Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among staff and consumers at Florida centers for independent living.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Disability and Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101751
Acquel Allen-Mitchell, Nichole E Stetten, Kashif Basaria, Lauren Cox, Nicole M Marlow
{"title":"Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among staff and consumers at Florida centers for independent living.","authors":"Acquel Allen-Mitchell, Nichole E Stetten, Kashif Basaria, Lauren Cox, Nicole M Marlow","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with disabilities (PWD) face health disparities due to barriers that limit their access to essential healthcare services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health disparities among PWD increased as stay-at-home mandates and other safety measures interrupted access to healthcare and social services. Community-based and consumer-driven Centers for Independent Living (CILs) attempt to reduce disparities faced by PWD by providing information and referrals, peer counseling, and advocacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite funding to utilize public health workers to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future crises, the literature currently lacks examinations of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CIL consumers and staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study employed a directed content analysis to evaluate 6 consumer focus groups (N = 35) and 4 staff focus groups (N = 14).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through data analysis, staff themes included Resource Gaps, COVID-19 Concerns, Impact on Independence, Impact on Health, Work Demand Changes, and Work/Life Balance. Among consumers, themes of CIL Service Experiences, CIL Benefits, COVID-19 Concerns of Using CILs, COVID-19 Barriers to Using CILs, Impact on Independence, Impact on Health, Resource Gaps, and Recommendations for CILs were present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the diverse experiences among PWD during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are similarities in the impact of environmental factors on the severity of disability experienced by consumers and staff. This study highlights the benefits of independent community living resource centers and the need to better understand the experiences of PWD to prepare for future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with disabilities (PWD) face health disparities due to barriers that limit their access to essential healthcare services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health disparities among PWD increased as stay-at-home mandates and other safety measures interrupted access to healthcare and social services. Community-based and consumer-driven Centers for Independent Living (CILs) attempt to reduce disparities faced by PWD by providing information and referrals, peer counseling, and advocacy.

Objective: Despite funding to utilize public health workers to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future crises, the literature currently lacks examinations of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CIL consumers and staff.

Methods: This qualitative study employed a directed content analysis to evaluate 6 consumer focus groups (N = 35) and 4 staff focus groups (N = 14).

Results: Through data analysis, staff themes included Resource Gaps, COVID-19 Concerns, Impact on Independence, Impact on Health, Work Demand Changes, and Work/Life Balance. Among consumers, themes of CIL Service Experiences, CIL Benefits, COVID-19 Concerns of Using CILs, COVID-19 Barriers to Using CILs, Impact on Independence, Impact on Health, Resource Gaps, and Recommendations for CILs were present.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the diverse experiences among PWD during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are similarities in the impact of environmental factors on the severity of disability experienced by consumers and staff. This study highlights the benefits of independent community living resource centers and the need to better understand the experiences of PWD to prepare for future pandemics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究 COVID-19 大流行病对佛罗里达独立生活中心员工和消费者的影响。
背景:残疾人(PWD)在获得基本医疗保健服务方面受到各种障碍的限制,因而在健康方面面临着差异。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,由于留守在家的规定和其他安全措施中断了获得医疗保健和社会服务的途径,残疾人的健康差距加大。以社区为基础、由消费者驱动的独立生活中心(CILs)试图通过提供信息和转介、同伴咨询和宣传来减少残疾人面临的差距:尽管有资金利用公共卫生工作人员应对 COVID-19 大流行并为未来的危机做好准备,但目前的文献缺乏对 COVID-19 大流行对 CIL 消费者和工作人员的影响的研究:这项定性研究采用了定向内容分析法,对 6 个消费者焦点小组(35 人)和 4 个员工焦点小组(14 人)进行了评估:通过数据分析,工作人员的主题包括资源缺口、COVID-19 关注点、对独立性的影响、对健康的影响、工作需求变化以及工作与生活的平衡。在消费者中,主题包括 CIL 服务体验、CIL 益处、COVID-19 使用 CIL 的顾虑、COVID-19 使用 CIL 的障碍、对独立性的影响、对健康的影响、资源缺口以及对 CIL 的建议:这项研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,残疾人的经历各不相同。然而,在环境因素对消费者和工作人员所经历的残疾严重程度的影响方面存在相似之处。本研究强调了独立社区生活资源中心的益处,以及更好地了解残疾人经历的必要性,以便为未来的大流行做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
期刊最新文献
Assessing STI and HIV risks among autistic individuals: Implications for healthcare access and intervention. Prognostic comparison between GMFCS and WCI for 5-year risks of 22 relevant health outcomes for adults with cerebral palsy: Expanding the methodological menu for prognostic model research. Internal medicine residents' self-described knowledge of general medical versus disability-focused concerns: An exploratory study. Aging with a disability: A call for research, policy, and practice. Daily physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness in adults with Down syndrome with and without congenital heart disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1