome with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Xunxun Feng, Yang Liu, Jiaqi Yang, Zhiming Zhou, Shiwei Yang, Yujie Zhou, Qianyun Guo","doi":"10.2147/JIR.S490790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research aimed to address the critical need for effective prognostic tools in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by exploring the potential significance of integrating estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were the primary endpoint. Log rank test was conducted to compare the Kaplan-Meier curves across the overall follow-up period, and multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the association between the eGDR/NLR and MACCE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-four patients (9.5%) experienced MACCE including 15 cardiac deaths, 97 nonfatal MI, 120 TVR, and 10 strokes. Patients were distributed into low and high eGDR/NLR groups (lower eGDR [eGDR-L] group, higher eGDR [eGDR-H] group, lower NLR [NLR-L] group, and higher NLR [NLR-H] group) based on the median value of eGDR and NLR, further divided into four groups: eGDR-L + NLR-L, eGDR-H + NLR-L, eGDR-L + NLR-H, and eGDR-H + NLR-H. eGDR-L + NLR-H group exhibited significantly higher risks of MACCE (17.4%), compared to another three groups. An independent correlation between eGDR/NLR and MACCE was demonstrated by Cox regression analysis, establishing if the eGDR and NLR was treated as a continuous or categorical variable. Compared to eGDR-H + NLR-L group, patients in eGDR-L + NLR-H group had the uppermost MACCE risk (HR: 5.201; 95% CI 2.764-7.786; <i>P</i> < 0.001). A linear relationship between eGDR/ NLR and MACCE was showed by restricted cubic spline curves. Incorporating the eGDR and NLR toward the baseline risk model developed the precision of forecasting MACCE (baseline risk model-AUC: 0.611 vs baseline risk model + eGDR + NLR-AUC: 0.695, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining eGDR with NLR can be utilized to forecast long-term MACCE and substantially improve the accuracy of risk stratification in ACS patients with T2DM following PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inflammation Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"9193-9214"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inflammation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S490790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This research aimed to address the critical need for effective prognostic tools in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by exploring the potential significance of integrating estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

Methods: Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were the primary endpoint. Log rank test was conducted to compare the Kaplan-Meier curves across the overall follow-up period, and multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the association between the eGDR/NLR and MACCE.

Results: One hundred fifty-four patients (9.5%) experienced MACCE including 15 cardiac deaths, 97 nonfatal MI, 120 TVR, and 10 strokes. Patients were distributed into low and high eGDR/NLR groups (lower eGDR [eGDR-L] group, higher eGDR [eGDR-H] group, lower NLR [NLR-L] group, and higher NLR [NLR-H] group) based on the median value of eGDR and NLR, further divided into four groups: eGDR-L + NLR-L, eGDR-H + NLR-L, eGDR-L + NLR-H, and eGDR-H + NLR-H. eGDR-L + NLR-H group exhibited significantly higher risks of MACCE (17.4%), compared to another three groups. An independent correlation between eGDR/NLR and MACCE was demonstrated by Cox regression analysis, establishing if the eGDR and NLR was treated as a continuous or categorical variable. Compared to eGDR-H + NLR-L group, patients in eGDR-L + NLR-H group had the uppermost MACCE risk (HR: 5.201; 95% CI 2.764-7.786; P < 0.001). A linear relationship between eGDR/ NLR and MACCE was showed by restricted cubic spline curves. Incorporating the eGDR and NLR toward the baseline risk model developed the precision of forecasting MACCE (baseline risk model-AUC: 0.611 vs baseline risk model + eGDR + NLR-AUC: 0.695, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Combining eGDR with NLR can be utilized to forecast long-term MACCE and substantially improve the accuracy of risk stratification in ACS patients with T2DM following PCI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估估计葡萄糖排出率与中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的整合,以预示经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征合并 2 型糖尿病患者的不良心脑血管事件并进行风险分层。
研究目的本研究旨在通过探讨综合估计葡萄糖排出率(eGDR)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)的潜在意义,满足接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者对有效预后工具的迫切需求:主要终点为主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)。采用对数秩检验比较整个随访期的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线,并采用多变量 Cox 回归研究 eGDR/NLR 与 MACCE 之间的关联:结果:154 名患者(9.5%)发生了 MACCE,包括 15 例心源性死亡、97 例非致死性心肌梗死、120 例 TVR 和 10 例脑卒中。根据 eGDR 和 NLR 的中位值,将患者分为低 eGDR 组和高 eGDR/NLR 组(低 eGDR [eGDR-L] 组、高 eGDR [eGDR-H] 组、低 NLR [NLR-L] 组和高 NLR [NLR-H] 组),并进一步分为四组:eGDR-L + NLR-L、eGDR-H + NLR-L、eGDR-L + NLR-H 和 eGDR-H + NLR-H。eGDR-L + NLR-H 组发生 MACCE 的风险(17.4%)明显高于其他三组。Cox 回归分析表明,无论 eGDR 和 NLR 被视为连续变量还是分类变量,eGDR/NLR 与 MACCE 之间均存在独立相关性。与 eGDR-H + NLR-L 组相比,eGDR-L + NLR-H 组患者的 MACCE 风险最高(HR:5.201;95% CI 2.764-7.786;P <0.001)。限制性三次样条曲线显示 eGDR/ NLR 与 MACCE 之间存在线性关系。将 eGDR 和 NLR 纳入基线风险模型可提高 MACCE 的预测精度(基线风险模型-AUC:0.611 vs 基线风险模型 + eGDR + NLR-AUC:结论:结论:结合 eGDR 和 NLR 可用于预测长期 MACCE,大大提高了 PCI 术后 T2DM ACS 患者风险分层的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Inflammation Research
Journal of Inflammation Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
658
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings on the molecular basis, cell biology and pharmacology of inflammation.
期刊最新文献
High Humidity Alters Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Spleen Tissue: Insights into Rheumatoid Arthritis Progression. Bioinformatics Analysis and Experimental Validation to Identify Key Glycosylation-Related Genes in Asthma. Erratum: Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Systemic Immune Inflammation Index and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the RICAMIS Study [Corrigendum]. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Thromboembolic Events in Dermatomyositis in China: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis. The Role of Pyroptosis in the Progression and Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Urological Malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1