Cenerimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (CARE): an international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

IF 15 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Lancet Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00246-7
Prof Anca D Askanase , Prof David D'Cruz MD , Prof Kenneth Kalunian MD , Prof Joan T Merrill MD , Prof Sandra V Navarra MD , Clélia Cahuzac MD , Peter Cornelisse MSc , Mark J Murphy PhD , Daniel S Strasser PhD , Luba Trokan MD , Ouali Berkani MSN
{"title":"Cenerimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, versus placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (CARE): an international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial","authors":"Prof Anca D Askanase ,&nbsp;Prof David D'Cruz MD ,&nbsp;Prof Kenneth Kalunian MD ,&nbsp;Prof Joan T Merrill MD ,&nbsp;Prof Sandra V Navarra MD ,&nbsp;Clélia Cahuzac MD ,&nbsp;Peter Cornelisse MSc ,&nbsp;Mark J Murphy PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel S Strasser PhD ,&nbsp;Luba Trokan MD ,&nbsp;Ouali Berkani MSN","doi":"10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00246-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a signalling molecule that has an inhibitory role in atherosclerosis, inflammation, cell proliferation, and immunity. Cenerimod is a selective S1P<sub>1</sub> receptor modulator under investigation for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of four doses of cenerimod in adults with moderate-to-severe SLE receiving standard of care background therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CARE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, in adults (aged 18–75 years) with moderate-to-severe SLE (a score of at least 6 out of 105 on the SLE disease activity index-2000, modified to exclude leukopenia [mSLEDAI-2K] score). Participants were recruited from 189 hospitals, specialist centres, and outpatient clinics in 22 countries in Asia Pacific, Latin America, Europe, and the USA. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1), using an interactive response technology via balanced block randomisation (block size of 5) and stratified by oral glucocorticoid dose at randomisation and disease activity at screening, to once-daily oral cenerimod at 0·5 mg, 1·0 mg, 2·0 mg, or 4·0 mg or placebo, in addition to stable background SLE therapy, and followed up for 12 months. After 6 months, participants assigned to cenerimod 4·0 mg were randomly assigned again (1:1) to either cenerimod 2.0 mg or placebo for a further 6 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to month 6 in mSLEDAI-2K score, assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment (full analysis set). To meet the primary endpoint, the doses had to show a significant improvement over placebo, when adjusting for multiplicity, considering the hierarchical testing strategy, per a prespecified plan. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT03742037</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, and is complete.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between Dec 21, 2018, and Aug 25, 2022, 810 patients were screened and 427 were randomly assigned to 0·5 mg (n=85), 1·0 mg (n=85), 2·0 mg (n=86), and 4·0 mg (n=85) cenerimod or placebo (n=86). Median age was 42 years (IQR 33–51), 406 (95%) of 427 participants were women, 21 (5%) were men, and 337 (79%) were White. At month 6, the least squares mean change from baseline in mSLEDAI-2K score was –2·85 (95% CI –3·60 to –2·10) for the placebo group and –3·24 (–3·98 to –2·49; difference <em>vs</em> placebo –0·39 [95% CI –1·45 to 0·68]; p=0·47) for the cenerimod 0·5 mg group, –3·41 (–4·16 to –2·67; difference <em>vs</em> placebo –0·57 [–1·62 to 0·49]; p=0·29) for the 1·0 mg group, –2·84 (–3·58 to –2·09; difference <em>vs</em> placebo 0·01 [–1·05 to 1·08]; p=0·98) for the 2·0 mg group, and –4·04 (–4·79 to –3·28; difference <em>vs</em> placebo –1·19 [–2·25 to –0·12]; p=0·029) for the 4·0 mg group; hence, the primary endpoint was not met. Treatment-emergent adverse events up to 12 months had no clear treatment-related or dose-related pattern across the groups. At month 6, treatment-emergent lymphopenia was reported in one (1%) of 85 patients who received cenerimod 0·5 mg, five (6%) of 85 patients who received 1·0 mg, nine (10%) of 86 patients who received 2·0 mg, 12 (14%) of 84 patients who received 4·0 mg, and no patients who received placebo. Two deaths due to adverse events occurred (both in the cenerimod 1·0 mg group; one due to acute coronary syndrome and the other due to upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage), and were determined to be unrelated to study treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The primary endpoint was not met. Cenerimod was well tolerated over 12 months. Cenerimod 4·0 mg is being investigated for the treatment of SLE in two ongoing phase 3 trials (<span><span>NCT05648500</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT05672576</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Idorsia Pharmaceuticals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48540,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Rheumatology","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages e21-e32"},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665991324002467","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a signalling molecule that has an inhibitory role in atherosclerosis, inflammation, cell proliferation, and immunity. Cenerimod is a selective S1P1 receptor modulator under investigation for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of four doses of cenerimod in adults with moderate-to-severe SLE receiving standard of care background therapy.

