{"title":"Finer-grained reductions in fine-grained hardness of approximation","authors":"Elie Abboud , Noga Ron-Zewi","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2024.114976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate the relation between <em>δ</em> and <em>ϵ</em> required for obtaining a <span><math><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>+</mo><mi>δ</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation in time <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>ϵ</mi></mrow></msup></math></span> for closest pair problems under various distance metrics, and for other related problems in fine-grained complexity.</div><div>Specifically, our main result shows that if it is impossible to (exactly) solve the (bichromatic) inner product (IP) problem for vectors of dimension <span><math><mi>c</mi><mi>log</mi><mo></mo><mi>N</mi></math></span> in time <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>ϵ</mi></mrow></msup></math></span>, then there is no <span><math><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>+</mo><mi>δ</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation algorithm for (bichromatic) Euclidean Closest Pair running in time <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn><mi>ϵ</mi></mrow></msup></math></span>, where <span><math><mi>δ</mi><mo>≈</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>ϵ</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>c</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> (where ≈ hides polylog factors). This improves on the prior result due to Chen and Williams (SODA 2019) which gave a smaller polynomial dependence of <em>δ</em> on <em>ϵ</em>, on the order of <span><math><mi>δ</mi><mo>≈</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>ϵ</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>c</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>6</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>. Our result implies in turn that no <span><math><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>+</mo><mi>δ</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>-approximation algorithm exists for Euclidean closest pair for <span><math><mi>δ</mi><mo>≈</mo><msup><mrow><mi>ϵ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>, unless an algorithmic improvement for IP is obtained. This in turn is very close to the approximation guarantee of <span><math><mi>δ</mi><mo>≈</mo><msup><mrow><mi>ϵ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> for Euclidean closest pair, given by the best known algorithm of Almam, Chan, and Williams (FOCS 2016). By known reductions, a similar result follows for a host of other related problems in fine-grained hardness of approximation.</div><div>Our reduction combines the hardness of approximation framework of Chen and Williams, together with an MA communication protocol for IP over a small alphabet, that is inspired by the MA protocol of Chen (Theory of Computing, 2020).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49438,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Computer Science","volume":"1026 ","pages":"Article 114976"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397524005930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigate the relation between δ and ϵ required for obtaining a -approximation in time for closest pair problems under various distance metrics, and for other related problems in fine-grained complexity.
Specifically, our main result shows that if it is impossible to (exactly) solve the (bichromatic) inner product (IP) problem for vectors of dimension in time , then there is no -approximation algorithm for (bichromatic) Euclidean Closest Pair running in time , where (where ≈ hides polylog factors). This improves on the prior result due to Chen and Williams (SODA 2019) which gave a smaller polynomial dependence of δ on ϵ, on the order of . Our result implies in turn that no -approximation algorithm exists for Euclidean closest pair for , unless an algorithmic improvement for IP is obtained. This in turn is very close to the approximation guarantee of for Euclidean closest pair, given by the best known algorithm of Almam, Chan, and Williams (FOCS 2016). By known reductions, a similar result follows for a host of other related problems in fine-grained hardness of approximation.
Our reduction combines the hardness of approximation framework of Chen and Williams, together with an MA communication protocol for IP over a small alphabet, that is inspired by the MA protocol of Chen (Theory of Computing, 2020).
期刊介绍:
Theoretical Computer Science is mathematical and abstract in spirit, but it derives its motivation from practical and everyday computation. Its aim is to understand the nature of computation and, as a consequence of this understanding, provide more efficient methodologies. All papers introducing or studying mathematical, logic and formal concepts and methods are welcome, provided that their motivation is clearly drawn from the field of computing.