Application of Drug-Eluting Stent With Drug-Coated Balloon Strategy for the Endovascular Treatment of Long-Segment Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1177/15266028241292459
Tomofumi Tsukizawa, Masahiko Fujihara, Yuko Yazu
{"title":"Application of Drug-Eluting Stent With Drug-Coated Balloon Strategy for the Endovascular Treatment of Long-Segment Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.","authors":"Tomofumi Tsukizawa, Masahiko Fujihara, Yuko Yazu","doi":"10.1177/15266028241292459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endovascular therapy (EVT) has emerged as a primary approach for managing femoropopliteal artery (FPA) lesions, leveraging drug-eluting stents (DESs), and drug-coated balloons (DCBs), to enhance clinical outcomes. Although a full DES coverage strategy is effective in treating complex lesions, concerns over long-term complications prompt the exploration of alternative strategies. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical result of combination therapy of DES with DCB and compare them with full DES implantation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 131 patients with occlusive FPA lesions treated at our institution between 2019 and 2022. Patients with Rutherford classification stages 2 to 5 who underwent successful EVT were included. The study compared the outcomes of the drug-within-drug (DWD) strategy, ie, combining DES for failed vessel preparation segments and DCB for successful ones, with those of full DES implantation. The primary outcomes were the primary patency rates, and the secondary outcomes included clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rates, restenosis patterns, and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 131 patients initially considered, 118 met the inclusion criteria, with 45 in the DWD group and 73 in the full metal jacket (FMJ) stent group. The DWD group demonstrated equivalent 1-year primary patency rates (85.3%) to the FMJ group (87.9%, p=0.239). Similarly, no significant differences in CD-TLR rates were found between the 2 groups. The restenosis patterns and subsequent treatment strategies were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DWD strategy offers a viable alternative to full DES coverage in treating long-segment FPA lesions, with comparable restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates. This approach may mitigate risks associated with full-length stenting, such as thrombosis, and challenges in repeat revascularizations by tailoring treatment to lesion characteristics. The DWD strategy represents a promising approach for complex FPA lesions, providing a balanced solution that potentially reduces long-term complications while maintaining effective patency and revascularization rates.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>The efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in treating femoropopliteal artery (FPA) lesions has been well demonstrated. However, concerns remain regarding complications such as thrombotic occlusion and aneurysmal degeneration, especially when full stemt coverage of whole lesions is performed. The \"Drug-with-Drug\" (DWD) strategy, which involves implanting DES only at sites with severe dissection or residual stenosis after pre-balloon dilation and using drug coated balloons (DCB) for segments successfully prepared without stenting, has shown comparable outcomes to full stent coverage. Unlike traditional bailout stenting or spot stenting, the DWD approach maximizes the benefits of drug technology and presents a valuable option for treating long-segment FPA lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241292459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241292459","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has emerged as a primary approach for managing femoropopliteal artery (FPA) lesions, leveraging drug-eluting stents (DESs), and drug-coated balloons (DCBs), to enhance clinical outcomes. Although a full DES coverage strategy is effective in treating complex lesions, concerns over long-term complications prompt the exploration of alternative strategies. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical result of combination therapy of DES with DCB and compare them with full DES implantation.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 131 patients with occlusive FPA lesions treated at our institution between 2019 and 2022. Patients with Rutherford classification stages 2 to 5 who underwent successful EVT were included. The study compared the outcomes of the drug-within-drug (DWD) strategy, ie, combining DES for failed vessel preparation segments and DCB for successful ones, with those of full DES implantation. The primary outcomes were the primary patency rates, and the secondary outcomes included clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rates, restenosis patterns, and survival outcomes.

Results: Of the 131 patients initially considered, 118 met the inclusion criteria, with 45 in the DWD group and 73 in the full metal jacket (FMJ) stent group. The DWD group demonstrated equivalent 1-year primary patency rates (85.3%) to the FMJ group (87.9%, p=0.239). Similarly, no significant differences in CD-TLR rates were found between the 2 groups. The restenosis patterns and subsequent treatment strategies were not significantly different.