Methods

CARE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, in adults (aged 18–75 years) with moderate-to-severe SLE (a score of at least 6 out of 105 on the SLE disease activity index-2000, modified to exclude leukopenia [mSLEDAI-2K] score). Participants were recruited from 189 hospitals, specialist centres, and outpatient clinics in 22 countries in Asia Pacific, Latin America, Europe, and the USA. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1), using an interactive response technology via balanced block randomisation (block size of 5) and stratified by oral glucocorticoid dose at randomisation and disease activity at screening, to once-daily oral cenerimod at 0·5 mg, 1·0 mg, 2·0 mg, or 4·0 mg or placebo, in addition to stable background SLE therapy, and followed up for 12 months. After 6 months, participants assigned to cenerimod 4·0 mg were randomly assigned again (1:1) to either cenerimod 2.0 mg or placebo for a further 6 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to month 6 in mSLEDAI-2K score, assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment (full analysis set). To meet the primary endpoint, the doses had to show a significant improvement over placebo, when adjusting for multiplicity, considering the hierarchical testing strategy, per a prespecified plan. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03742037, and is complete.

Findings

Between Dec 21, 2018, and Aug 25, 2022, 810 patients were screened and 427 were randomly assigned to 0·5 mg (n=85), 1·0 mg (n=85), 2·0 mg (n=86), and 4·0 mg (n=85) cenerimod or placebo (n=86). Median age was 42 years (IQR 33–51), 406 (95%) of 427 participants were women, 21 (5%) were men, and 337 (79%) were White. At month 6, the least squares mean change from baseline in mSLEDAI-2K score was –2·85 (95% CI –3·60 to –2·10) for the placebo group and –3·24 (–3·98 to –2·49; difference vs placebo –0·39 [95% CI –1·45 to 0·68]; p=0·47) for the cenerimod 0·5 mg group, –3·41 (–4·16 to –2·67; difference vs placebo –0·57 [–1·62 to 0·49]; p=0·29) for the 1·0 mg group, –2·84 (–3·58 to –2·09; difference vs placebo 0·01 [–1·05 to 1·08]; p=0·98) for the 2·0 mg group, and –4·04 (–4·79 to –3·28; difference vs placebo –1·19 [–2·25 to –0·12]; p=0·029) for the 4·0 mg group; hence, the primary endpoint was not met. Treatment-emergent adverse events up to 12 months had no clear treatment-related or dose-related pattern across the groups. At month 6, treatment-emergent lymphopenia was reported in one (1%) of 85 patients who received cenerimod 0·5 mg, five (6%) of 85 patients who received 1·0 mg, nine (10%) of 86 patients who received 2·0 mg, 12 (14%) of 84 patients who received 4·0 mg, and no patients who received placebo. Two deaths due to adverse events occurred (both in the cenerimod 1·0 mg group; one due to acute coronary syndrome and the other due to upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage), and were determined to be unrelated to study treatment.

Interpretation

The primary endpoint was not met. Cenerimod was well tolerated over 12 months. Cenerimod 4·0 mg is being investigated for the treatment of SLE in two ongoing phase 3 trials (NCT05648500, NCT05672576).

