[Doctor, when can I drive? Characterization of driving behavior of orthopedic and trauma surgery patients using a prospective questionnaire study].

Felix Lakomek, Falk Hilsmann, Erik Schiffner, Sebastian Gehrmann, Dominique Schöps, Max Prost, Joachim Windolf, David Latz
{"title":"[Doctor, when can I drive? Characterization of driving behavior of orthopedic and trauma surgery patients using a prospective questionnaire study].","authors":"Felix Lakomek, Falk Hilsmann, Erik Schiffner, Sebastian Gehrmann, Dominique Schöps, Max Prost, Joachim Windolf, David Latz","doi":"10.1007/s00113-024-01502-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individual mobility in road traffic is of high importance in Germany, both individually and socioeconomically; however, diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system in particular can lead to temporary impairments. The aim of this prospective patient survey was to record how patients assessed their driving capability during an injury and the associated immobilization and on what basis the decision on driving capability was made on the part of the patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic questionnaire was used to analyze a total of 100 patients with a diagnosis in orthopedics/trauma surgery and associated joint immobilization. In addition to personal data and the injuries/illnesses, an analysis on risk tolerance was performed and patients were asked about their knowledge regarding driving capability. Finally, it was recorded which patients drove a motor vehicle and for what reasons despite immobilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 40.2% reported knowledge of the applicable laws regarding driving capability and 55.6% considered the treating physician to be responsible regarding the decision on driving capability. The patients who drove a motor vehicle reported higher personal and professional dependence on the motor vehicle (personal: 60.6% vs. 45.7%; professional: 48.5% vs. 36.1%). In the group of patients who drove a motor vehicle during immobilization, overall a fracture was less likely to be the reason for immobilization (33.3% vs. 51.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the patient population rated their knowledge of the law as low and viewed the treating physician as having the majority of the decision-making responsibility regarding driving capability. The patients who drove a motor vehicle during immobilization reported a higher personal as well as professional dependence on driving a motor vehicle. At the same time the injury severity had an influence on the decision, so that patients with fractures were more likely to avoid driving a motor vehicle. Further studies, particularly at the biomechanical level, are needed to ensure a better basis for the physician in making decisions with respect to the driving capability of orthopedic and trauma surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-024-01502-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individual mobility in road traffic is of high importance in Germany, both individually and socioeconomically; however, diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system in particular can lead to temporary impairments. The aim of this prospective patient survey was to record how patients assessed their driving capability during an injury and the associated immobilization and on what basis the decision on driving capability was made on the part of the patients.

Material and methods: A systematic questionnaire was used to analyze a total of 100 patients with a diagnosis in orthopedics/trauma surgery and associated joint immobilization. In addition to personal data and the injuries/illnesses, an analysis on risk tolerance was performed and patients were asked about their knowledge regarding driving capability. Finally, it was recorded which patients drove a motor vehicle and for what reasons despite immobilization.

Results: Overall, 40.2% reported knowledge of the applicable laws regarding driving capability and 55.6% considered the treating physician to be responsible regarding the decision on driving capability. The patients who drove a motor vehicle reported higher personal and professional dependence on the motor vehicle (personal: 60.6% vs. 45.7%; professional: 48.5% vs. 36.1%). In the group of patients who drove a motor vehicle during immobilization, overall a fracture was less likely to be the reason for immobilization (33.3% vs. 51.0%).

Conclusion: Overall, the patient population rated their knowledge of the law as low and viewed the treating physician as having the majority of the decision-making responsibility regarding driving capability. The patients who drove a motor vehicle during immobilization reported a higher personal as well as professional dependence on driving a motor vehicle. At the same time the injury severity had an influence on the decision, so that patients with fractures were more likely to avoid driving a motor vehicle. Further studies, particularly at the biomechanical level, are needed to ensure a better basis for the physician in making decisions with respect to the driving capability of orthopedic and trauma surgery patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[医生,我什么时候能开车?通过前瞻性问卷调查研究了解骨科和创伤手术患者驾驶行为的特点]。
背景:在德国,个人在道路交通中的机动性无论是对个人还是对社会经济都非常重要;然而,肌肉骨骼系统的疾病和损伤尤其会导致暂时性障碍。这项前瞻性患者调查的目的是记录患者在受伤和相关固定期间是如何评估其驾驶能力的,以及患者是根据什么来决定其驾驶能力的:采用系统性问卷调查的方式,对 100 名确诊为骨科/创伤外科并伴有关节固定的患者进行了分析。除了个人数据和伤病情况外,还对风险承受能力进行了分析,并询问了患者对驾驶能力的了解情况。最后,还记录了哪些患者在关节固定的情况下仍驾驶机动车,以及驾驶机动车的原因:总体而言,40.2%的患者表示了解有关驾驶能力的适用法律,55.6%的患者认为主治医生有责任决定患者的驾驶能力。驾驶机动车的患者对机动车的个人和职业依赖性更高(个人:60.6% 对 45.7%;职业:48.5% 对 36.1%)。在固定期间驾驶机动车的患者群体中,骨折成为固定原因的可能性较低(33.3% 对 51.0%):总体而言,患者对法律知识的了解程度较低,并认为主治医生在驾驶能力方面负有大部分决策责任。据报告,在固定期间驾驶机动车的患者对驾驶机动车的个人依赖性和职业依赖性都较高。同时,受伤的严重程度也会对决定产生影响,因此骨折患者更倾向于避免驾驶机动车。需要进一步研究,特别是在生物力学层面,以确保医生在决定骨科和创伤外科患者的驾驶能力时有更好的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Possibilities of the utilization of trauma networks of the German Society for Trauma Surgery using digital solutions]. [Total calcanectomy in osteomyelitis and soft tissue defect with complex secondary reconstruction of the hindfoot : Case report and literature comparison]. [Utilization of registers to create an evidence-based approach in catastrophes and civil defence]. [Consideration and implementation of the elements of hospital mass casualty planning in the hospitals of the TraumaNetworks DGU® : An evaluation within the framework of the development process of the guidelines for clinical disaster medicine in Germany (LeiKliKatMeD) by the EKTC, NIS, AKUT, AUC]. [Pathological fractures of the extremities].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1