The societal impact of meaningful social interactions during online focus groups

Connor Smith
{"title":"The societal impact of meaningful social interactions during online focus groups","authors":"Connor Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.socimp.2024.100096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Against a backdrop of increasing levels of discontent and division reported in democratic societies, meaningful social interactions (especially between strangers) are clearly important to study. Drawing on observations during previous research projects, this article explores whether and how online focus groups (OFGs) can be leveraged to facilitate meaningful social interactions between unfamiliar interaction partners, and the extent to which these interactions have the potential to create societal impact. Our findings suggest that OFGs can facilitate a combination of “emotional”, “informational”, and “tangible” impacts for participants, helping to make social interactions meaningful. Meanwhile, these “individual impacts” could translate to “societal impacts” by empowering people to better participate (and participate better) in the public sphere. This outcome could be accelerated if individuals share newly acquired knowledge onwards with their community, generating a positive feedback loop of further meaningful social interactions. Our findings imply that researchers should strive to ensure that qualitative social research delivers direct value to the participants who take part, separate from the potential (thematic) value it has for the academic(s) involved. This ambition could be supported by academic funding frameworks that recognize “direct value for participants” as a desirable (and assessed) criterion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101167,"journal":{"name":"Societal Impacts","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697724000614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against a backdrop of increasing levels of discontent and division reported in democratic societies, meaningful social interactions (especially between strangers) are clearly important to study. Drawing on observations during previous research projects, this article explores whether and how online focus groups (OFGs) can be leveraged to facilitate meaningful social interactions between unfamiliar interaction partners, and the extent to which these interactions have the potential to create societal impact. Our findings suggest that OFGs can facilitate a combination of “emotional”, “informational”, and “tangible” impacts for participants, helping to make social interactions meaningful. Meanwhile, these “individual impacts” could translate to “societal impacts” by empowering people to better participate (and participate better) in the public sphere. This outcome could be accelerated if individuals share newly acquired knowledge onwards with their community, generating a positive feedback loop of further meaningful social interactions. Our findings imply that researchers should strive to ensure that qualitative social research delivers direct value to the participants who take part, separate from the potential (thematic) value it has for the academic(s) involved. This ambition could be supported by academic funding frameworks that recognize “direct value for participants” as a desirable (and assessed) criterion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线焦点小组期间有意义的社交互动的社会影响
据报道,民主社会中的不满情绪和分裂现象日益严重,在此背景下,有意义的社会互动(尤其是陌生人之间的互动)显然具有重要的研究意义。本文借鉴以往研究项目中的观察结果,探讨是否以及如何利用在线焦点小组(OFGs)来促进陌生互动伙伴之间有意义的社会互动,以及这些互动在多大程度上有可能产生社会影响。我们的研究结果表明,焦点小组可以为参与者带来 "情感"、"信息 "和 "有形 "的综合影响,有助于使社会互动变得更有意义。同时,这些 "个人影响 "可以转化为 "社会影响",使人们有能力更好地参与(和更好地参与)公共领域。如果个人能够与社区分享新获得的知识,从而形成一个积极的反馈循环,进一步促进有意义的社会互动,那么这一结果就会加速实现。我们的研究结果表明,研究人员应努力确保定性社会研究为参与研究的人员带来直接价值,而不是为相关学者带来潜在的(专题)价值。学术资助框架可以将 "对参与者的直接价值 "作为一个理想的(和评估的)标准,从而支持这一雄心壮志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the economic and environmental benefits of Colombo wetlands in urban planning with nature-based solutions Promoting lung cancer screening and smoking cessation among minority population: Methodologies and societal impacts Conflict management instruments for the energy transition Green approaches to heavy metal removal from wastewater: Microalgae solutions in a circular economy framework Societal impact of micro-exercise for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The case of Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1