Nikhil Teja, Daniel Gottlieb, Brian Shiner, Talya Peltzman, Bradley V Watts
{"title":"Geographic Variation in Receipt of Electroconvulsive Therapy Among US Department of Veterans Affairs Patients.","authors":"Nikhil Teja, Daniel Gottlieb, Brian Shiner, Talya Peltzman, Bradley V Watts","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to characterize geographic variation in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) receipt across the United States (US) Veterans Administration (VA) healthcare system and explore potential explanatory variables.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>ECT is a highly effective and rapidly acting treatment for multiple mental disorders. However, there may be geographic disparities in access to ECT across the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of all VA patients from 2003 to 2019 to describe rates of ECT within previously defined mental health referral regions (MHRRs). We investigated differences between the population that received ECT and other patients with a mental health condition severe enough to warrant inpatient hospitalization. We analyzed crude as well as age, sex, race, and ethnicity-adjusted ECT rates and explored potential explanatory variables. We compared MHRRs in the highest and lowest tertiles of ECT receipt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of ECT receipt among VA patients was 1.7 individuals per 10,000 (SD = 1.6) annually. Among 115 MHRRs, the rate ranged from a minimum of 0 (effectively no utilization in some areas) to a maximum of 8.9. Regression analysis revealed few significant explanatory variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant geographic variation in ECT receipt among VA patients that is not well explained by population characteristics and may be indicative of suboptimal treatment for several mental health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study is to characterize geographic variation in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) receipt across the United States (US) Veterans Administration (VA) healthcare system and explore potential explanatory variables.
Background: ECT is a highly effective and rapidly acting treatment for multiple mental disorders. However, there may be geographic disparities in access to ECT across the US.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of all VA patients from 2003 to 2019 to describe rates of ECT within previously defined mental health referral regions (MHRRs). We investigated differences between the population that received ECT and other patients with a mental health condition severe enough to warrant inpatient hospitalization. We analyzed crude as well as age, sex, race, and ethnicity-adjusted ECT rates and explored potential explanatory variables. We compared MHRRs in the highest and lowest tertiles of ECT receipt.
Results: The rate of ECT receipt among VA patients was 1.7 individuals per 10,000 (SD = 1.6) annually. Among 115 MHRRs, the rate ranged from a minimum of 0 (effectively no utilization in some areas) to a maximum of 8.9. Regression analysis revealed few significant explanatory variables.
Conclusions: There is significant geographic variation in ECT receipt among VA patients that is not well explained by population characteristics and may be indicative of suboptimal treatment for several mental health conditions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.