Mental health plans and policies across the WHO European region.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2024.88
Zoe Guerrero, Anna Kågström, Akmal Aliev, Hana Tomášková, Yongjie Yon, Ledia Lazeri, Marge Reinap, Cassie Redlich, Ana Maria Tijerino Inestroza, Jason Maurer, Petr Winkler
{"title":"Mental health plans and policies across the WHO European region.","authors":"Zoe Guerrero, Anna Kågström, Akmal Aliev, Hana Tomášková, Yongjie Yon, Ledia Lazeri, Marge Reinap, Cassie Redlich, Ana Maria Tijerino Inestroza, Jason Maurer, Petr Winkler","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2024.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence is scarce in terms of tracking the progress of implementation of mental healthcare plans and policies (MHPPs) in Europe, we aimed to map and analyze the content of MHPPs across the WHO European region. We collected data from the WHO Mental Health Atlas 2011, 2017 and 2020 to map the development of MHPPs in the region. We contacted 53 key informants from each country in the European region to triangulate the data from WHO Mental Health Atlases and to obtain access to the national mental health plans and policies. We analyzed the content of MHPPs against the four major objectives of the WHO Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan, and we also focused on the specificity and measurability of their targets. The number and proportion of countries which have their own MHPPs has increased from 30 (52%) to 43 (91%) between 2011 and 2020. MHPPs are generally in line with the WHO policy, aiming to strengthen care in the community, expand mental health promotion and illness prevention activities, improve quality of care, increase intersectoral collaboration, build workforce and system capacity, and improve adherence to human rights. However, specific, and measurable targets as well as a description of concrete steps, responsibilities and funding sources are mostly missing. They often contain very little information systems, evidence and research, and mostly lack information on evaluating the implementation of MHPPs. Progress has been made in terms of the development of MHPPs in the WHO Europe. However, MHPPs are often lacking operationalization and appropriate data collection for evaluation. This is then reflected in missing evaluation plans, which in turn leads to lessons not being learned. To enhance the potential for knowledge generation and demonstration of impact, MHPPs should be more specific and contain measurable targets with allocated responsibilities and funding as well as evaluation plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.88","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence is scarce in terms of tracking the progress of implementation of mental healthcare plans and policies (MHPPs) in Europe, we aimed to map and analyze the content of MHPPs across the WHO European region. We collected data from the WHO Mental Health Atlas 2011, 2017 and 2020 to map the development of MHPPs in the region. We contacted 53 key informants from each country in the European region to triangulate the data from WHO Mental Health Atlases and to obtain access to the national mental health plans and policies. We analyzed the content of MHPPs against the four major objectives of the WHO Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan, and we also focused on the specificity and measurability of their targets. The number and proportion of countries which have their own MHPPs has increased from 30 (52%) to 43 (91%) between 2011 and 2020. MHPPs are generally in line with the WHO policy, aiming to strengthen care in the community, expand mental health promotion and illness prevention activities, improve quality of care, increase intersectoral collaboration, build workforce and system capacity, and improve adherence to human rights. However, specific, and measurable targets as well as a description of concrete steps, responsibilities and funding sources are mostly missing. They often contain very little information systems, evidence and research, and mostly lack information on evaluating the implementation of MHPPs. Progress has been made in terms of the development of MHPPs in the WHO Europe. However, MHPPs are often lacking operationalization and appropriate data collection for evaluation. This is then reflected in missing evaluation plans, which in turn leads to lessons not being learned. To enhance the potential for knowledge generation and demonstration of impact, MHPPs should be more specific and contain measurable targets with allocated responsibilities and funding as well as evaluation plans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界卫生组织欧洲地区的精神健康计划和政策。
在跟踪欧洲精神卫生保健计划和政策(MHPPs)实施进展方面的证据很少,因此我们旨在绘制和分析世卫组织欧洲地区精神卫生保健计划和政策的内容。我们从世界卫生组织 2011 年、2017 年和 2020 年精神卫生地图集中收集了数据,以绘制该地区精神卫生计划和政策的发展图。我们联系了欧洲地区每个国家的 53 名关键信息提供者,以便对世卫组织精神卫生地图集的数据进行三角测量,并获取国家精神卫生计划和政策。我们对照世界卫生组织精神卫生综合行动计划的四大目标,分析了精神卫生计划的内容,并重点关注其目标的具体性和可衡量性。从 2011 年到 2020 年,制定了本国精神卫生计划的国家数量和比例从 30 个(52%)增加到 43 个(91%)。精神健康计划总体上符合世卫组织的政策,旨在加强社区护理、扩大精神健康促进和疾病预防活动、提高护理质量、加强跨部门合作、建设劳动力和系统能力,以及更好地遵守人权。然而,这些计划大多缺乏具体的、可衡量的目标,以及对具体步骤、责任和资金来源的描述。这些计划往往很少包含信息系统、证据和研究,而且大多缺乏对《中期保健计划》实施情况进行评估的信息。世卫组织欧洲办事处在制定 MHPP 方面取得了进展。然而,MHPP 往往缺乏可操作性和适当的评估数据收集。这反映在评估计划的缺失上,进而导致无法吸取经验教训。为了提高产生知识和展示影响的潜力,MHPP 应更加具体,并包含可衡量的目标、分配的责任和资金以及评估计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
期刊最新文献
Mental health plans and policies across the WHO European region. Shared experiences, shared support: A qualitative study on the importance of relatability in interpersonal relationships for youth mental health in South Africa. The Polish version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Short Form (ERQ-S): Psychometric properties, Polish norms and relationships with psychopathology and well-being. Mental health and quality of life following breast cancer diagnosis in patients seen at a tertiary care hospital in Nairobi, Kenya: A qualitative study. Mental health vulnerability in multicultural families: Risk factors among homogenous country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1