Conclusion: The DWD strategy offers a viable alternative to full DES coverage in treating long-segment FPA lesions, with comparable restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates. This approach may mitigate risks associated with full-length stenting, such as thrombosis, and challenges in repeat revascularizations by tailoring treatment to lesion characteristics. The DWD strategy represents a promising approach for complex FPA lesions, providing a balanced solution that potentially reduces long-term complications while maintaining effective patency and revascularization rates.

Clinical impact: The efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in treating femoropopliteal artery (FPA) lesions has been well demonstrated. However, concerns remain regarding complications such as thrombotic occlusion and aneurysmal degeneration, especially when full stemt coverage of whole lesions is performed. The "Drug-with-Drug" (DWD) strategy, which involves implanting DES only at sites with severe dissection or residual stenosis after pre-balloon dilation and using drug coated balloons (DCB) for segments successfully prepared without stenting, has shown comparable outcomes to full stent coverage. Unlike traditional bailout stenting or spot stenting, the DWD approach maximizes the benefits of drug technology and presents a valuable option for treating long-segment FPA lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用药物洗脱支架和药物涂层球囊策略进行长段股腘动脉疾病的血管内治疗
目的:血管内治疗(EVT)已成为治疗股网膜动脉(FPA)病变的主要方法,它利用药物洗脱支架(DES)和药物涂层球囊(DCB)来提高临床疗效。虽然全 DES 覆盖策略能有效治疗复杂病变,但对长期并发症的担忧促使人们探索其他策略。本研究旨在探讨DES与DCB联合治疗的临床效果,并与全DES植入术进行比较:这项回顾性单中心研究分析了2019年至2022年间在我院接受治疗的131例闭塞性FPA病变患者。研究纳入了卢瑟福分级2至5期、成功接受EVT治疗的患者。研究比较了药中药(DWD)策略(即对失败的血管准备区段使用DES,对成功的血管准备区段使用DCB)与完全植入DES的结果。主要结果是主要通畅率,次要结果包括临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(CD-TLR)率、再狭窄模式和生存结果:在初步考虑的131名患者中,118人符合纳入标准,其中DWD组45人,全金属外壳(FMJ)支架组73人。DWD 组的 1 年初次通畅率(85.3%)与 FMJ 组(87.9%,P=0.239)相当。同样,两组的 CD-TLR 率也无明显差异。再狭窄模式和后续治疗策略也无明显差异:DWD策略为治疗长段FPA病变提供了全DES覆盖的可行替代方案,其再狭窄率和靶病变血运重建(TLR)率相当。这种方法可以减轻全长支架植入术的相关风险,如血栓形成,并通过根据病变特点进行治疗,减少重复血管再通的挑战。DWD策略是治疗复杂FPA病变的一种很有前景的方法,它提供了一种平衡的解决方案,在保持有效通畅率和血管再通率的同时,有可能减少长期并发症:药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗股网膜动脉(FPA)病变的疗效已得到充分证明。临床影响:药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗股腘动脉(FPA)病变的疗效已得到充分证明,但血栓性闭塞和动脉瘤变性等并发症仍令人担忧,尤其是当支架覆盖整个病变时。带药"(DWD)策略是指仅在球囊前扩张后有严重夹层或残余狭窄的部位植入 DES,并在不进行支架置入的情况下使用药物涂层球囊(DCB)对成功准备好的病变区段进行治疗。与传统的救助支架或定点支架不同,DWD方法最大限度地发挥了药物技术的优势,是治疗长段FPA病变的重要选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
The Value of Different Systemic Inflammatory Response Indicators in the Long-term Prognosis of Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. Effect of Statins on the Prognosis After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection. Potential of D-Dimer as a Tool to Rule Out Sac Expansion in Patients With Persistent Type 2 Endoleaks After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Long-Term Outcomes and Late Complications of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using the GORE TAG or Conformable GORE TAG. Long-term Outcomes of the AcoArt II-BTK Trial: Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1