Endovascular treatment of lower limb acute DVT: current trends and future directions.

IF 1.5 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CVIR Endovascular Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s42155-024-00495-x
Francesco Siciliano, Edoardo Ronconi, Tommaso Rossi, Federica Fanelli, Miltiadis Krokidis, Pasqualino Sirignano, Michele Rossi, Marcello Andrea Tipaldi
{"title":"Endovascular treatment of lower limb acute DVT: current trends and future directions.","authors":"Francesco Siciliano, Edoardo Ronconi, Tommaso Rossi, Federica Fanelli, Miltiadis Krokidis, Pasqualino Sirignano, Michele Rossi, Marcello Andrea Tipaldi","doi":"10.1186/s42155-024-00495-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AIM OF THE STUDY: This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and comparative outcomes of endovascular treatments for acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT), including catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT), mechanical thrombectomy, and venous stenting, drawing insights from a diverse range of studies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search identified 33 relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and case reports. Data extraction focused on study design, intervention type, outcome measures, and follow-up duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Catheter-directed thrombolysis demonstrates promising results in enhancing venous patency and reducing post-thrombotic syndrome, with careful patient selection being crucial. Pharmacomechanical and mechanical thrombectomy devices offer immediate and long-term benefits, emphasizing individualized patient care. Venous stenting serves as a crucial adjunctive therapy, particularly in cases of residual venous obstruction, though further research is needed for optimal patient selection and long-term outcomes. Timing and selection of endovascular interventions remain critical considerations, necessitating multidisciplinary approaches and ongoing research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides valuable insights for clinicians and researchers, guiding evidence-based decision-making and shaping future research directions in the dynamic field of endovascular interventions for acute lower limb DVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":"7 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00495-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and comparative outcomes of endovascular treatments for acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT), including catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT), mechanical thrombectomy, and venous stenting, drawing insights from a diverse range of studies.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature search identified 33 relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and case reports. Data extraction focused on study design, intervention type, outcome measures, and follow-up duration.

Results: Catheter-directed thrombolysis demonstrates promising results in enhancing venous patency and reducing post-thrombotic syndrome, with careful patient selection being crucial. Pharmacomechanical and mechanical thrombectomy devices offer immediate and long-term benefits, emphasizing individualized patient care. Venous stenting serves as a crucial adjunctive therapy, particularly in cases of residual venous obstruction, though further research is needed for optimal patient selection and long-term outcomes. Timing and selection of endovascular interventions remain critical considerations, necessitating multidisciplinary approaches and ongoing research.

Conclusion: This review provides valuable insights for clinicians and researchers, guiding evidence-based decision-making and shaping future research directions in the dynamic field of endovascular interventions for acute lower limb DVT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢急性深静脉血栓的血管内治疗:当前趋势和未来方向。
研究目的:本系统综述旨在评估急性下肢深静脉血栓(DVT)血管内治疗的有效性、安全性和比较结果,包括导管引导溶栓(CDT)、药物机械血栓切除术(PMT)、机械血栓切除术和静脉支架置入术,从各种研究中汲取启示:通过全面的文献检索确定了 33 项相关研究,包括随机对照试验、队列研究、系统综述和病例报告。数据提取的重点是研究设计、干预类型、结果测量和随访时间:结果:导管引导溶栓在提高静脉通畅性和减少血栓后综合征方面取得了可喜的成果,但谨慎选择患者至关重要。药物机械和机械血栓清除装置可提供直接和长期的益处,强调对患者的个体化护理。静脉支架植入术是一种重要的辅助疗法,尤其适用于残余静脉阻塞的病例,但如何选择最佳患者和取得长期疗效仍需进一步研究。血管内介入治疗的时机和选择仍是关键因素,需要多学科方法和持续研究:本综述为临床医生和研究人员提供了有价值的见解,为基于证据的决策提供了指导,并为急性下肢深静脉血栓的血管内介入这一充满活力的领域确定了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
"Lobster cage" technique for transcatheter embolization of high-flow arteriovenous fistulas or portosystemic shunts. Efficacy of bronchial artery embolization in hemoptysis: longitudinal studyon survival and recurrence. Clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy for aortoiliac artery chronic total occlusion via the transradial approach. Ultrasound assessment of intimal hyperplasia after plain balloon angioplasty and drug-coated balloon angioplasty of AV access stenosis. Graft and patient survival following angioplasty for post-transplant portal vein stenosis in children under 7 years: a matched case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1