Funding

Idorsia Pharmaceuticals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中重度系统性红斑狼疮(CARE)患者中使用鞘氨醇-1-磷酸受体调节剂西奈莫德与安慰剂:一项国际性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的 2 期试验。
背景:磷脂酰肌苷-1-磷酸(S1P)是一种信号分子,在动脉粥样硬化、炎症、细胞增殖和免疫中具有抑制作用。Cenerimod是一种选择性S1P1受体调节剂,目前正在研究用于治疗系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)。我们旨在确定四种剂量的西奈莫德对接受标准背景疗法的中重度系统性红斑狼疮成人患者的疗效、安全性和耐受性:CARE是一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的2期试验,研究对象为中重度系统性红斑狼疮成人患者(18-75岁)(系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数-2000(SLE disease activity index-2000)满分105分中至少6分,修改后不包括白细胞减少症[mSLEDAI-2K]评分)。参与者来自亚太地区、拉丁美洲、欧洲和美国 22 个国家的 189 家医院、专科中心和门诊诊所。除了稳定的系统性红斑狼疮背景治疗外,研究人员采用交互式响应技术,通过平衡区组随机分配(区组规模为 5),并根据随机分配时的口服糖皮质激素剂量和筛查时的疾病活动性进行分层,将参与者随机分配(1:1:1:1:1:1)到每日一次口服 0-5 毫克、1-0 毫克、2-0 毫克或 4-0 毫克西奈莫德或安慰剂的治疗方案中,并随访 12 个月。6 个月后,分配到西奈莫德 4-0 毫克剂量的参与者再次(1:1)随机分配到西奈莫德 2.0 毫克剂量或安慰剂剂量,继续治疗 6 个月。主要终点是mSLEDAI-2K评分从基线到第6个月的变化,对所有随机分配到治疗方案的参与者进行评估(完整分析集)。要达到主要终点,根据预先规定的计划,在调整多重性后,考虑到分层测试策略,剂量必须比安慰剂有显著改善。安全性分析包括所有接受过至少一剂研究治疗的参与者。该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT03742037,研究结果已完成:2018年12月21日至2022年8月25日期间,共筛选出810名患者,随机分配427名患者接受0-5毫克(n=85)、1-0毫克(n=85)、2-0毫克(n=86)和4-0毫克(n=85)西乃莫德或安慰剂(n=86)治疗。中位年龄为 42 岁(IQR 33-51),427 名参与者中有 406 名(95%)为女性,21 名(5%)为男性,337 名(79%)为白人。第 6 个月时,安慰剂组 mSLEDAI-2K 评分与基线相比的最小二乘法平均变化为-2-85 (95% CI -3-60 to -2-10),西奈莫德 0-5 mg 组为-3-24 (-3-98 to -2-49; difference vs placebo -0-39 [95% CI -1-45 to 0-68]; p=0-47),西奈莫德 1-5 mg 组为-3-41 (-4-16 to -2-67; difference vs placebo -0-57 [-1-62 to 0-49];p=0-29),2-0 mg组为-2-84(-3-58至-2-09;与安慰剂相比差异为0-01 [-1-05 至 1-08];p=0-98),4-0 mg组为-4-04(-4-79至-3-28;与安慰剂相比差异为-1-19 [-2-25 至 -0-12];p=0-029);因此,主要终点未达到。在长达12个月的治疗过程中,各组发生的不良事件没有明显的治疗相关性或剂量相关性。第6个月时,85名接受西奈莫德0-5毫克治疗的患者中有1人(1%)、85名接受1-0毫克治疗的患者中有5人(6%)、86名接受2-0毫克治疗的患者中有9人(10%)、84名接受4-0毫克治疗的患者中有12人(14%)出现治疗突发淋巴细胞减少症,而没有患者接受安慰剂治疗。有两例因不良事件导致的死亡(均发生在西奈莫德1-0毫克组;其中一例死于急性冠状动脉综合征,另一例死于上消化道出血),经确定与研究治疗无关:主要终点未达到。西奈莫德在12个月内的耐受性良好。目前正在进行的两项三期试验(NCT05648500、NCT05672576)正在研究西奈莫德4-0毫克对系统性红斑狼疮的治疗效果:资金来源:Idorsia Pharmaceuticals。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Rheumatology
Lancet Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
34.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: The Lancet Rheumatology, an independent journal, is dedicated to publishing content relevant to rheumatology specialists worldwide. It focuses on studies that advance clinical practice, challenge existing norms, and advocate for changes in health policy. The journal covers clinical research, particularly clinical trials, expert reviews, and thought-provoking commentary on the diagnosis, classification, management, and prevention of rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue diseases, and immune system disorders. Additionally, it publishes high-quality translational studies supported by robust clinical data, prioritizing those that identify potential new therapeutic targets, advance precision medicine efforts, or directly contribute to future clinical trials. With its strong clinical orientation, The Lancet Rheumatology serves as an independent voice for the rheumatology community, advocating strongly for the enhancement of patients' lives affected by rheumatic diseases worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Addition of aerobic physical activity to resistance exercise for hip osteoarthritis (PHOENIX): a randomised comparative effectiveness trial. Addressing evidence gaps in exercise for hip osteoarthritis. Refining strategies for biological and targeted synthetic DMARD initiation in rheumatoid arthritis - Authors' reply. Refining strategies for biological and targeted synthetic DMARD initiation in rheumatoid arthritis. Survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and recently diagnosed early-stage colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1