Totally Retroperitoneal One-Position Approach for Laparoscopic Radical Surgery in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Clinical Trial Evaluation.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-04293-1
Yan Xuechuan, Zhao Kai, Zhang Zongliang, Yin Xinbao, Zhu Guanqun, Yang Han, Wang Ke
{"title":"Totally Retroperitoneal One-Position Approach for Laparoscopic Radical Surgery in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Clinical Trial Evaluation.","authors":"Yan Xuechuan, Zhao Kai, Zhang Zongliang, Yin Xinbao, Zhu Guanqun, Yang Han, Wang Ke","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04293-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard of care for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) traditionally involved open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision. Despite the adoption of transabdominal laparoscopic one-stage nephroureterectomy to mitigate this, the persistently high rate of postoperative intestinal obstruction remains a clinical challenge. This study introduces an innovative approach: a single-position, completely retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy coupled with a 75-45-degree positional change for bladder cuff resection in the treatment of UTUC. The study further evaluates the clinical efficacy of this novel surgical technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 125 patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at our institution between May 2018 and December 2023. The experimental cohort comprised 65 individuals who received total retroperitoneal one-position laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (TROLN), complete with total intracorporeal bladder cuffing and distal ureterectomy. In contrast, the control cohort included 60 patients who had laparoscopic nephrectomy with a lower abdominal oblique incision for bladder sleeve resection. The study evaluated various perioperative metrics, such as operative duration, blood loss during surgery, incision size, resumption of oral intake postoperatively, drainage tube removal timeline, hospital stay duration, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment, and complication incidence. In addition, pathological and oncological outcomes were scrutinized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TROLN group exhibited pronounced benefits across various surgical outcomes, including reduced operative duration, minimized intraoperative blood loss, shorter incision lengths, lower postoperative pain assessments, expedited return to oral nutrition, swifter drain extraction, and a condensed overall hospitalization period (all P < 0. 05). However, the oncological outcomes showed no significant differences between the TROLN group and the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drawing from our clinical insights, TROLN is a safe and effective modified technique that offers advantages over traditional laparoscopic combined with open surgery for treating UTUC, including reduced invasiveness, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays. However, additional prospective studies are imperative to validate these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1135-1141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04293-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The standard of care for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) traditionally involved open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision. Despite the adoption of transabdominal laparoscopic one-stage nephroureterectomy to mitigate this, the persistently high rate of postoperative intestinal obstruction remains a clinical challenge. This study introduces an innovative approach: a single-position, completely retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy coupled with a 75-45-degree positional change for bladder cuff resection in the treatment of UTUC. The study further evaluates the clinical efficacy of this novel surgical technique.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 125 patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at our institution between May 2018 and December 2023. The experimental cohort comprised 65 individuals who received total retroperitoneal one-position laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (TROLN), complete with total intracorporeal bladder cuffing and distal ureterectomy. In contrast, the control cohort included 60 patients who had laparoscopic nephrectomy with a lower abdominal oblique incision for bladder sleeve resection. The study evaluated various perioperative metrics, such as operative duration, blood loss during surgery, incision size, resumption of oral intake postoperatively, drainage tube removal timeline, hospital stay duration, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment, and complication incidence. In addition, pathological and oncological outcomes were scrutinized.

Results: The TROLN group exhibited pronounced benefits across various surgical outcomes, including reduced operative duration, minimized intraoperative blood loss, shorter incision lengths, lower postoperative pain assessments, expedited return to oral nutrition, swifter drain extraction, and a condensed overall hospitalization period (all P < 0. 05). However, the oncological outcomes showed no significant differences between the TROLN group and the control group.

Conclusion: Drawing from our clinical insights, TROLN is a safe and effective modified technique that offers advantages over traditional laparoscopic combined with open surgery for treating UTUC, including reduced invasiveness, less bleeding, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays. However, additional prospective studies are imperative to validate these observations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上尿路尿路癌腹腔镜根治术的全腹膜后单位入路:临床试验评估
背景:上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的传统治疗标准是开腹肾切除术和膀胱袖带切除术。尽管经腹腹腔镜一期肾切除术的采用缓解了这一问题,但术后肠梗阻发生率居高不下仍是一项临床挑战。本研究引入了一种创新方法:单位置、完全腹膜后腹腔镜肾切除术,并在治疗UTUC时改变75-45度位置进行膀胱袖带切除。该研究进一步评估了这种新型手术技术的临床疗效:对2018年5月至2023年12月期间在我院接受根治性肾切除术的125名确诊为UTUC的患者进行了回顾性分析。实验队列包括 65 人,他们接受了全腹膜后单位腹腔镜肾切除术(TROLN),包括全体腔内膀胱袖带和远端尿管切除术。相比之下,对照组包括60名患者,他们在腹腔镜肾切除术中采用下腹部斜切口进行膀胱袖套切除。研究评估了围手术期的各种指标,如手术时间、术中失血量、切口大小、术后恢复口服、拔除引流管时间、住院时间、疼痛评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)和并发症发生率。此外,还对病理学和肿瘤学结果进行了仔细研究:结果:TROLN组在各种手术结果上都有明显优势,包括缩短手术时间、减少术中失血、缩短切口长度、降低术后疼痛评估、加快恢复口服营养、更快地拔出引流管以及缩短总体住院时间(均为P 结论:TROLN组在各种手术结果上都有明显优势,包括缩短手术时间、减少术中失血、缩短切口长度、降低术后疼痛评估、加快恢复口服营养、更快地拔出引流管以及缩短总体住院时间:根据我们的临床观察,TROLN 是一种安全有效的改良技术,与传统的腹腔镜联合开腹手术相比,它在治疗 UTUC 方面具有更多优势,包括创伤更小、出血更少、并发症更少以及住院时间更短。不过,还需要更多的前瞻性研究来验证这些观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Decision satisfaction and regret in patients undergoing ATOMS® adjustable sling for male urinary stress incontinence: data from a third level referral centre. Critical perspectives on proenkephalin A 119-159 for shock-associated acute kidney injury. Prostate MR image segmentation using a multi-stage network approach. Letter to the Editor: Exploring the influencing factors of abdominal aortic calcification events in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and non-CKD patients based on interpretable machine learning methods. Outcome of donor kidney function in living-related kidney transplant: observation from a single centre with 18 year experience in Malaysia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1