Cenerimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (CARE): an international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Prof Anca D Askanase , Prof David D'Cruz MD , Prof Kenneth Kalunian MD , Prof Joan T Merrill MD , Prof Sandra V Navarra MD , Clélia Cahuzac MD , Peter Cornelisse MSc , Mark J Murphy PhD , Daniel S Strasser PhD , Luba Trokan MD , Ouali Berkani MSN
{"title":"Cenerimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (CARE): an international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial","authors":"Prof Anca D Askanase , Prof David D'Cruz MD , Prof Kenneth Kalunian MD , Prof Joan T Merrill MD , Prof Sandra V Navarra MD , Clélia Cahuzac MD , Peter Cornelisse MSc , Mark J Murphy PhD , Daniel S Strasser PhD , Luba Trokan MD , Ouali Berkani MSN","doi":"10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00246-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a signalling molecule that has an inhibitory role in atherosclerosis, inflammation, cell proliferation, and immunity. Cenerimod is a selective S1P<sub>1</sub> receptor modulator under investigation for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of four doses of cenerimod in adults with moderate-to-severe SLE receiving standard of care background therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CARE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, in adults (aged 18–75 years) with moderate-to-severe SLE (a score of at least 6 out of 105 on the SLE disease activity index-2000, modified to exclude leukopenia [mSLEDAI-2K] score). Participants were recruited from 189 hospitals, specialist centres, and outpatient clinics in 22 countries in Asia Pacific, Latin America, Europe, and the USA. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1), using an interactive response technology via balanced block randomisation (block size of 5) and stratified by oral glucocorticoid dose at randomisation and disease activity at screening, to once-daily oral cenerimod at 0·5 mg, 1·0 mg, 2·0 mg, or 4·0 mg or placebo, in addition to stable background SLE therapy, and followed up for 12 months. After 6 months, participants assigned to cenerimod 4·0 mg were randomly assigned again (1:1) to either cenerimod 2.0 mg or placebo for a further 6 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to month 6 in mSLEDAI-2K score, assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment (full analysis set). To meet the primary endpoint, the doses had to show a significant improvement over placebo, when adjusting for multiplicity, considering the hierarchical testing strategy, per a prespecified plan. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT03742037</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, and is complete.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between Dec 21, 2018, and Aug 25, 2022, 810 patients were screened and 427 were randomly assigned to 0·5 mg (n=85), 1·0 mg (n=85), 2·0 mg (n=86), and 4·0 mg (n=85) cenerimod or placebo (n=86). Median age was 42 years (IQR 33–51), 406 (95%) of 427 participants were women, 21 (5%) were men, and 337 (79%) were White. At month 6, the least squares mean change from baseline in mSLEDAI-2K score was –2·85 (95% CI –3·60 to –2·10) for the placebo group and –3·24 (–3·98 to –2·49; difference <em>vs</em> placebo –0·39 [95% CI –1·45 to 0·68]; p=0·47) for the cenerimod 0·5 mg group, –3·41 (–4·16 to –2·67; difference <em>vs</em> placebo –0·57 [–1·62 to 0·49]; p=0·29) for the 1·0 mg group, –2·84 (–3·58 to –2·09; difference <em>vs</em> placebo 0·01 [–1·05 to 1·08]; p=0·98) for the 2·0 mg group, and –4·04 (–4·79 to –3·28; difference <em>vs</em> placebo –1·19 [–2·25 to –0·12]; p=0·029) for the 4·0 mg group; hence, the primary endpoint was not met. Treatment-emergent adverse events up to 12 months had no clear treatment-related or dose-related pattern across the groups. At month 6, treatment-emergent lymphopenia was reported in one (1%) of 85 patients who received cenerimod 0·5 mg, five (6%) of 85 patients who received 1·0 mg, nine (10%) of 86 patients who received 2·0 mg, 12 (14%) of 84 patients who received 4·0 mg, and no patients who received placebo. Two deaths due to adverse events occurred (both in the cenerimod 1·0 mg group; one due to acute coronary syndrome and the other due to upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage), and were determined to be unrelated to study treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The primary endpoint was not met. Cenerimod was well tolerated over 12 months. Cenerimod 4·0 mg is being investigated for the treatment of SLE in two ongoing phase 3 trials (<span><span>NCT05648500</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT05672576</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Idorsia Pharmaceuticals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48540,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Rheumatology","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages e21-e32"},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665991324002467","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a signalling molecule that has an inhibitory role in atherosclerosis, inflammation, cell proliferation, and immunity. Cenerimod is a selective S1P1 receptor modulator under investigation for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of four doses of cenerimod in adults with moderate-to-severe SLE receiving standard of care background therapy.
