Evaluating and reporting LET and RBE-weighted dose in proton therapy for glioma – The Dutch approach

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110653
Dirk Wagenaar , Steven J.M. Habraken , Ilaria Rinaldi , Daniëlle B.P. Eekers , Miranda Kramer , Jaap P.M. Jaspers , Dik van Gent , Lara Barazzuol , Yvonne L.B. Klaver , Jaap Zindler , Ida Coremans , Inge Compter , Daniel Scandurra , Hiska L. van der Weide , Stefan Both , Mischa Hoogeman , Mirko Unipan , Alejandra Méndez Romero
{"title":"Evaluating and reporting LET and RBE-weighted dose in proton therapy for glioma – The Dutch approach","authors":"Dirk Wagenaar ,&nbsp;Steven J.M. Habraken ,&nbsp;Ilaria Rinaldi ,&nbsp;Daniëlle B.P. Eekers ,&nbsp;Miranda Kramer ,&nbsp;Jaap P.M. Jaspers ,&nbsp;Dik van Gent ,&nbsp;Lara Barazzuol ,&nbsp;Yvonne L.B. Klaver ,&nbsp;Jaap Zindler ,&nbsp;Ida Coremans ,&nbsp;Inge Compter ,&nbsp;Daniel Scandurra ,&nbsp;Hiska L. van der Weide ,&nbsp;Stefan Both ,&nbsp;Mischa Hoogeman ,&nbsp;Mirko Unipan ,&nbsp;Alejandra Méndez Romero","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>With proton therapy, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) accounts for increased DNA damage caused by higher linear energy transfer (LET) compared to photons. However, the LET and hence the RBE varies along the proton range, particularly at the Bragg peak, introducing challenges in proton treatment planning for brain tumors. The aim of this paper is to standardize evaluating and reporting LET and RBE in proton therapy for patients with grade 2 and 3 IDH mutant gliomas among the Dutch proton therapy centers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A working group, comprising experts from three Dutch proton therapy centers, conducted nine meetings between 2020 and 2023. A joint literature review supported the standardized evaluation and reporting of LET and RBE. Questionnaires sent out to the three Dutch proton centers in 2020 and 2023 provided input for discussions on clinical practices. Three clinical examples were chosen to illustrate the application of the recommended methodology in treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following the literature review, a guideline on evaluation and reporting using the dose averaged LET (LET<sub>d</sub>) of primary and secondary protons calculated in water normalized to unit density was established. The McNamara variable RBE model with an α/β value of 2 Gy was selected for reporting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study presents a harmonization of approaches to evaluating and reporting LET and variable RBE in a guideline for the three Dutch proton therapy centers, providing clarity for future clinical interpretation. Having chosen a single variable RBE model offers practicality, although its accuracy remains a topic of ongoing research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110653"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024043159","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

With proton therapy, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) accounts for increased DNA damage caused by higher linear energy transfer (LET) compared to photons. However, the LET and hence the RBE varies along the proton range, particularly at the Bragg peak, introducing challenges in proton treatment planning for brain tumors. The aim of this paper is to standardize evaluating and reporting LET and RBE in proton therapy for patients with grade 2 and 3 IDH mutant gliomas among the Dutch proton therapy centers.

Materials and methods

A working group, comprising experts from three Dutch proton therapy centers, conducted nine meetings between 2020 and 2023. A joint literature review supported the standardized evaluation and reporting of LET and RBE. Questionnaires sent out to the three Dutch proton centers in 2020 and 2023 provided input for discussions on clinical practices. Three clinical examples were chosen to illustrate the application of the recommended methodology in treatment planning.

Results

Following the literature review, a guideline on evaluation and reporting using the dose averaged LET (LETd) of primary and secondary protons calculated in water normalized to unit density was established. The McNamara variable RBE model with an α/β value of 2 Gy was selected for reporting.

Conclusion

The study presents a harmonization of approaches to evaluating and reporting LET and variable RBE in a guideline for the three Dutch proton therapy centers, providing clarity for future clinical interpretation. Having chosen a single variable RBE model offers practicality, although its accuracy remains a topic of ongoing research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和报告胶质瘤质子治疗中的 LET 和 RBE 加权剂量 - 荷兰的方法
背景和目的与光子相比,质子治疗的线性能量传递(LET)更高,导致 DNA 损伤增加,因此质子治疗的相对生物有效性(RBE)也随之增加。然而,质子的线性能量传递(LET)和相对生物有效性(RBE)在质子范围内各不相同,尤其是在布拉格峰,这给脑肿瘤的质子治疗规划带来了挑战。本文旨在统一荷兰质子治疗中心对 2 级和 3 级 IDH 突变胶质瘤患者进行质子治疗时的 LET 和 RBE 的评估和报告。联合文献综述为 LET 和 RBE 的标准化评估和报告提供了支持。2020 年和 2023 年向三家荷兰质子中心发出的调查问卷为临床实践的讨论提供了信息。结果根据文献综述,制定了使用剂量平均 LET(LETd)进行评估和报告的指南,LETd 是在水中计算的一级质子和二级质子的剂量平均值,归一化为单位密度。该研究在荷兰三家质子治疗中心的指南中统一了 LET 和可变 RBE 的评估和报告方法,为今后的临床解释提供了清晰的思路。选择单一的可变 RBE 模型具有实用性,但其准确性仍是一个持续研究的课题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
Dosimetric impact of sparing base of heart on organ at risk doses during lung radiotherapy Evaluating and reporting LET and RBE-weighted dose in proton therapy for glioma – The Dutch approach A critical reflection of radiotherapy on osseous free flaps in mandibular segmental resection and immediate reconstruction in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cohort study Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies Deep learning-based multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive treatment planning approach to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1