Does the association between physical activity during work and leisure and blood pressure differ across sex? A cross-sectional compositional data analysis in a Danish population-based cohort.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20302-5
Melker S Johansson, Ole Steen Mortensen, Charlotte Ørsted Hougaard, Michael Hecht Olsen, Mette Korshøj
{"title":"Does the association between physical activity during work and leisure and blood pressure differ across sex? A cross-sectional compositional data analysis in a Danish population-based cohort.","authors":"Melker S Johansson, Ole Steen Mortensen, Charlotte Ørsted Hougaard, Michael Hecht Olsen, Mette Korshøj","doi":"10.1186/s12889-024-20302-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A proposed risk factor for cardiovascular disease is high occupational physical activity (OPA), which seems to increase blood pressure (BP), in contrast to leisure time physical activity. Increased BP may lead to hypertension that increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and premature death. Exposures to OPA differ across sex and also within occupational group. Thus, we aimed to investigate associations between OPA and LTPA and BP among men and women using compositional data analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based cross-sectional study, used data from the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank. OPA and LTPA were self-reported time spent in light physical activity (LPA) during work = standing or walking work; moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during work = heavy manual work; LPA during leisure = light physical activity during leisure; MVPA during leisure = biking or walking as commute to work + daily amount of MVPA during leisure, and sleep. Systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP; mmHg) was measured during sitting rest. We used linear regression models to investigate the association between OPA and LTPA, expressed as isometric log-ratios, and BP. The models were used to predict the BP for reallocated physical activity (PA) compositions (i.e., theoretically 'moving' time from sitting to PA within each domain). Specifically, we predicted the BP for each reallocated PA compositions and calculated the difference in BP between the reallocated compositions and the mean composition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1,334 women and 2,983 men (mean age 55.1 and 52.5 years, respectively) were included in the analyses. About 50% of the women, and 66% of the men, had hypertension. The linear regressions based on the compositional data analysis, showed no association between OPA and LTPA and SBP among women or men. Among men, less time spent sitting and more time spent in LTPA, compared to the mean composition, was associated with a lower DBP (e.g., 60 min less sitting and 60 min more LTPA: -0.25, 95% CI: -0.05, -0.45 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No association between OPA and LTPA and BP was observed across sexes, except between LTPA and DBP among men. This could be due to information bias and lack of precision in self-reported time use data of PA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"3290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20302-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A proposed risk factor for cardiovascular disease is high occupational physical activity (OPA), which seems to increase blood pressure (BP), in contrast to leisure time physical activity. Increased BP may lead to hypertension that increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and premature death. Exposures to OPA differ across sex and also within occupational group. Thus, we aimed to investigate associations between OPA and LTPA and BP among men and women using compositional data analysis.

Methods: This population-based cross-sectional study, used data from the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank. OPA and LTPA were self-reported time spent in light physical activity (LPA) during work = standing or walking work; moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during work = heavy manual work; LPA during leisure = light physical activity during leisure; MVPA during leisure = biking or walking as commute to work + daily amount of MVPA during leisure, and sleep. Systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP; mmHg) was measured during sitting rest. We used linear regression models to investigate the association between OPA and LTPA, expressed as isometric log-ratios, and BP. The models were used to predict the BP for reallocated physical activity (PA) compositions (i.e., theoretically 'moving' time from sitting to PA within each domain). Specifically, we predicted the BP for each reallocated PA compositions and calculated the difference in BP between the reallocated compositions and the mean composition.

Results: In total, 1,334 women and 2,983 men (mean age 55.1 and 52.5 years, respectively) were included in the analyses. About 50% of the women, and 66% of the men, had hypertension. The linear regressions based on the compositional data analysis, showed no association between OPA and LTPA and SBP among women or men. Among men, less time spent sitting and more time spent in LTPA, compared to the mean composition, was associated with a lower DBP (e.g., 60 min less sitting and 60 min more LTPA: -0.25, 95% CI: -0.05, -0.45 mmHg).

Conclusion: No association between OPA and LTPA and BP was observed across sexes, except between LTPA and DBP among men. This could be due to information bias and lack of precision in self-reported time use data of PA.

Trial registration: None.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作和休闲期间的体育锻炼与血压之间的关系是否因性别而异?丹麦人群队列的横截面构成数据分析。
背景:职业体力活动(OPA)是心血管疾病的一个拟议风险因素,与业余体力活动相比,职业体力活动似乎会增加血压(BP)。血压升高可能导致高血压,从而增加罹患心血管疾病和过早死亡的风险。不同性别和不同职业群体所接触的 OPA 都有所不同。因此,我们旨在通过成分数据分析,研究 OPA 和 LTPA 与男性和女性血压之间的关系:这项基于人群的横断面研究使用了哥本哈根中老年生物库的数据。OPA和LTPA是自我报告的工作期间轻体力活动(LPA)时间=站立或步行工作;工作期间中到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)时间=重体力工作;休闲期间LPA=休闲期间轻体力活动;休闲期间MVPA=骑自行车或步行上下班+休闲期间每日MVPA量和睡眠。坐着休息时测量收缩压和舒张压(SBP、DBP;mmHg)。我们使用线性回归模型来研究 OPA 和 LTPA(以等长对数比表示)与血压之间的关系。这些模型用于预测重新分配的体力活动(PA)构成(即理论上将每个领域内的坐姿时间 "移动 "到体力活动时间)的血压。具体来说,我们预测了每种重新分配的体力活动构成的血压,并计算了重新分配的构成与平均构成之间的血压差异:共有 1,334 名女性和 2,983 名男性(平均年龄分别为 55.1 岁和 52.5 岁)参与了分析。约 50% 的女性和 66% 的男性患有高血压。基于组成数据分析的线性回归结果显示,在女性和男性中,OPA 和 LTPA 与 SBP 之间没有关联。在男性中,与平均组成相比,坐的时间越少,LTPA时间越长,DBP越低(例如,坐的时间少60分钟,LTPA时间多60分钟:-0.25,95% CI:-0.05,-0.45 mmHg):结论:在不同性别中,OPA 和 LTPA 与血压之间没有关联,但男性的 LTPA 与 DBP 之间有关联。这可能是由于信息偏差和自我报告的PA时间使用数据缺乏精确性造成的:试验注册:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between physical activity level and timing and sleep quality and hygiene in healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study. Beliefs underlying weight control behaviors among adolescents and emerging adults living with obesity: an elicitation qualitative study. Advanced liver fibrosis, but not MASLD, is associated with accelerated biological aging: a population-based study. Association between metabolic phenotypes and incident pre-sarcopenia: 3 years follow-up of Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Association between sleep and gallstone disease in United States adults: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1