Idiographic learning analytics: Mapping of the ethical issues

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102599
Kamila Misiejuk , Jeanette Samuelsen , Rogers Kaliisa , Paul Prinsloo
{"title":"Idiographic learning analytics: Mapping of the ethical issues","authors":"Kamila Misiejuk ,&nbsp;Jeanette Samuelsen ,&nbsp;Rogers Kaliisa ,&nbsp;Paul Prinsloo","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the ethical implications of idiographic learning analytics (LA), a personalized approach to learning where individual student data serves as the primary reference frame for analysis. By focusing on the unique characteristics of each learner, idiographic LA offers tailored educational experiences that could potentially enhance learning outcomes. This personalized approach offers new possibilities to mitigate common ethical challenges in nomothetic LA. This study explores the ethical dimensions of idiographic LA by integrating theories and lessons learned from implementing idiographic approaches in the fields of quantified self, recommender systems, intelligent tutoring systems, and artificial intelligence personalization. We employ a consequentialist ethical perspective to assess the implications of idiographic practices in education, highlighting potential benefits and risks and mapping the main ethical issues differentiating idiographic LA from nomothetic LA. The paper provides several points of consideration to ensure ethical implementations of idiographic LA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102599"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001924","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the ethical implications of idiographic learning analytics (LA), a personalized approach to learning where individual student data serves as the primary reference frame for analysis. By focusing on the unique characteristics of each learner, idiographic LA offers tailored educational experiences that could potentially enhance learning outcomes. This personalized approach offers new possibilities to mitigate common ethical challenges in nomothetic LA. This study explores the ethical dimensions of idiographic LA by integrating theories and lessons learned from implementing idiographic approaches in the fields of quantified self, recommender systems, intelligent tutoring systems, and artificial intelligence personalization. We employ a consequentialist ethical perspective to assess the implications of idiographic practices in education, highlighting potential benefits and risks and mapping the main ethical issues differentiating idiographic LA from nomothetic LA. The paper provides several points of consideration to ensure ethical implementations of idiographic LA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成语学习分析:伦理问题图谱
特异性学习分析(idiographic learning analytics,LA)是一种个性化学习方法,以学生个人数据为主要分析参考框架,本文探讨了特异性学习分析的伦理意义。通过关注每个学习者的独特特征,特异性学习分析提供了量身定制的教育体验,从而有可能提高学习效果。这种个性化的方法为减轻提名法中常见的伦理挑战提供了新的可能性。本研究通过整合量化自我、推荐系统、智能辅导系统和人工智能个性化等领域实施特异性方法的理论和经验教训,探索特异性学习方法的伦理层面。我们采用了后果主义伦理视角来评估教育领域特异性实践的影响,强调了潜在的益处和风险,并描绘了特异性学习方法与提名式学习方法之间的主要伦理问题。本文提供了几个考虑要点,以确保以符合伦理的方式实施特异性语言学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
The structure of adult thinking: A network approach to (meta)cognitive processing Ink and pixels: Impact of highlighting and reading self-efficacy on adolescents' cognitive load, epistemic emotions, and text comprehension Students' study activities before and after exam deadlines as predictors of performance in STEM courses: A multi-source data analysis The relationship between positive and painful emotions and cognitive load during an algebra learning task Idiographic learning analytics: Mapping of the ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1