Evaluating flue gas geo-sequestration and EOR in fractured reservoirs through simulated synergistic reservoir characteristics and injection kinetics

Mehdi Nassabeh , Zhenjiang You , Alireza Keshavarz , Stefan Iglauer
{"title":"Evaluating flue gas geo-sequestration and EOR in fractured reservoirs through simulated synergistic reservoir characteristics and injection kinetics","authors":"Mehdi Nassabeh ,&nbsp;Zhenjiang You ,&nbsp;Alireza Keshavarz ,&nbsp;Stefan Iglauer","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global reliance on hydrocarbon resources and fossil fuels has resulted in a significant surge in carbon dioxide emissions, necessitating urgent measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Integrating CO<sub>2</sub> storage with enhanced oil recovery (EOR) presents a promising solution for reducing emissions and enhancing oil recovery by sequestering CO<sub>2</sub> within oil reservoirs, especially in fractured carbonate reservoirs. The research utilized the Eclipse simulator to model different gas injection scenarios in a crude oil reservoir, focusing on assessing the effectiveness of CO<sub>2</sub> and flue gas geo-sequestration and EOR, performing sensitivity analyses on reservoir characteristics, and evaluating the impact of varying injection rates on gas storage capacity and oil recovery factor. The findings demonstrated a superior capacity to store flue gas (150 MMSCF) in comparison to CO<sub>2</sub> (85 MMSCF) and flue gas injection demonstrated better reservoir pressure maintenance than CO<sub>2</sub> injection, while CO<sub>2</sub> injection resulted in a higher oil recovery factor of 52% compared to flue gas injection at 36%. Additionally, analysis of reservoir characteristics in gas storage revealed that, an augmentation in reservoir porosity, permeability, and injection rate substantiated an increase in gas storage capacity for both CO<sub>2</sub> and flue gas injection. Except for CO<sub>2</sub> storage, which displayed a normal distribution trend in the permeability analysis. Additionally, it was elucidated that higher reservoir pressure and temperature in flue gas injection resulted in a reduction of gas storage capacity, while these variables exhibited relative stability in the context of CO<sub>2</sub> injection. The scrutiny of gas storage in reservoir characteristics unveiled substantial alterations in porosity and injection rate, signifying their pivotal roles in influencing gas storage capacity. In the EOR study, heightened reservoir pressure, temperature, permeability, and injection rate collectively contributed to an amplified oil recovery for both flue gas and CO<sub>2</sub>, except CO<sub>2</sub> injection demonstrated a normal distribution trend in oil recovery within the permeability analysis. Conversely, higher porosity was associated with a decrease in oil recovery. The findings of this research provide valuable insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of employing flue gas geo-sequestration and EOR in fractured carbonate reservoirs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 213521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891024008911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global reliance on hydrocarbon resources and fossil fuels has resulted in a significant surge in carbon dioxide emissions, necessitating urgent measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Integrating CO2 storage with enhanced oil recovery (EOR) presents a promising solution for reducing emissions and enhancing oil recovery by sequestering CO2 within oil reservoirs, especially in fractured carbonate reservoirs. The research utilized the Eclipse simulator to model different gas injection scenarios in a crude oil reservoir, focusing on assessing the effectiveness of CO2 and flue gas geo-sequestration and EOR, performing sensitivity analyses on reservoir characteristics, and evaluating the impact of varying injection rates on gas storage capacity and oil recovery factor. The findings demonstrated a superior capacity to store flue gas (150 MMSCF) in comparison to CO2 (85 MMSCF) and flue gas injection demonstrated better reservoir pressure maintenance than CO2 injection, while CO2 injection resulted in a higher oil recovery factor of 52% compared to flue gas injection at 36%. Additionally, analysis of reservoir characteristics in gas storage revealed that, an augmentation in reservoir porosity, permeability, and injection rate substantiated an increase in gas storage capacity for both CO2 and flue gas injection. Except for CO2 storage, which displayed a normal distribution trend in the permeability analysis. Additionally, it was elucidated that higher reservoir pressure and temperature in flue gas injection resulted in a reduction of gas storage capacity, while these variables exhibited relative stability in the context of CO2 injection. The scrutiny of gas storage in reservoir characteristics unveiled substantial alterations in porosity and injection rate, signifying their pivotal roles in influencing gas storage capacity. In the EOR study, heightened reservoir pressure, temperature, permeability, and injection rate collectively contributed to an amplified oil recovery for both flue gas and CO2, except CO2 injection demonstrated a normal distribution trend in oil recovery within the permeability analysis. Conversely, higher porosity was associated with a decrease in oil recovery. The findings of this research provide valuable insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of employing flue gas geo-sequestration and EOR in fractured carbonate reservoirs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过模拟协同储层特征和注入动力学评估裂缝储层中的烟气地质封存和 EOR
全球对碳氢化合物资源和化石燃料的依赖导致二氧化碳排放量激增,因此必须采取紧急措施减少温室气体排放。将二氧化碳封存与提高石油采收率(EOR)相结合,是通过在油藏(尤其是裂缝碳酸盐岩油藏)中封存二氧化碳来减少排放和提高石油采收率的一种前景广阔的解决方案。研究利用 Eclipse 模拟器对原油储层中的不同注气方案进行建模,重点评估二氧化碳和烟道气地质封存与 EOR 的有效性,对储层特征进行敏感性分析,并评估不同注入率对气体封存能力和石油采收率的影响。研究结果表明,与二氧化碳(85 兆立方英尺)相比,烟道气(150 兆立方英尺)的存储能力更强;与二氧化碳注入相比,烟道气注入能更好地保持储层压力;与烟道气注入相比,二氧化碳注入的石油采收率为 52%,而烟道气注入的石油采收率为 36%。此外,对储气库储层特征的分析表明,储层孔隙度、渗透率和注入率的增加证实了二氧化碳和烟道气注入储气库储气能力的提高。但二氧化碳储层除外,其渗透率分析显示出正态分布趋势。此外,研究还发现,在注入烟道气时,较高的储层压力和温度会导致储气能力下降,而在注入二氧化碳时,这些变量则表现出相对稳定。对储层储气特性的研究揭示了孔隙度和注入率的重大变化,表明它们在影响储气能力方面起着关键作用。在 EOR 研究中,储层压力、温度、渗透率和注入率的提高共同导致了烟道气和二氧化碳采油率的提高,但在渗透率分析中,二氧化碳注入的采油率呈现正态分布趋势。相反,孔隙度越高,采油率越低。这项研究的结果为在裂缝碳酸盐岩储层中采用烟气地质封存和 EOR 的可行性和有效性提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanism of microfracture propagation under mechanical–chemical coupling conditions considering dissolution Carbon steel pipeline CO2 erosion-corrosion damage prediction model and numerical simulation research Propped fracture conductivity in shale oil reservoirs: Prediction model and influencing factors Numerical study of using dual sources constructed via deconvolution to suppress the collar waves in acoustic logging while drilling Numerical investigation on heat extraction performance of supercritical CO2 in depleted oil and gas reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1