Beyond techno-solutionism: Towards critical perspectives in environmental education and digital technology. A critical-hermeneutic review

Haley Perkins
{"title":"Beyond techno-solutionism: Towards critical perspectives in environmental education and digital technology. A critical-hermeneutic review","authors":"Haley Perkins","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As ecological changes escalate and digital technologies continue to entangle themselves into children's lives, there is a need to critically explore the intersection of education, digital technologies, and environmental concerns. This paper aims to uncover underlying assumptions and metanarratives in current scholarship at the intersection of Environmental Education (EE), technology, and Child-Computer Interaction (CCI) to broaden perspectives and foster transformative futures. A decolonial-informed critical hermeneutic literature review of 79 papers explores EE's relationship with digital technology and CCI. Thematic analysis and iterative search cycles reveal a hegemonic discourse centred on anthropocentrism, technological solutionism, and behaviour change in children, predominantly driven by economic priorities in the Global North. Non-hegemonic perspectives (particularly those from the Global South) emphasise critical perspectives on digital technology development and sustainability discourse. These perspectives advocate for non-dualistic understandings of human-nature-technology relationships such as those informed by relationally-based Indigenous knowledges, new materialisms, arts-based pedagogies, and ecopedagogies. This review has implications for EE and the CCI communities alike. Findings suggest that researchers might reconsider prioritising techno-pedagogical sustainability solutions and shift efforts first towards transforming the underlying ways of knowing and being that drive current education and technology narratives and design. By critically addressing these onto-epistemological orientations, we might stand a chance for a more sustainable and ecologically responsible future for today's children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868924000746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As ecological changes escalate and digital technologies continue to entangle themselves into children's lives, there is a need to critically explore the intersection of education, digital technologies, and environmental concerns. This paper aims to uncover underlying assumptions and metanarratives in current scholarship at the intersection of Environmental Education (EE), technology, and Child-Computer Interaction (CCI) to broaden perspectives and foster transformative futures. A decolonial-informed critical hermeneutic literature review of 79 papers explores EE's relationship with digital technology and CCI. Thematic analysis and iterative search cycles reveal a hegemonic discourse centred on anthropocentrism, technological solutionism, and behaviour change in children, predominantly driven by economic priorities in the Global North. Non-hegemonic perspectives (particularly those from the Global South) emphasise critical perspectives on digital technology development and sustainability discourse. These perspectives advocate for non-dualistic understandings of human-nature-technology relationships such as those informed by relationally-based Indigenous knowledges, new materialisms, arts-based pedagogies, and ecopedagogies. This review has implications for EE and the CCI communities alike. Findings suggest that researchers might reconsider prioritising techno-pedagogical sustainability solutions and shift efforts first towards transforming the underlying ways of knowing and being that drive current education and technology narratives and design. By critically addressing these onto-epistemological orientations, we might stand a chance for a more sustainable and ecologically responsible future for today's children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越技术解决主义:迈向环境教育和数字技术的批判性视角。批判性神学评论
随着生态变化的升级和数字技术不断融入儿童的生活,有必要批判性地探索教育、数字技术和环境问题的交叉点。本文旨在揭示当前学术界在环境教育(EE)、技术和儿童与计算机互动(CCI)交叉领域的基本假设和元叙事,以拓宽视野,促进未来的变革。对 79 篇论文进行了非殖民地批判诠释学文献综述,探讨了环境教育与数字技术和儿童计算机互动的关系。主题分析和迭代搜索循环揭示了以人类中心主义、技术解决方案主义和儿童行为改变为中心的霸权话语,这些话语主要由全球北方的经济优先事项所驱动。非霸权视角(尤其是来自全球南部的视角)强调对数字技术发展和可持续性话语的批判性视角。这些观点主张对人类-自然-技术关系进行非二元对立的理解,如基于关系的土著知识、新唯物主义、基于艺术的教学法和生态教学法。本综述对环境教育界和 CCI 界都有影响。研究结果表明,研究人员可以重新考虑将技术教育学可持续性解决方案作为优先事项,并将工作重点首先转移到改变推动当前教育和技术叙事与设计的基本认知和存在方式上。通过批判性地解决这些认识论取向,我们或许有机会为今天的孩子们创造一个更可持续、对生态更负责任的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Beyond techno-solutionism: Towards critical perspectives in environmental education and digital technology. A critical-hermeneutic review Expanding digital literacies beyond the digital: Infusing computational thinking into unplugged pedagogical tools - Two case studies from mathematics education How can AR-enhanced books support early readers? Exploring literacy development through AR design principles Examining children's perceptions of AI-enabled interactive media characters Designing for Teen Mental Health: An exploration of the co-design of virtual reality in the public library setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1