Methods
CARE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, in adults (aged 18–75 years) with moderate-to-severe SLE (a score of at least 6 out of 105 on the SLE disease activity index-2000, modified to exclude leukopenia [mSLEDAI-2K] score). Participants were recruited from 189 hospitals, specialist centres, and outpatient clinics in 22 countries in Asia Pacific, Latin America, Europe, and the USA. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1), using an interactive response technology via balanced block randomisation (block size of 5) and stratified by oral glucocorticoid dose at randomisation and disease activity at screening, to once-daily oral cenerimod at 0·5 mg, 1·0 mg, 2·0 mg, or 4·0 mg or placebo, in addition to stable background SLE therapy, and followed up for 12 months. After 6 months, participants assigned to cenerimod 4·0 mg were randomly assigned again (1:1) to either cenerimod 2.0 mg or placebo for a further 6 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to month 6 in mSLEDAI-2K score, assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment (full analysis set). To meet the primary endpoint, the doses had to show a significant improvement over placebo, when adjusting for multiplicity, considering the hierarchical testing strategy, per a prespecified plan. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03742037, and is complete.
Findings
Between Dec 21, 2018, and Aug 25, 2022, 810 patients were screened and 427 were randomly assigned to 0·5 mg (n=85), 1·0 mg (n=85), 2·0 mg (n=86), and 4·0 mg (n=85) cenerimod or placebo (n=86). Median age was 42 years (IQR 33–51), 406 (95%) of 427 participants were women, 21 (5%) were men, and 337 (79%) were White. At month 6, the least squares mean change from baseline in mSLEDAI-2K score was –2·85 (95% CI –3·60 to –2·10) for the placebo group and –3·24 (–3·98 to –2·49; difference vs placebo –0·39 [95% CI –1·45 to 0·68]; p=0·47) for the cenerimod 0·5 mg group, –3·41 (–4·16 to –2·67; difference vs placebo –0·57 [–1·62 to 0·49]; p=0·29) for the 1·0 mg group, –2·84 (–3·58 to –2·09; difference vs placebo 0·01 [–1·05 to 1·08]; p=0·98) for the 2·0 mg group, and –4·04 (–4·79 to –3·28; difference vs placebo –1·19 [–2·25 to –0·12]; p=0·029) for the 4·0 mg group; hence, the primary endpoint was not met. Treatment-emergent adverse events up to 12 months had no clear treatment-related or dose-related pattern across the groups. At month 6, treatment-emergent lymphopenia was reported in one (1%) of 85 patients who received cenerimod 0·5 mg, five (6%) of 85 patients who received 1·0 mg, nine (10%) of 86 patients who received 2·0 mg, 12 (14%) of 84 patients who received 4·0 mg, and no patients who received placebo. Two deaths due to adverse events occurred (both in the cenerimod 1·0 mg group; one due to acute coronary syndrome and the other due to upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage), and were determined to be unrelated to study treatment.
Interpretation
The primary endpoint was not met. Cenerimod was well tolerated over 12 months. Cenerimod 4·0 mg is being investigated for the treatment of SLE in two ongoing phase 3 trials (NCT05648500, NCT05672576).
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Rheumatology, an independent journal, is dedicated to publishing content relevant to rheumatology specialists worldwide. It focuses on studies that advance clinical practice, challenge existing norms, and advocate for changes in health policy. The journal covers clinical research, particularly clinical trials, expert reviews, and thought-provoking commentary on the diagnosis, classification, management, and prevention of rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue diseases, and immune system disorders. Additionally, it publishes high-quality translational studies supported by robust clinical data, prioritizing those that identify potential new therapeutic targets, advance precision medicine efforts, or directly contribute to future clinical trials.
With its strong clinical orientation, The Lancet Rheumatology serves as an independent voice for the rheumatology community, advocating strongly for the enhancement of patients' lives affected by rheumatic diseases worldwide.