Determining factors for the appropriateness of soundscapes: A cross-sectional large-sample study in London (UK)a).

IF 2.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1121/10.0034418
Xiang Fang, Francesco Aletta, Andrew Mitchell, Tin Oberman, Jian Kang
{"title":"Determining factors for the appropriateness of soundscapes: A cross-sectional large-sample study in London (UK)a).","authors":"Xiang Fang, Francesco Aletta, Andrew Mitchell, Tin Oberman, Jian Kang","doi":"10.1121/10.0034418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the association between appropriateness and the pleasantness-eventfulness circumplex model, as well as the influencing environmental and personal factors, in accordance with the recommended questionnaire of ISO/TS 12913-2 (2018). A database was used, containing over 1000 soundscape surveys collected across eleven locations in London. Confirmatory factor analysis and the structural summary method were applied to validate the relationship between appropriateness and the pleasantness-eventfulness circumplex model, while linear multilevel models were developed to investigate the effect of personal and environmental factors on appropriateness. The findings highlight varying relationship between appropriateness and the pleasantness-eventfulness dimensions of the soundscape circumplex model. The effect of personal factors on appropriateness is not negligible, accounting for approximately 2.1% of the variance. In contrast to the effects of the categories of landscape composition and acoustic metrics, dominant sound source type is the most influential category of environmental factors, with natural sounds explaining the most variance at 6%. Traffic noise is negatively associated with appropriateness which varies by location, while human sounds are negatively associated with appropriateness when respondents were Asian/Asian British. The findings provide empirical evidence of the relationship between appropriateness and the soundscape circumplex model and offer comprehensive insights into the affecting factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"156 5","pages":"3588-3607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the association between appropriateness and the pleasantness-eventfulness circumplex model, as well as the influencing environmental and personal factors, in accordance with the recommended questionnaire of ISO/TS 12913-2 (2018). A database was used, containing over 1000 soundscape surveys collected across eleven locations in London. Confirmatory factor analysis and the structural summary method were applied to validate the relationship between appropriateness and the pleasantness-eventfulness circumplex model, while linear multilevel models were developed to investigate the effect of personal and environmental factors on appropriateness. The findings highlight varying relationship between appropriateness and the pleasantness-eventfulness dimensions of the soundscape circumplex model. The effect of personal factors on appropriateness is not negligible, accounting for approximately 2.1% of the variance. In contrast to the effects of the categories of landscape composition and acoustic metrics, dominant sound source type is the most influential category of environmental factors, with natural sounds explaining the most variance at 6%. Traffic noise is negatively associated with appropriateness which varies by location, while human sounds are negatively associated with appropriateness when respondents were Asian/Asian British. The findings provide empirical evidence of the relationship between appropriateness and the soundscape circumplex model and offer comprehensive insights into the affecting factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决定声音景观适当性的因素:英国伦敦横断面大样本研究a)。
本研究根据 ISO/TS 12913-2 (2018 年)推荐的调查问卷,研究了适宜性与愉悦度-愉悦性圆周模型之间的关联,以及影响因素中的环境和个人因素。使用的数据库包含在伦敦 11 个地点收集的 1000 多份声景调查。研究采用了确认性因子分析和结构总结法来验证适宜度与愉悦度-ventfulness圆周模型之间的关系,同时建立了线性多层次模型来研究个人和环境因素对适宜度的影响。研究结果表明,适宜度与声景环状模型中的愉悦度--ventfulness维度之间的关系各不相同。个人因素对适当性的影响不容忽视,约占方差的 2.1%。与景观构成和声学指标类别的影响不同,主要声源类型是影响最大的环境因素类别,其中自然声解释了最大的方差,占 6%。交通噪声与适宜性呈负相关,而适宜性因地点而异,当受访者为亚洲人/英国亚裔时,人类声音与适宜性呈负相关。研究结果为适宜性与声景复合模型之间的关系提供了实证证据,并为影响因素提供了全面的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
期刊最新文献
Ducting of wave-breaking sound by the sea surface bubble layer. Soundscape perception indices (SPIs): Developing context-dependent single value scores of multidimensional soundscape perceptual qualitya). The influence of dialect loss on tone perception: Diminishing voice quality cues in preserved tone contrast. Transcranial ultrasound modeling using the spectral-element method. Noise assessment of multirotor configurations during landing proceduresa).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1